Evaluation of Chrysanthemum morifolium varieties for salinity tolerance under hydroponic system
317 / 147
Keywords:
Hoagland Solution, Membrane Stability Index, Proline, SalinityAbstract
Salinity tolerance of 22 varieties of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.) was studied in National Phytotron Facility, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi at five different salinity levels (0, 50, 100, 150, 200 mmol/L). Salt tolerance was identified by measuring changes of different physiological as well as morphological parameters such as chlorophyll, proline, MSI (Membrane Stability Index), shoot length, root length, dry weight, etc. In the present study, it was found that the amount of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll decreased with increase in the amount of salt concentration. At 100 mmol/L NaCl, the highest total chlorophyll content was found in Pusa Aditya, Haldighati, Lalit, Little Pink and Jaya, whereas lowest was observed in Pusa Sona, Yellow Gold and Himanshu. The rate of reduction in dry weight is dependent on the level of stress and variety. The greatest reduction in dry weight was found under 200 mmol/L NaCl treatment. The MSI reduced up to 47.64% under 200 mmol/L NaCl treatment from 85.65% of control. Reduction in MSI with increase in salinity may be due to high electrolyte leakage from cells of susceptible varieties. An increase in Proline content was observed under salt treated plants as compared to the plants under control. There was significant decrease in the root length with increase in the salt concentration. On the basis of modified standard evaluation score (SES) of visual salt injury, the 22 varieties can be grouped into tolerant, moderately tolerant, susceptible and highly susceptible with most of the varieties falling under the category of moderately tolerant. Little Pink, Lalit, Haldighati and Pusa Aditya falling under the tolerant category while Himanshu and Pusa Sona are grouped under susceptible and highly susceptible category respectively.Downloads
References
Bailly C, Benamar A, Corbineau F and Cone D. 1996. Changes in malondialdehyde content and in superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione reductase activities in sunflower seeds as related to deterioration during accelerated aging. Physiologia Plantarum 97: 104–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.1996.970116.x
Bray E A, Bailey, Serres J and Weretilnyk, E. 2000. Responses to abiotic stresses. (in) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants, pp 1 158–1 249. Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R (Eds). American Society of Plant Physiologists.
Boyer J S. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
Chandan, S., Amanjot, S., Krishan, K., Eduardo, B. and Anil, G. 2006. Salt stress response in rice: genetics, molecular biology, and comparative genomics. Funct Integr Genomics 6: 263–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-006-0032-5
Chung B N, Choi G S, Kim H R and Kim J S. 2001. Chrysanthemum stunt viroid in Dendranthema grandiflorum. Plant Pathology 17: 194–200.
Dionisio-Sese and Tobita S.1998. Antioxidant response of rice seedlings to salinity stress. Plant Science 135: 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
Guan Z, Chen, S., Chena, F, Liu Z, Fang W and Tang J. 2012. Comparison of stress effect of NaCl, Na+ and Cl- on two Chrysanthemum species. Acta Horticulturae 937: 369–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.937.45
Ghoulam C, Foursy A and Fares K. 2002. Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars. Environmental and Experimental Botany 47: 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(01)00109-5
Hossain Z, Kalam A, Mandal A, Shukla R and Datta, S K. 2004. NaCl stress-its chromotoxic effects and antioxidant behaviour in roots of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. Plant Science 166: 215–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.09.009
Levitt J. 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses: Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stresses, p 520. Academic Press, New York.
Lee M, Iersel, Marc W. 2008. Sodium chloride effects on growth, morphology, and physiology of Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). HortScience 43(6): 1 888–91.
Lee M K and van Iersel M S. 200 8. Sodium chloride effects on the Growth, morphology, and physiology of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). HortScience 43:1 888–1891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1888
Li H J and Shao J W. 1990. Investigation, collection and classification of chrysanthemum cultivars in China. Nanjing Agricultural University 13: 30–6.
Liu S, Chen S, Chen Y, Guan Z, Yin D and Chen F. 2011. In vitro induced tetraploid of Dendranthema nankingense (Nakai) Tzvel. shows an improved level of abiotic stress tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae 127: 411–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.10.012
Montesano F and van Iersel M W. 2007. Calcium can prevent toxic effects of Na+ on tomato leaf photosynthesis but does not restore growth. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 132: 310–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.132.3.310
Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25: 239–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
Nagata T and deA ´ vila A C. 2000. Transmission of chrysanthemum stem necrosis virus, a recently discovered tospovirus, by two thrips species. Journal of Phytopathology 148: 123–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0434.2000.00475.x
Okusanya O T, Ungar I A. 1984. The growth and mineral composition of three species of Spergularia as affected by salinity and nutrients at high salinity. American Journal of Botany 71: 439–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb12529.x
Zhu W, Jiang J, Chen S,Wang L, Xu L, Wang H, Li, P, Guan Z and Chen F. 2013. Intergeneric hybrid between Chrysanthemum × morifolium and Artemisia japonica achieved via embryo rescue shows salt tolerance. Euphytica 191: 109–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-013-0869-3
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.