Random regression models for genetic analysis of body weight in crossbred pigs
380 / 716
Keywords:
Body weight, Crossbred pigs, Heritability estimates, Random regression modelAbstract
Body weight of an animal is represented by a continuous function of time (longitudinal trait) and can be characterized by a trajectory with number of measurements. The present study was carried out to determine heritability estimates of body weight in crossbred pigs (75% Landrace + 25% Bareilly local) using random regression model with Legendre polynomials of quadratic power. Data of 9044 records of 1,292 crossbred piglets, progeny of 86 boars and 98 sows; born in 184 parities between 5 years from 2013–17 was used for the study. Records on weight at birth and at 1 week interval up to 6 week were used. Model included sex, year of birth, season of birth and parity as fixed effect, age of dam at farrowing as co-variable and direct additive genetic effect and maternal permanent environmental effect as random regression. There was a steady increase in body weight over the age from birth (0.96 kg) to 6th week (9.0 kg). Direct additive genetic (0.006 to 7.37 kg2), maternal permanent environment (0.053 to 70.07 kg2) and total phenotypic (0.18 to 77.56 kg2) variance increased continuously from birth to 6 week of age. In general, heritability estimates of body weight at different ages of pre-weaning stage were low ranging from 0.031 to 0.12. The estimate increased up to 1st week (0.119±0.025) with very low value at birth (0.031±0.015) and decreased thereafter to 0.095±0.022 at 6 week. Relative importance of each order of Legendre polynomials showed that quadratic Legendre polynomials with three regression coefficients were enough to capture almost all variability in the model to explain all additive genetic and maternal permanent environment variability. Hence, use of random regression model with quadratic Legendre polynomials was suggested for genetic analysis of pig data for growth.Downloads
References
Albuquerque L G and Meyer K. 2001. Estimates of covariance functions for growth from birth to 630 d of age in Nellore cattle. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2776–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79112776x
Begli H E, Torshizi R V, Masoudi A A, Ehsani A and Jensen J. 2016. Longitudinal analysis of body weight, feed intake and residual feed intake in F2 chickens. Livestock Science 184: 28–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.11.018
Groeneveld E, Kovac M and Mielenz N. 2010. VCE User’s guide and reference manual, version 6.0. Institute of Farm Animal Genetics. Neustadt, Germany.
Huisman A E, Veerkamp R F and Arendonk J A M V. 2002. Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe the weight data of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80: 575– 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.803575x
Kaushik P, Handique P J, Rahman H, Das A, Das A K and Bhuyan G. 2013. Pre–weaning growth performance of pure and crossbred pigs under organized farm condition in Assam. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 2(6): 10–12.
Kumar R, Mandal B, Kumari N and Patel N. 2018. Performance of different genetic groups of pigs maintained under AICRP on pig. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7: 822–26.
Lukovic Z, Malovrh S, Gorjanc G, Uremovic M and Kovac M. 2003. Genetic parameters for number of piglets born alive using a random regression model. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus 68(2): 105–08.
Lukovic Z, Malovrh S, Gorjanc G and Kovac M. 2004. A random regression model in analysis of litter size in pigs. South African Journal of Animal Science 34(4): 241–48.
Martina P, Milena K and Spela M. 2015. Analysis of back fat thickness in on–farm tested gilts in Slovenia using reaction norms. Acta Argiculturae Slovenica 106(2): 93–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2015.106.2.4
Meyer K. 1998. Modelling repeated records: co–variance functions and random regression models to analyse animal breeding data. Proceedings of 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 25: 517–20.
Meyer K. 2000. Random regressions to model phenotypic variation in monthly weights of Australian beef cows. Livestock Production Science 65: 19–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00183-9
Mondal S K and Kumar A. 2015. Genetic evaluation of pre– weaning growth traits in landrace × desi piglets. Indian Journal of Animal Research 49(2): 101–02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-0555.2015.00116.8
Ouko V O, Ilatsia E D, Oduho G W and Kios D K. 2017. Genetic parameters for large white pigs reared under intensive management systems in Kenya. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 82(1): 47–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2016.1219544
SAS® 9.3. 2011. Second Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Sevon–Aimonen M L, Sternberg K and Ojala M. 1997. Genetic parameters for growth traits in pigs estimated using third degree polynomial functions. Agricultural and Food Science 6: 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.72774
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.