Enhancing wheat productivity and economics through microbe-mediated phosphorus fertilization in wheat–mustard intercropping systems of the semi-arid region of India
299
Keywords:
Growth parameters, Phosphorus nutrition, Productivity, ProfitabilityAbstract
Phosphorus (P) deficiency and inefficient P use resulted low P use efficiency (15-20%) remain critical constraints in wheat-based cropping systems, particularly under resource-limited and intercropped environments. Moreover, the rising cost of P fertilizers and the environmental concerns associated with their excessive use have intensified the need for eco-friendly P management strategies. Therefore, a field trial was conducted during 2021-22 to 2022-23 at ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi. Four cropping systems (CSs) viz. CS1: Sole wheat (control); CS2: Sole mustard; CS3: Wheat + mustard (5:1); CS4: Wheat + mustard (5:2) and six P management strategies (PMS) viz. PMS1: Control; PMS2: RDF; PMS3: 75% RDP+ PSB; PMS4: 75%RDP+PROM; PMS5: 75% RDP + PROM + PSB; PMS6: No RDP+ PROM+PSB in split plot design with three replications. Among the PMS; 75% RDP + PROM + PSB significantly outperformed others. It recorded the highest wheat equivalent yield (56.86 t/ha), which was 34.5% higher than the control (PMS1). This was accompanied by the highest test weight (41.8 g), tiller density (509.7/m²), harvest index (43.1%), and net return (₹129.3 ×10³/ha), with a benefit-cost ratio of 3.28 (vs. 2.76 in PMS1). Additionally, P5 improved dry matter accumulation at harvest (1001 g/plant, a 23.1% increase over PMS1), leaf area index (5.73), and crop growth rate (4.57 g/m²/day at 40 DAS, up by 37.3% over PMS1). In terms of cropping systems, C4 (wheat + mustard in 5:2 row ratio) proved superior with the highest wheat equivalent yield (56.16 t/ha), representing a 9.6% increase over sole wheat (C1). This system also enhanced dry matter accumulation (1000 g/plant), crop growth rate at 80 DAS (18.9 g/m²/day), and economic returns (₹82.2 ×10³/ha net return), while maintaining a high benefit-cost ratio (2.44). These results underscore the potential of 75% RDP + PROM + PSB and strategic intercropping (wheat + mustard in 5:2 row ratio) with mustard for improving productivity and profitability and support the adoption of biologically enriched P sources to reduce dependency on chemical fertilizers.
Downloads
References
Banik P, Dey A and Maity A. 2022. Role of biofertilizers in phosphorus solubilization and its effect on crop productivity – A review. Agricultural Reviews 43(1): 10–20.
Bünemann E K, Steinebrunner F, Smithson P C, Frossard E and Oberson A. 2011. Phosphorus dynamics in a highly weathered soil as revealed by isotopic labeling techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75: 1406–1418.
FAO. 2023. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/faostat
Ghaley B B, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Høgh-Jensen H and Jensen E S. 2018. Intercropping of wheat and pea for improved resource use efficiency and crop productivity. Field Crops Research 231: 23–30.
Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John wiley & sons.
ICAR-IIWBR. 2023. Vision 2050. Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal. https://iiwbr.icar.gov.in
Jain N K and Dahama A K. 2007. Effect of phosphorus and zinc on yield, nutrient uptake and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77(5).
Jat H S, Sharma P C and Kumar V. 2023. Diversified cropping systems for sustainable intensification in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Field Crops Research 295: 108901.
Kumar A, Singh R and Singh N. 2021. Biofertilizers as sustainable tools for improving soil fertility and crop productivity. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23: 12000–12019.
Kumar A, Yadav S K and Meena R S. 2023. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria for sustainable agriculture: Mechanisms and field potential. Rhizosphere 26: 100651.
Li C, Hoffland E, Kuyper T W, Yu Y, Zhang C, Li H, Zhang F and van der Werf W. 2020. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nature Plants 6: 653–660.
Li L, Li S M, Sun J H, Zhou L L, Bao X G, Zhang H G and Zhang F S. 2018. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(18): 5191–5196.
Li L, Tilman D, Lambers H and Zhang F S. 2014. Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist 203: 63–69.
Meena V S, Maurya B R, Verma J P and Meena R S. 2022. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture: a review. Environmental Sustainability 5: 1–15.
Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers' Welfare. 2023. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Government of India. https://agricoop.nic.in
Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood S S, et al. 2021. Impact of climate change on crops adaptation and strategies to tackle its outcome: A review. Plants 10: 248.
Richardson A E, Barea J M, McNeill A M and Prigent-Combaret C. 2009. Acquisition of phosphorus and nitrogen in the rhizosphere and plant growth promotion by microorganisms. Plant and Soil 321: 305–339.
Sahu A, Pandey V C and Singh N. 2021. Role of microbial phosphorus biofertilizers in soil fertility and crop productivity under acidic soils. Land Degradation & Development 32(7): 2263–2273.
Sharma S B, Sayyed R Z, Trivedi M H and Gobi T A. 2013. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2: 587.
Sharma S K, Kumar A and Srivastava P C. 2020. Phosphorus management in Indian agriculture: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 19(3): 267–275.
Sharma S N, Prasad R, Dwivedi M K and Kumar S. 2009. Effect of residue and rates and sources of phosphorus application on growth, yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 79(10).
Singh R, Choudhary A K and Meena R S. 2022. Advances in intercropping systems for sustainable intensification. Agronomy 12(3): 689.
Singh U and Ahlawat I P S. 2006. Productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility as influenced by phosphorus management in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 76(9).
Srivastava R K, Patel D A, Saravaiya S N and Chaudhari P P. 2008. Intercropping of wheat and mustard – A review. Agricultural Reviews 29(3): 167–176.
Willey R W. 1979. Intercropping—its importance and research needs. Part 1: Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 1–10.
Zhang H, Wang X, Wang Z, Cui L and Xia Y. 2021. Intercropping improves leaf area index and radiation use efficiency in maize-wheat relay strip systems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 310: 108624.
Zhou J, Liu Y, Wang J, Yu H and Luo Y. 2023. Biofertilizers improve phosphorus availability and uptake in wheat under field conditions. Field Crops Research 293: 108880.
Zhou Y, Chen Y, Liu H, Zhang C and Wang J. 2023. Optimizing crop growth rate and yield through intercropping: insights from grain and biomass partitioning. Field Crops Research 295: 108899.
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.