Random regression models for genetic analysis of body weight in crossbred pigs


380 / 716

Authors

  • G K GAUR Principal Scientist and In-charge, ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • N R SAHOO Senior Scientist and In-charge, ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • P K BHARTI Scientist, ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • MUKESH SINGH Principal Scientist, ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India
  • TRIVENI DUTT Joint Director (Academic), ICAR–Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh 243 122 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95012

Keywords:

Body weight, Crossbred pigs, Heritability estimates, Random regression model

Abstract

Body weight of an animal is represented by a continuous function of time (longitudinal trait) and can be characterized by a trajectory with number of measurements. The present study was carried out to determine heritability estimates of body weight in crossbred pigs (75% Landrace + 25% Bareilly local) using random regression model with Legendre polynomials of quadratic power. Data of 9044 records of 1,292 crossbred piglets, progeny of 86 boars and 98 sows; born in 184 parities between 5 years from 2013–17 was used for the study. Records on weight at birth and at 1 week interval up to 6 week were used. Model included sex, year of birth, season of birth and parity as fixed effect, age of dam at farrowing as co-variable and direct additive genetic effect and maternal permanent environmental effect as random regression. There was a steady increase in body weight over the age from birth (0.96 kg) to 6th week (9.0 kg). Direct additive genetic (0.006 to 7.37 kg2), maternal permanent environment (0.053 to 70.07 kg2) and total phenotypic (0.18 to 77.56 kg2) variance increased continuously from birth to 6 week of age. In general, heritability estimates of body weight at different ages of pre-weaning stage were low ranging from 0.031 to 0.12. The estimate increased up to 1st week (0.119±0.025) with very low value at birth (0.031±0.015) and decreased thereafter to 0.095±0.022 at 6 week. Relative importance of each order of Legendre polynomials showed that quadratic Legendre polynomials with three regression coefficients were enough to capture almost all variability in the model to explain all additive genetic and maternal permanent environment variability. Hence, use of random regression model with quadratic Legendre polynomials was suggested for genetic analysis of pig data for growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albuquerque L G and Meyer K. 2001. Estimates of covariance functions for growth from birth to 630 d of age in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2776–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79112776x

Begli H E, Torshizi R V, Masoudi A A, Ehsani A and Jensen J. 2016. Longitudinal analysis of body weight, feed intake and residual feed intake in F2 chickens. Livestock Science 184: 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.018

Groeneveld E, Kovac M and Mielenz N. 2010. VCE User’s guide and reference manual, version 6.0. Institute of Farm Animal Genetics. Neustadt, Germany.

Huisman A E, Veerkamp R F and Arendonk J A M V. 2002. Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80: 575– 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.803575x

Kaushik P, Handique P J, Rahman H, Das A, Das A K and Bhuyan G. 2013. Pre–weaning growth performance of pure and crossbred pigs under organized farm condition in Assam. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 2(6): 10–12.

Kumar R, Mandal B, Kumari N and Patel N. 2018. Performance of different genetic groups of pigs maintained under AICRP on pig. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 822–26.

Lukovic Z, Malovrh S, Gorjanc G, Uremovic M and Kovac M. 2003. Genetic parameters for number of piglets born alive using a random regression model. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 68(2): 105–08.

Lukovic Z, Malovrh S, Gorjanc G and Kovac M. 2004. A random regression model in analysis of litter size in pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science 34(4): 241–48.

Martina P, Milena K and Spela M. 2015. Analysis of back fat thickness in on–farm tested gilts in Slovenia using reaction norms. Acta Argiculturae Slovenica 106(2): 93–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2015.106.2.4

Meyer K. 1998. Modelling repeated records: co–variance functions and random regression models to analyse animal breeding data. Proceedings of 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 25: 517–20.

Meyer K. 2000. Random regressions to model phenotypic variation in monthly weights of Australian beef cows. Livestock Production Science 65: 19–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00183-9

Mondal S K and Kumar A. 2015. Genetic evaluation of pre– weaning growth traits in landrace × desi piglets. Indian Journal of Animal Research 49(2): 101–02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00116.8

Ouko V O, Ilatsia E D, Oduho G W and Kios D K. 2017. Genetic parameters for large white pigs reared under intensive management systems in Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 82(1): 47–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2016.1219544

SAS® 9.3. 2011. Second Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Sevon–Aimonen M L, Sternberg K and Ojala M. 1997. Genetic parameters for growth traits in pigs estimated using third degree polynomial functions. Agricultural and Food Science 6: 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.72774

Downloads

Submitted

2019-11-01

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

GAUR, G. K., SAHOO, N. R., BHARTI, P. K., SINGH, M., & DUTT, T. (2019). Random regression models for genetic analysis of body weight in crossbred pigs. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(10), 1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95012
Citation