Precision dairy farming: Opportunities and challenges for India


Abstract views: 542 / PDF downloads: 284

Authors

  • PRAKASH KUMAR RATHOD International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Telangana 502 324 India
  • SREENATH DIXIT International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, Telangana 502 324 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i8.109207

Keywords:

Dairy herd management, Information and communication technology (ICT), Precision dairy farming (PDF), Radio frequency identification (RFID)

Abstract

Effective management of a dairy farm has to focus on individual animal apart from group or herd management since 'smallest production unit in the dairy is the individual animal’. In this context, precision dairy farming (PDF) aims to manage the basic production unit in order to exploit its maximal production capacity. PDF is the use of information and technology based farm management system to measure physiological, behavioural and production indicators of individual animals to improve management strategies, profitability and farm performance. PDF applications are finding their way on dairy farms, although there seem to be differences in the uptake of PDF applications between dairy systems. The authors have attempted to identify different PDF tools utilized across the globe and have highlighted the status of adoption in Indian scenario by highlighting about few farms/organizations involved in its utilization and uptake over the years. In this direction, the authors have also focused on several benefits and challenges faced by developing countries including India since the benefits are often not immediately apparent and they require more management expertise along with an investment of time and money to realize. In addition, the adoption rate depends on various factors like farmer education, farm size, perceptions of risk, ownership of a non-farm business etc. Addressing these issues is very essential for the uptake of technologies and hence, an effort has been made to propose strategies for adoption and operationalization of PDF in India and other developing countries where the similar scenario exists. The study also highlights that PDF in many developing countries including India is in its infancy, but there are tremendous opportunities for improvements in individual animal and herd management in dairy farms. The progressive farmers or the farmers’ groups, with guidance from the public and private sectors, and professional associations, can adopt it on a limited scale as the technology shows potential for raising yields and economic returns on fields with significant variability, and for minimizing environmental degradation. Additional research needs to be undertaken to examine the adoption process for not only successful adoption of technology, but also to solve the issues associated with the technology adoption. Further, right extension approaches and advisory services for the farmers interested in PDF needs to be undertaken for its effective application under different socio-economic and ecological conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalseth E. 2005. Fresh cow management: What is important, what does it cost, and what does it return?. In: Proceedings of the 7th Western Dairy Management Conference, Reno, NV. pp: 1–12.

Aware A M and Kshirsagar U A. 2017. Design of milkotester for fat and CLR measurement using Arduino microcontroller. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and Technology 4(5): 13–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2017.4503

Babalobi O O. 2007. Veterinary geographic information systems applications in Nigeria: limitations, challenges and needs. Veterinaria Italiana 43(3): 491–99.

Banhazi T M, Lehr H, Black J L, Crabtree H, Schofield P, Tscharke M and Berckmans D. 2012. Precision livestock farming: an international review of scientific and commercial aspects. International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Engineering 5(3): 1–9.

Batte M T and Arnholt M W. 2003. Precision farming adoption and use in Ohio: case studies of six leading-edge adopters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 38(2): 125–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(02)00143-6

Beauchemin K and Penner G. 2009. New Developments in Understanding Ruminal Acidosis in Dairy Cows. Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference. April 21 and 22, 2009. pp. 1–12

Bell C J. 2002. Internet Delivery of Short Courses for Farmers: A case study of a course on Precision Agriculture. Publication No. 02/085, Project No. GOC-1A, A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

Berger R and Hovav A. 2013. Using a dairy management information system to facilitate precision agriculture: The case of the AfiMilk® System. Information Systems Management 30(1): 21–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2013.739885

Bewley J. 2009. Precision Dairy Farming: Opportunities, Challenges, and Solutions. The Dairy Practices Council, 40th Annual Conference held at Latham, NY during 4–6th November, 2009.

Bewley J and Schutz M M. 2009. Potential of Using New Technology for Estimating Body Condition Scores. Eighteenth Annual Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA. pp. 24–37.

Bewley J. 2010. Precision Dairy Farming: Advanced Analysis Solutions for Future Profitability. In: First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Toranto, Canada during 2–5 March, 2010

Bewley J. 2013. New technologies in precision dairy management. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology 25: 141–59.

Bewley J. 2016. Opportunities for monitoring and improving animal welfare using precision dairy monitoring technologies. Journal of Animal Science 94(2): 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/msasas2016-023

Borchers M R and Bewley J M. 2015. An assessment of producer precision dairy farming technology use, prepurchase considerations, and usefulness. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 4198–4205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8963

Bos J M, Bovenkerk B, Feindt P H and van Dam Y K. 2018. The quantified animal: Precision livestock farming and the ethical implications of objectification. Food Ethics 2: 77–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-018-00029-x

Brosh A, Henkin Z, Ungar E D, Dolev A, Orlov A, Yehuda Y and Aharoni Y. 2006. Energy cost of cows’ grazing activity: use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation. Journal of Animal Science 84(7): 1951–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-315

Driessen C and Heutinck L. 2015. Cows desiring to be milked? Milking robots and the co-evolution of ethics and technology on Dutch dairy farms. Agriculture and Human Values 32(1): 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9515-5

Eastwood C, Chapman D and Paine M. 2004. Precision dairy farming-taking the microscope to dairy farm management.

Eastwood C and Jago J. 2012. Precision dairy farming in New Zealand and Australia: A discussion document for trans- Tasman collaboration between Dairy NZ and Dairy Australia. Report produced for Dairy NZ and Dairy Australia. Rural Innovation Research Group, University of Melbourne.

Eastwood C, Chapman D and Paine M. 2012. Networks of practice for co-construction of agricultural decision support systems: Case studies of precision dairy farms in Australia. Agricultural Systems 108: 10–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.12.005

Eastwood C, Jago J, Edwards J and Burke J. 2015. Getting the most out of advanced farm management technologies: Roles of technology suppliers and dairy industry organisations in supporting precision dairy farmers. Animal Production Science 56: 1752–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN141015

Eastwood C R, Klerkx L and Nettle R. 2017. Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. Journal of Rural Studies 49: 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008

Eastwood C R, Klerkx L, Ayre M and Dela Rue B. 2019. Managing socio-ethical challenges in the development of smart farming: from a fragmented to a comprehensive approach for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32: 741–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5

Edwards J L and Tozer P R. 2004. Using activity and milk yield as predictors of fresh cow disorders. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 524–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73192-6

Edwards J P, Dela Rue B T and Jago J G. 2015. Evaluating rates of technology adoption and milking practices on New Zealand dairy farms. Animal Production Science 55: 702–09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14065

Eigenberg R A, Brown-Brandl T M and Nienaber J A. 2008. Sensors for dynamic physiological measurements. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62(1): 41–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.08.011

Endres M. 2017. Automated calf feeder systems: What we learned from farms in the upper Midwest USA. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.

Endres M. 2018. 74 automated milk feeders for pre-weaned dairy calves in the upper midwest United States. Journal of Animal Science 96(2): 38–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky073.072

Friggens N C and Chagunda M G G. 2005. Prediction of the reproductive status of cattle on the basis of milk progesterone measures: model description. Theriogenology 64: 155–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.11.014

Friggens N C, Ridder C and Lovendahl P. 2007. On the use of milk composition measures to predict the energy balance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 5453–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-821

Gans C. 2017. Edge Computing and Dairy Farming: Opportunities and Challenges. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.

Ghose A, Dey J and Dwary P. 2019. Application of GIS on small farm and dairy management: SARSA Green, Durgapur, West- Bengal. Available at https: //www.geospatialworld.net/article/application-of-gis-on-small-farm-and-dairy-managementsarsa-green-durgapur-west-bengal/.

Gonzalez L, Tolkamp B, Coffey M and Ferret A. 2008. Changes in feeding behaviour as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91(3): 1017–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0530

Grieve D G, Korver S, Rijpkema Y S and Hof G. 1986. Relationship between milk composition and some nutritional parameters in early lactation. Livestock Production Science 14: 239–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90083-7

Hamrita T K, Hamrita S K, Van Wicklen G, Czarick M and Lacy M P. 1997. Use of biotelemetry in measurement of animal responses to environmental stressors. ASAE Paper 97-4008. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.

Heuer C, Van Straalen W M, Schukken Y H, Dirkzwager A and Noordhuizen J P T M. 2001. Prediction of energy balance in high yielding dairy cows with test-day information. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 471–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74497-9

Higgins V, Bryant M, Howell A and Battersby J. 2017. Ordering adoption: Materiality, knowledge and farmer engagement with precision agriculture technologies. Journal of Rural Studies 55: 193–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.011

Hogeveen H. 2017. The value of precision dairy farming: Going beyond labor savings. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp. 112.

Holdsworth R J and Markillie N A R. 1982. Evaluation of pedometers for estrus detection in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 111: 16–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.111.1.16

INAPH-NDDB. 2019. Information Network for Animal Productivity & Health (INAPH). Available at http: //inaph.nddb.coop/Index.aspx Johnson C P and Johnson J. 2001. GIS: A Tool for Monitoring and Management of Epidemics. Map India 2001 Conference, New Delhi, February 2001.

Kamphuis C, Steeneveld W and Hogeveen H. 2015. Economic modelling to evaluate the benefits of precision livestock farming technologies. Pages 87–94 in Precision Farming Applications. I. Halachmi (ed.). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. EAAP/EU-PLF joint Conference, 25–27 August 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-815-5_3.2

Khatun M, Clark C, Lyons N, Thomson P, Kerrisk K and Garcia S. 2017. Early detection of clinical mastitis from electrical conductivity data in an automatic milking system. Animal Production Science, 57: 1226–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16707

Kuip A. 1987. Animal Identification. Third Symposium Automation in Dairying, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 12–17.

Laca E A. 2009. Precision livestock production: tools and concepts. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38: 123–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001300014

Lovendahl P and Chagunda M G G. 2010. On the use of physical activity monitoring for estrus detection in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93: 249–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1721

Lukas J M, Reneau J K, Wallace R, Hawkins D and Munoz-Zanzi C. 2009. A novel method of analyzing daily milk production and electrical conductivity to predict disease onset. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 5964–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2066

Maatje K, Rossing W and Wiersma F. 1987. Temperature and activity measurements for oestrus and sickness detection in dairy cattle. Third Symposium on Automation in Dairying, Wageningen, the Netherlands. pp. 239–49

Maltz E. 2000. Precision agriculture in dairying: individual management by automatic milking systems. Robotic milking: Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Lelystad, The Netherlands, 17–19 August, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Mandal D and Ghosh S K. 2000. Precision farming – The emerging concept of agriculture for today and tomorrow. Current Science 79: 1644–47.

Mazrier H, Tal S, Aizinbud E and Bargai U. 2006. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 47(9): 883– 86.

Meijer R. 2010. The use of precision dairy farming in feeding and nutrition. First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, Toranto, Canada.

National Research Council (NRC). 1997. Committee on Assessing Crop Yield: Site- Specific Farming Information Systems and Research Opportunities. Precision Agriculture in the 21st Century: Geospatial and Information Technologies in Crop Management National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

Owens F N, Secrist D S, Hill W J and Gill D R. 1998. Acidosis in cattle: A review. Journal of Animal Science 6: 275–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761275x

Parsons D J, Darren M G, Charles P S and Whittemore C T. 2007. Real-time control of pig growth through an integrated management system. Biosystems Engineering 96(2): 257–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.10.013

Phillips N, Mottram T, Poppi D, Mayer D and McGowan M R. 2010. Continuous monitoring of ruminal pH using wireless telemetry. Animal Production Science 50: 72–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN09027

Quimby W F, Sowell B F, Bowman J G P, Branine M E, Hubbert M E and Sherwood H W. 2001. Application of feeding behaviour to predict morbidity of newly received calves in a commercial feedlot. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 81: 315–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/A00-098

Redden K D, Kennedy A D, Ingalls J R and Gilson T L. 1993. Detection of estrus by radio telemetric monitoring of vaginal and ear skin temperature and pedometer measurements of activity. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 713–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77394-4

Reddy S. 2012. Scope of precision tools in livestock management. Proceedings of Agro-Informatics and Precision Agriculture 2012 (AIPA 2012) during 1–3 August, 2012 at International Institute of Information Technology (IIIT), Hyderabad. pp. 117–122

Roche J R, Friggens N C, Kay J K, Fisher M W, Stafford K J and Berry D P. 2009. Invited review: Body condition score and its association with dairy cow productivity, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 5769–5801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2431

Ruhil A P and Mohanty T K. 2011. Development of Wireless Sensor Network for Animal Management. National workshop on Reclaiming Research in Livestock Development through Policy Interventions- 12 Potential Innovations in Livestock Development Which Demand Policy Support held at IGNOU, New Delhi during 26 – 27, April 2011.

Ruhil A P, Mohanty T K, Rao S V N, Lathwal S S and Venkata Subramanian V. 2013. Radio-frequency identification: A cost effective tool to improve livestock sector. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(9): 871–79.

Russell R A and Bewley J M. 2013. Characterization of Kentucky dairy producer decision-making behaviour. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 4751–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6538

Rutten C J, Kamphuis C, Hogeveen H, Huijps K, Nielen M and Steeneveld W. 2017. Sensor data on cow activity, rumination, and ear temperature improve prediction of the start of calving in dairy cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 132: 108–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.009

Samad A, Murdeshwar P and Hameed Z. 2010. High-credibility RFID-based animal data recording system suitable for smallholding rural dairy farmers. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture 73: 213–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.05.001

Schirmann K, von Keyserlingk M A G, Weary D M, Veira D M and Heuwieser W. 2009. Validation of a system for monitoring rumination in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 6052– 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2361

Schroder U J and Staufenbiel R. 2006. Methods to determine body fat reserves in the dairy cow with special regard to ultrasonographic measurement of backfat thickness. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72064-1

Schwager M, Anderson D M, Butler Z and Rus D. 2007. Robust classification of animal tracking data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 56(1): 46–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.01.002

Singh A K and Chopra U K. 2007. Geoinformatics Applications in Agriculture. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi. pp- 325.

Singh A K, Ghosh S, Roy B, Tiwari D K and Baghel R P S. 2014a. Application of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology in dairy herd management. International Journal of Livestock Research 4(1): 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ijlr.20140208085018

Singh S P, Ghosh S, Lakhani G P, Jain A and Roy B. 2014b. Precision dairy farming: The next dairy marvel. Journal of Veterinary Science and Technology 5: 164.

Sowell B F, Bowman J G P, Branine M E and Hubbert M E. 1998. Radio frequency technology to measure feeding behaviour and health of feedlot steers. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 59: 277–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00110-5

Steeneveld W, Tauer L W, Hogeveen H and Oude Lansink A G J M. 2012. Comparing technical efficiency of farms with an automatic milking system and a conventional milking system. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 7391–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5482

Steeneveld W and Hogeveen H. 2015. Characterization of Dutch dairy farms using sensor systems for cow management. Journal of Dairy Science 98: 709–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8595

Stein S. 2017. Activity- based heat detection with the smaXtec intra-ruminal bolus system. Conference on Precision Dairy Farming held at Hyatt Regency, Lexington, KY during May 30–June 1, 2017. pp 112.

Spilke J and Fahr R. 2003. Decision support under the conditions of automatic milking systems using mixed linear models as part of a precision dairy farming concept. Pages 780–785 in EFITA 2003 Conference, Debrecen, Hungary.

Trevarthen A and Michael K. 2008. The RFID-enabled dairy farm: towards total farm management. International Conference on Mobile Business (pp. 241–250). Spain: IEEE Computer Society. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB.2008.39

Ursinus W W, Schepers F, de Mol R M, Bracke M B M, Metz J H M and Groot Koerkamp P W G. 2009. COWEL: a decision support system to assess welfare of husbandry systems for dairy cattle. Animal Welfare 18(4): 545–52.

Urton G, von Keyserlingk M A G and Weary D M. 2005. Feeding behaviour identifies dairy cows at risk for metritis. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 2843–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72965-9

Valenza A, Giordano J O, Lopes G, Vincenti L, Amundson M C and Fricke P M. 2012. Assessment of an accelerometer system for detection of estrus and treatment with gonadotropinreleasing hormone at the time of insemination in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 7115–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5639

Van Asseldonk M A P M, Huirne R B M, Dijkhuizen A A, Beulens A J M and Udink ten Cate A J. 1999. Information needs and information technology on dairy farms. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 22(2–3): 97–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00010-1

Weary D M, Huzzey J M and von Keyserlingk M A G. 2009. Using behaviour to predict and identify ill health in animals. Journal of Animal Science 87: 770–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1297

Williams M E and Esslemont R J. 1993. A decision support system using milk progesterone tests to improve fertility in commercial dairy herds. Veterinary Records 132(20): 503–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.132.20.503

Yousefpour A, Fung C, Nguyen T, Kadiyala K, Jalali F, Niakanlahiji A, Kong J and Jue J P. 2019. All one needs to know about fog computing and related edge computing paradigms: A complete survey. Journal of Systems Architecture 98: 289–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.02.009

Yule I J and Eastwood C R. 2012. Challenges and opportunities for precision dairy farming in New Zealand. 11th International Conference on Precision Agriculture at Indianapolis, Indiana, USA during July 15–18th, 2012.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-01-04

Published

2021-01-06

Issue

Section

Review Article

How to Cite

RATHOD, P. K., & DIXIT, S. (2021). Precision dairy farming: Opportunities and challenges for India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 90(8), 1083-1094. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i8.109207
Citation