Molecular characterization of Shigatoxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) in sheep and goat in Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh
78 / 49 / 32
Keywords:
Antibiogram profile, E. coli, ESBL, STEC, Genotyping, Virulence genesAbstract
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains represent an emerging threat in foodborne bacterial pathogens. The present study was designed to determine prevalence of STEC, antibiogram profile, ESBLs and genetic diversity. Among the 468 samples analyzed, 172 (36.75%) were confirmed to be E. coli by species specific PCR. Out of the 172 confirmed E. coli isolates, 42 (24.41% ) isolates carried either stx1, stx2 or both indicating them to be STEC. Along with shiga toxins, virulence genes eaeA and hlyA genes were also present in some of the isolates. The antibiogram profile of STEC isolates revealed highest resistance against ampicillin (90.47%) followed by tetracycline (80.95%), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (76.19%), co-trimoxazole (71.42%), ceftriaxone (69.04%), ciprofloxacin (54.76%), chloramphenicol (21.42%) and amikacin (14.28%). Extended spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL) genes were detected in 10 isolates, with blaTEM in seven isolates and blaCTX-M-9 in three isolates. Both ERIC and REP-PCR genotyping methods differentiated STEC into different strains and are considered to be highly suitable genotyping methods and can be effectively utilized for epidemiological investigation of isolates.
Downloads
References
Asakura, H, Masuda K, Yamamoto S and Igimi S. 2014. Molecular Approach for Tracing Dissemination Routes of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli O157 in Bovine Offal at Slaughter. BioMed Research International 2014(1): 739139.
Bauer A W, Kirby W M M, Serris J C and Turck M. 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 45: 493–96
Beutin L, Geier D, Steinrück H, Zimmermann S and Scheutz F. 1993. Prevalence and some properties of verotoxin (Shiga-like toxin)-producing Escherichia coli in seven different species of healthy domestic animals. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 31(9): 2483–88.
Brooks J T, Sowers E G, Wells J G, Greene K D, Griffin P M, Hoekstra R M and Strockbine N A. 2005. Non-O157 Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 192(8): 1422–29.
Campos M R H, André M C D P B, Borges L J, Kipnis A, Pimenta F C and Serafini A B. 2009. Genetic heterogeneity of Escherichia coli strains isolated from raw milk, Minas Frescal cheese, and food handlers. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 61: 1203–09.
CLSI 2021. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance standards for Antimicrobial Suscpetibility Testing: CLSI Supplement M100 31st ed. Wayne, PA, USA.
Dallenne C, Da Costa A, Decre D, Favier C and Arlet G. 2010. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother 65(3): 490–95.
Desmarchelier P M, Bilge S S, Fegan, N, Mills L, Vary Jr J C and Tarr P I. 1998. A PCR specific for Escherichia coli O157 based on the rfb locus encoding O157 lipopolysaccharide. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36(6): 1801–04
Elsayed M S A E, Awad A, Tarabees R and Marzouk A. 2018. Virulence repertoire and antimicrobial resistance profile of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli isolated from sheep and goat farms from Al-buhayra Egypt. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 38(4): 429–33.
European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (EFSA and ECDC). 2019.
The European Union one health 2018 zoonoses report. EFSA journal 17(12): e05926.
Fernández D, Rodriguez E M, Arroyo G H, Padola, N L and Parma A E. 2009. Seasonal variation of Shiga toxin-encoding genes (stx) and detection of E. coli O157 in dairy cattle from Argentina. Journal of Applied Microbiology 106(4): 1260–67.
Kawano K, Okada M, Haga T, Maeda K and Goto Y. 2008. Relationship between pathogenicity for humans and stx genotype in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O157. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 27: 227–32.
Majowicz S E, Scallan E, Jones-Bitton A, Sargeant J M, Stapleton I, Angulo F J and Kirk M D. 2014. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infection deaths: a systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodborne pathogens and disease 11(6): 447–55.
Melton-Celsa A R. 1998. Structure, biology, and relative toxicity of Shiga toxin family members for cells and animals. Escherichia coli O157: H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli strains 121–28.
Mohapatra B R and Mazumder A. 2008. Comparative efficacy of five different rep-PCR methods to discriminate Escherichia coli populations in aquatic environments. Water Science and Technology 58(3): 537–47.
Naidu S T, Bodempudi B, Chinnam B K, Pedada V C, Nelapati S, Tumati S R, Gottapu C, Talluri H L, Puvvada S, Chekuri N, Kumar G N and Susmitha B. 2021. Prevalence of β-lactamase Producing Shiga Toxigenic E. coli (STEC) in Retail Meats and Chicken Cloacal Swabs. Journal of Animal Research 11(2): 263–71.
Ndegwa E, Alahmde A, Kim C, Kaseloo P and O’Brien D. 2020. Age related differences in phylogenetic diversity, prevalence of Shiga toxins, Intimin, Hemolysin genes and select serogroups of Escherichia. coli from pastured meat goats detected in a longitudinal cohort study. BioMed central Veterinary Research 16: 1–15.
Ojo O E, Ajuwape A T P, Otesile E B, Owoade AA, Oyekunle M A and Adetosoye A I .2010. Potentially zoonotic shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serogroups in the faeces and meat of food-producing animals in Ibadan, Nigeria. International Journal of Food Microbiology 142(1-2): 214–21.
Paton A W and Paton J C. 1998. Detection and characterization of Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli by using multiplex PCR assays for stx 1, stx 2, eaeA, enterohemorrhagic E. coli hlyA, rfb O111, and rfb O157. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 36(2): 598–602.
Peacock E, Jacob V W and Fallone S M. 2001. Escherichia coli O157: H7: etiology, clinical features, complications, and treatment. Nephrology Nursing Journal 28(5): 547.
Ray R and Singh P. 2022. Prevalence and implications of shiga toxin-producing E. coli in farm and wild ruminants. Pathogens 11(11): 1332.
Scheutz F, Teel L D, Beutin L, Piérard D, Buvens G, Karch H and O’Brien A D. 2012. Multicenter evaluation of a sequence-based protocol for subtyping Shiga toxins and standardizing Stx nomenclature. Journal of clinical microbiology 50(9): 2951–63.
Sun D B, Rui W U, HE X J, Shuang W A N G, LIN Y C, Xu H A N, WANG Y Q, GUO T T, WU G J and YANG K L. 2011. Development of a multiplex PCR for diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Bacillus cereus from cows with endometritis. Agricultural Sciences in China 10(10): 1624–29.
Wani S A, Samanta I, Munshi Z H, Bhat M A and Nishikawa Y. 2006. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in healthy goats in India: occurrence and virulence properties. Journal of Applied Microbiology 100(1): 108–13.
Zaheri H, Ghanbarpour R, Jajarmi M, Bagheri M, Ghanadian A and Askari Badouei M. 2020. Public health aspects of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains in sheep and goats of Bakhtiari pastoral tribe, Iran. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52: 2721–24.
Zhao X, Zhao H, Zhou Z, Miao Y, Li R, Yang B and Yang Z. 2022. Characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates that cause diarrhea in sheep in Northwest China. Microbiology Spectrum 10(4): e01595-22.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.