Selection for egg production in native chicken of Kerala for two successive generations


59 / 44

Authors

  • S HARIKRISHNAN University Poultry and Duck Farm, Mannuthy
  • B CHACKO College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy
  • P ANITHA College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy
  • B C JOSPEH AICRP on Poultry for Eggs, Mannuthy

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i8.159196

Keywords:

ASM, Hen housed egg production, Native chicken, Selection

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the production characteristics of native chicken of Kerala and to improve its egg production through selection. From the base generation (G0) of native chicken, 775 female and 200 male native chicken (G1) were produced through a pedigreed hatch and the pullets were evaluated till 40 weeks of age for their production performance. Based on egg number 40, selection was carried out in the population using Osborne’s index and 300 dams and 50 sires were selected for producing G2 generation through a pedigreed hatch. The pullets were evaluated for their production performance till 40 weeks of age. The egg production traits were evaluated and compared in two successive generations. The native chicken of Kerala had a hen housed production of 69.83 eggs, hen day egg production of 70.72 and survivor’s egg production of 70.97 at 40 weeks of age. Based on the selection for egg number 40 in G1 generation of native chicken, the hen day egg production (4.56 eggs) and survivor’s egg production (5.90 eggs) was significantly (p<0.05) improved but the improvement in hen housed egg production was not evident due to higher mortality in G2 generation as a result of incidence of infectious neoplastic disease in the flock. However, a positive phenotypic response of 2.26 eggs was obtained on hen housed basis as a result of selection for egg number 40 in G1 generation. The age at sexual maturity of native chicken was significantly (p<0.05) improved in G2 generation. A significantly (p<0.001) lower egg weight was observed for the birds in G2 generation at 40 weeks of age without any significant difference at 28 weeks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahlawat S P S and Chatterjee R N. 2002. Conservation of indigenous poultry germplasm of A & N islands. In: Chatterjee RN (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Workshop on Characterization and Conservation of Indigenous Poultry Germplasm, 26–27 February 2002. National Agricultural Technology Project, Division of Animal Science and Andaman Science Association, Central Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair.

AICRP [All India Co-ordinated Research Project]. 2018. Annual report of poultry breeding and seed project, 2017–18. ICAR, Directorate of Poultry Research. 106 p.

Behera D, Pradhan C R, Behura N C, Mohapatra L M, Mohanty G P, Behera K, Das D P and Sahu R K. 2017. Production performance of Hansli chicken in Odisha. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5: 1219–24.

Chatterjee R N, Yadav S P, Senani S, Kundu A, Saha S K, Jeyakumar S, Sunder J, Bharathi D, Rai R B, Tantia M S and Ahlawat S P S. 2002. Conservation of indigenous poultry germplasm of A & N Islands [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the National Workshop on Characterization and Conservation of Indigenous Poultry Germplasm, 26–27 February 2002.

National Agricultural Technology Project, Division of Animal Science and Andaman Science Association, Central Agricultural Research Institute, Port Blair. pp. 80–81.

Firozjah N G, Atashi H and Zare A. 2015. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Mazandaran native chickens. Journal of Animal and Poultry Sciences 4: 20–26.

Girishkumar P. 2009. Evaluation of native chicken of northern Kerala. M.V.Sc. thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, Kerala. 149 p.

Gopinath C R. 2013. Characterization and performance evaluation of indigenous chicken in the Mysore division of Karnataka state. Ph.D. thesis, Karnataka Veterinary Animal Fisheries Sciences University, Bidar, Karnataka. 266 p.

Haunshi S, Doley S and Shakuntala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of north eastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–5.

Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Shanmugam M, Padhi M K, Reddy M R, Sunitha R, Rajkumar U and Panda AK. 2011. Characterization of two Indian native breeds for production, egg and semen quality, and welfare traits. Poultry Science 90: 314–20.

Haunshi S, Padhi M K, Niranjan M, Rajkumar U, Shanmugam M and Chatterjee R N. 2013. Comparative evaluation of native breeds of chicken for persistency of egg production, egg quality and biochemical traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 59–62.

Haunshi S, Shanmugam M, Rajkumar U, Padhi M K and Niranjan M. 2015. Characterization of Ghagus breed vis-a-vis PD–4 birds for production, adaptability, semen and egg quality traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 1338–42.

Leotaragul A, Sawasdee P and Kammongkun J. 2015. Productive performance and genetic parameters of laying characters of Thai native chicken (Pradu – Hangdum Chiangmai). Khon Kaen Agricultural Journal 43: 238–41.

Osborne R. 1957a. The use of sire and dam family averages in increasing the efficiency of selective breeding under a hierarchal mating system. Heredity 11: 93–116.

Osborne R. 1957b. Family selection in poultry. The use of sire and dam family averages in choosing male parents. Proceedings of Royal Society, Edinburgh 66: 374–93.

Pradeep M A and Sharma S R K. 2017. Backyard Chicken Farming: For Income, Health and Happiness. In: Training Manual on THEERANAIPUNYA- Skill Enhancement and Capacity Development of Fisher Youth. ICAR-CMFRI and SAF Initiative 331–38.

Singh M K, Kumar S, Sharma R K, Singh S K, Singh B and Singh D V. 2018. Heritability estimates of adult body weight and egg production traits in indigenous Uttara chicken. International Journal of Genetics 10: 357–59.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th Edition, Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 313.

Thankachan S. 2011. Egg quality of native chicken under backyard system and White Leghorn layers under intensive system of rearing. M.V.Sc. thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala. 104 p.

Valavan S E, Omprakash A V and Bharathidasan A. 2016a. Production performance of Kadaknath in an organized poultry farm. International Journal of Applied and Pure Science and Agriculture 2: 125–28.

Valavan S E, Omprakash A V, Bharathidasan A and Kumar V R S. 2016b. Production performance of Aseel under Indian tropical condition. International Journal of Applied and Pure Science and Agriculture 2: 107–10.

Vij P K, Tantia M S, Mishra B, Kumar S T B and Vijh R K. 2006. Characterization of Aseel, Danki, Kalasthi and Ghagus breeds of chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 76: 944–49.

Vij P K, Tantia M S, Anilkumar K and Vijh R K. 2008. Phenotypic and genetic characteristics of Tellicherry breed of chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 78: 1420–22.

Vij P K, Tantia M S and Pan S. 2015. Performance of Harringhata Black chicken under field conditions. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 930–32.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-10-29

Published

2026-01-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HARIKRISHNAN, S. ., CHACKO, B. ., ANITHA, P. ., & JOSPEH, B. C. . (2026). Selection for egg production in native chicken of Kerala for two successive generations. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 95(8), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v95i8.159196
Citation