Development of a scale to measure the perception of stakeholders towards marine fisheries governance: A methodological approach from a case study in Andhra Pradesh


172 / 101

Authors

  • P. Sandeep ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai-400 061, India.
  • J. Charles Jeeva ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute-Madras Regional Stationof Agricultural Research)Ocean View Layout, PandurangapuramAndhra University P.O., Visakhapatnam-530003.
  • P. S. Ananthan ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai-400 061, India.
  • V. Geethalakshmi ICAR - Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Kochi-682 029, India.
  • S. S. Raju Visakhapatnam Regional Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam-530 017, India.
  • S. D. Argade ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai-400 061, India.

https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2025.72.4.169233-14

Keywords:

Attitude, perception, governance, marine fisheries, APMFRA, stakeholders, perception scale

Abstract

This study aims at development of a psychological scale to measure the perception of stakeholders towards the Andhra Pradesh Marine Fisheries Regulation Act (APMFRA). The collection of items included 31 statements covering the dimensions such as zonation, registration, licensing, monitoring, implementation, conservation related fishing regulations, penalty structures and effectiveness. The 31 statements were evaluated by a group of 34 judges representing research, education and extension in the field of fisheries and social sciences, through which 18 statements were selected with relevancy percentage of more than 61 %, and mean relevancy score of more than 1.85. Through t-test item analysis, the final perception scale was constructed with 10 statements with t value of more than 1.75, out of the 18 statements. The scale has demonstrated both reliability and validity, confirming its consistency and accuracy in measuring perceptions of APMFRA. The administration of the scale among the stakeholders would elicit their perception towards the Act, and the areas to be strengthened for effective fisheries governance such as the regulations which are to be strengthened with the incorporation of scientific advisories, technological measures and conflict resolution mechanisms.

 Keywords: APMFRA, Attitude, Fishing regulations, Governance,  Psychological scale

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • J. Charles Jeeva, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute-Madras Regional Stationof Agricultural Research)Ocean View Layout, PandurangapuramAndhra University P.O., Visakhapatnam-530003.

    Dr. J. Charles Jeeva,
    Principal Scientist, ICAR-CMFRI

References

Arkema, K. K., Abramson, S. C. and Dewsbury, B. M. 2006. Marine ecosystem‐based management: from characterization to implementation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(10): 525-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[525:MEMFCT]2.0.CO;2

Devaraj, M. and Vivekanandan, E. 1999. Marine capture fisheries of India: challenges and opportunities. Current Science, 76 (3): 314-332.

Dutta, J., Sen, T., Mitra, A., Zaman, S. And Mitra, A. 2020. Brief commentary on the impact of global climate change on fisheries and aquaculture with special reference to India. Bangladesh J. Zool, 48(2): 457-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/bjz.v48i2.52382

Edwards, L. Allen. and Kilpatrick, F.P. 1948. A technique for the construction of attitude scales. J. of Appl. Psycol, pp: 32, 374-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057313

Edwards, A.L. 1969. Techniques of attitude scale construction. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Private Ltd. 9 Sport Road, Ballard Estate, Bombay (Mumbai) 1p.

Hall, O.M. 1934. Attitude and unemployment. Arch. Psychology. No. 169.

Johnson, J. E., Allain, V., Basel, B., Bell, J. D., Chin, A., Dutra, L. X. and Nicol, S. 2020. Impacts of climate change on marine resources in the Pacific Island region. Climate change and impacts in the Pacific, 359-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32878-8_10

Kjaer, A. M. 2023. Governance. John Wiley & Sons.

Kerlinger, F.N., 1965. Foundation of Behavioural Research: Educational and Psychological Inquiry. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc: New York.

Kerlinger, F.N. 1995. Foundations of behavioural research. Prism Books Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore.

Knoke, D. 2019. Organizing for collective action: The political economies of associations. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351328722

Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitude. Arch. Psychology, No. 140.

Macher, C., Steins, N. A., Ballesteros, M., Kraan, M., Frangoudes, K., Bailly, D. and Ulrich, C. 2021. Towards trans-disciplinary decision-support processes in fisheries: experiences and recommendations from a multidisciplinary collective of researchers. Aquatic Living Resources, 34: 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2021010

McNeill, A., Clifton, J. and Harvey, E. S. 2018. Attitudes to a marine protected area are associated with perceived social impacts. Marine Policy, 94: 106-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.020

Narayanakumar, R., Jayasankar, J., Shyam, S. S., Ganga, U. and Vivekanandan, E. 2017. Economic valuation of net social benefit of seasonal fishing ban in selected maritime states of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 64(3), 85-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2017.64.3.65197-12

Potts, W. M., Downey‐Breedt, N., Obregon, P., Hyder, K., Bealey, R. and Sauer, W. H. 2020. What constitutes effective governance of recreational fisheries? - A global review. Fish and Fisheries, 21(1): 91-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12417

Rajeev, M. and Bhandarkar, S. 2022. Fisheries Sector in India—An Overview. Unravelling Supply Chain Networks of Fisheries in India: The Transformation of Retail, 47-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7603-1_4

Ramachandran, C. 2004. Teaching Not to Finish: A constructivist perspective on reinventing a responsible marine fisheries extension system. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kerala, India.

Shinoj, P. and Ramachandran, C. 2017. Taming the fishing blues- reforming the marine fishery regulatory regime in India. Economic & Political Weekly, LII(45): 73-81.

Shinoj, P. and Ramachandran, C. 2018. Marine Fishery Regulations and Policies for Conservation in India. In: Recent Advances in Fishery Biology techniques for Biodiversity Evaluation and Conservation. ICAR-CMFRI-Winter School, Dec 1-21, 2018 at CMFRI, Kochi-Manual. pp 360-371.

Stafford, R. 2019. Sustainability: A flawed concept for fisheries management?. Elem Sci Anth, 7:8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.346

Trochta, J. T., Pons, M., Rudd, M. B., Krigbaum, M., Tanz, A. and Hilborn, R. 2018. Ecosystem-based fisheries management: perception on definitions, implementations, and aspirations. PloS one, 13(1): e0190467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190467

Weiand, L., Unger, S., Rochette, J., Müller, A. and Neumann, B. 2021. Advancing ocean governance in marine regions through stakeholder dialogue processes. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8: 645576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.645576

Downloads

Submitted

2024-11-01

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

P. Sandeep, Jeeva, J. C., P. S. Ananthan, V. Geethalakshmi, S. S. Raju, & S. D. Argade. (2025). Development of a scale to measure the perception of stakeholders towards marine fisheries governance: A methodological approach from a case study in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.21077/ijf.2025.72.4.169233-14
Citation