Response of almond (Prunus dulcis) to different drip irrigation levels vis-à-vis various phenological stages on flowering and yield of almond cv. Shalimar

Ishtiyaq A Khan; M Swani; M A Mir; N Ahmad; K Mushtaq; G I Hassan

doi:10.56093/ijas.v82i7.21686

Authors

Ishtiyaq A Khan Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121
M Swani Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121
M A Mir Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121
N Ahmad Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121
K Mushtaq Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121
G I Hassan Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir 191 121

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v82i7.21686

Keywords:

Evapotranspiration, Micro irrigation, Prunus dulcis, Regulated deficit irrigation, Yield

Abstract

Experiment was conducted to assess the effect of different irrigation levels vis-à-vis various stages of flowering, fruit set and yield of almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) plantation cv. Shalimar. The results revealed that irrigation applied at various stages of growth and development improved flowering, fruit set and yield of almond significantly. Maximum bloom intensity, fruit set and yield were recorded with highest evaporation replenishment of 100 ETc applied throughout the season during first and second year respectively. The study further confirmed that highest flowering and yield attributes of almond recorded at 100% ETc level of irrigation were found to be statistically at par with measured parameters recorded at 75% ETc level of irrigation when applied at fruit growth stage and throughout the growth stage. The results revealed clearly that flowering and early fruit growth stages are the most critical stages of irrigation in almond and that post-harvest irrigation may prove to be beneficial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad M F, Samanta A. and Jabeen A. 2010. Response of sweet cherry (Prunus avium) to fertigation of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium under karewa land of Kashmir valley. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 80 (6): 512–6.

Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D and Smith M. 1999. Crop evapotranspiration–Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper 56, United Nations– Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

Esparza G, Dejong T M, Weinbaum S A and Klein I. 2001. Effects of irrigation deprivation during the harvest period on the yield determinants in mature almond trees. Tree Physiology 21: 1073– 79.

Fereres E and Goldhamer D A. 1990. Deciduous fruit and nut trees. (in) Irrigation of Agricultural Crops, pp 987–1017. Stewart B A and Nielsen D R (Eds). (Monograph 30) American Society of Agronomy. Madison, Wis.

Girona J, Mata M and Marsal J. 2005. Regulated deficit irrigation during the kernel filling period and optimal irrigation rates in almond. Agricultural Water Management 75: 152–67.

Goldhamer D A and Viveros M. 2000. Effects of pre-harvest irrigation cut off durations and post harvest water deprivation on almond tree performance. Irrigation Science 19: 125–31.

Goldhamer D A, Viveros M, and Salinias M. 2006. Regulated deficit irrigation in almonds:effects of variations in applied water and stress timing on yield and yield components. Irrigation Science 24(2) : 101–14.

Lampinen B, Dejong T, Steve W, Claudia N, Viveros M, McIlvane J, Ravid N and Baker R. 2007. Spur dynamics and almond productivity. Proceedings of 35th Annual Almond Industry Conference, pp 73–7. December 5–6, 2007. Modesto CA.

Naor A. 2001. The effect of irrigation and crop level on fruit size and water relations in field grown ‘Spadona’ (Pyrus communis) pear. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Sciences 126: 252–5.

Romero P, Botia P and Garcia F. 2004. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation under subsurface drip irrigation conditions. Plant and Soil 260: 169–81.

Synder R L and Pruitt W O. 1989. Crop coefficients. (in) Irrigation Scheduling : A Guide for Efficient On-farm Water Management, 30–2 pp. Goldhamer D A and Snyder R L (Eds). Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, USA, Publication No. 21454.

Westwood M N. 1993. Temperate Zone Pomology. Freeman W H and Company San Francisco, 523 pp.