Nutritional evaluation of some Indian tree leaves and herbs as fodder and defaunating agent in sheep


Abstract views: 249 / PDF downloads: 97

Authors

  • A SANTRA Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, West Bengal
  • S A KARIM Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, Rajasthan 304 501 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95018

Keywords:

Ciliate protozoa, Enzyme profile, Fodder quality, Herbs, In vitro rumen fermentation, Tree leaves

Abstract

Nutritional evaluation as a fodder and defaunating agent of four multipurpose tree leaves namely Ficus religiosa (Pipal), Ficus bengalensis (Bargad), Mangifera indica (Mango), Enterolobium timoba (Jungle jalebi) and two herbs namely Agave americana (Ramkanta) and Plantago major (Isafghol) was done in vitro. The mean content of OM, CP, EE, NDF, ADF, cellulose and lignin of these tree leaves and herbs were 88.6, 12.6, 2.4, 46.2, 33.5, 25.8 and 7.3% on DM basis, respectively. Enterolobium timoba leaves contained highest amount of CP (22.5%) while highest amount of ADF and lignin content was observed in Ficus bengalensis (41.1% / 12.1%) leaves. Total rumen protozoa as well as Holotrich and spirotrich protozoa number became zero due to inclusion of Agave americana and Enterolobium timoba leaves in the incubation media. Total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) and propionate production was higher where as NH3–N production was lower due to addition of Agave americana leaves in the incubation media. Highest IVTDMD and IVTOMD (61.4% / 64.1%) were observed for the Agave americana followed by Enterolobium timoba (59.8% / 62.5%) and Plantago major (57.5% / 59.2%) leaves. Activity of polysaccharide degrading enzymes like carboxymethyl cellulase and xylanase improved due to addition of Agave americana and Enterolobium timoba leaves in the incubation media. However, activity of β-glucosidase enzyme was similar among all the tested tree leaves and herbs. As a defaunating agent (removal of rumen protozoa / anti ciliate protozoal activity), Agave americana leaves were more effective in comparison to Plantage major leaves. The results indicated that among the tested tree leaves and herbs, Agave americana, Enterolobium timoba and Plantago major were good tree fodder for feeding to the animals and leaves of Agave americana and Enterolobium timoba could be used as defaunating agent for reducing rumen protozoal population to improve animal productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 1995. Official Method of Analysis, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA.

Agarwal N, Kewalramani N, Kamra D N, Agarwa D K and Nath K. 1991. Hydrolytic enzymes of buffalo rumen: comparison of cell free fluid, bacterial and protozoal fractions. Buffalo Journal 7: 203–07.

Agarwal N, Kamra D N, Chaudhary L C and Patra A K. 2006. Effect of Sapindus mukorossi extracts on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation characterestics in buffalo rumen liquor. Journal of Applied Animal Reearch 30: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2006.9706814

Bakshi M P S and Wadhwa M. 2007. Tree leaves as complete feed for goat bucks. Small Ruminant Research 69: 74–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.12.009

Bakshi M P S and Wadhwa M. 2012. Comparative nutritional evaluation of forest tree leaves and wild grasses of semi hilly arid zone in Punjab. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82: 918–21.

Barnett J G A and Reid R I. 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from grass by rumen liquor in artificial rumen. 1. Volatile acid production from grass. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 40: 315–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600031671

Bhatta R, Saravanan M, Baruah I, Malik P K and Sampath K T. 2017. Nutrient composition, rate of fermentation and in vitro rumen methane output from tropical feedstuffs. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 155: 171–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859616000642

Bird S H and Leng R A. 1984. Further studies on the effects of the presence or absence of protozoa in the rumen on live weight gain and wool growth in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 607–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19840127

Cheeke P R. 2000. Actual and potential application of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria saponins in human and animal nutrition. Proceeding of American Society of Animal Sciences 77: 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9339-7_25

Coleman G S. 1980. Rumen ciliate protozoa. Advance Parasitology 18: 121–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60399-1

Datt C, Chabra A, Bujarbaruah K M, Dhiman K R and Singh N P. 2007. Nutritional evaluation of tree leaves and shrubs as fodder for ruminants in Tripura. Indian Journal of Dairy Sciences 60: 184–90.

Datt C, Datta M and Singh N P. 2008. Assessment of fodder quality of leaves of multipurpose trees in subtropical humid DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0035-2

climate of India. Journal of Forestry Research 19: 209–14.

Diaz A, Avendan O M and Escobar A. 1993. Evaluation of Sapindus saponaria as a defaunating agent and its effect on different ruminal digestion parameters. Livestock Research Rural Development 5 (epublication: http://www.cipav.org.co/Irrd/Irrd5 cefe.htm).

Dijkstra J and Tamminga S. 1995. Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fibre in the rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 74: 617–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950166

Duncan B B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics 11: 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478

Forsberg C W and Cheng K J. 1992. Molecular strategies to optimize forage and cereal digestion by ruminants, pp. 107– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-9259-5.50012-1

Biotechnology and Nutrition. (Eds) Bills D D and Kung S D. Butterworth Heinmann, Stoneham, UK.

Goel G, Makkar H P S and Becker K. 2008. Changes in microbial community structure, methanogenesis and rumen fermentation in response to saponins rich fraction from different plant materials. Journal of Applied Microbiology 105: 770–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03818.x

Hristov A N, Ivan M, Neill L and McAllister T A. 2003. Evaluation of several potential bioactive agents for reducing protozoal activity in vitro. Animal Feed Science Technology 105: 163– 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00060-9

Hristov A N, Kennington L R, McGuire M A and Hunt C W. 2005. Effect of diet containing linoleic acid or oleic acid-rich oils on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility, performance and fatty acid composition of adipose and muscle tissues of finishing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 83: 1312–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8361312x

Hungate R E. 1966. The rumen protozoa, pp. 92–147. The Rumen and its Microbes. Academic Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3308-6.50006-1

Ivan M, Neill L and Entz T. 2000. Ruminal fermentation and duodenal flow following progressive inoculations of fauna free wethers with major individual species of ciliate protozoa total fauna. Journal of Animal Science 78: 750–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.783750x

Ivan M, Mir P S, Mir Z, Entz T, He M L and McAllister T A. 2004. Effects of dietary sunflower seeds on rumen protozoa and growth of lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 92: 303–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN20041178

Jouany J P. 1996. Effect of rumen protozoa on nitrogen utilization by ruminants. Journal of Nutrition 126: 1335S–46S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/126.suppl_4.1335S

Jouany J P and Ushida K. 1999. The role of protozoa in feed digestion – review. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 12: 113–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.113

Lee S S, Ha J K and Cheng K J. 2000. Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa and fungi to in vivo degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions. Applied Environmental Microbiology 66: 3807–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.3807-3813.2000

Leng R A. 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of poor quality forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3: 277–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR19900016

Newbold C J, Lasalas B and Jouany J P. 1995. The importance of methanogens associated with ciliate protozoa in ruminal methane production in vitro. Letters in Applied Microbiology 21: 230–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01048.x

Newbold C J, El Hassan S K, Wang J, Ortega M E and Wallace R J. 1997. Influence of foliage from African multipurpose trees on activity of rumen protozoa and bacteria. British Journal of Nutrition 78: 237–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19970143

Patra A K and Saxena J. 2009. The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. Nutrition Research Reviews 22: 204–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422409990163

Patra A K and Saxena J. 2010. A new perspective on the use of plant secondary metabolites to inhibit methanogenesis in the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.201041275

rumen. Phytochemistry 71: 1198–1222.

Patra A K, Kamra D N and Agarwal N. 2006a. Effect of plant extract on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme activities and fermentation of feed in rumen liquor of buffalo. Animal Feed Science Technology 128: 276–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.11.001

Patra A K, Kamra D N and Agarwal N. 2006b. Effect of plant containing secondary metabolites on in vitro methanogenesis, enzyme profile and fermentation of feed with rumen liquor of buffalo. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 6: 203–13.

Pen B, Sar C, Mwenya B, Kuwaki K, Morikawa R and Takahashi J. 2006. Effects of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria extracts on in vitro rumen fermentation and methane emission. Animal Feed Science Technology 129: 175–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.002

Santoso B, Kilmaskossub A and Sambodo P. 2007. Effects of saponins from Biophytum petersianum Klotzsch on ruminal fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen utilization in goats. Animal Feed Science Technology 137: 58– 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.10.005

Santra A and Karim S A. 2000. Growth performance of faunated and defaunated lambs. Animal Feed Science Technology 86: 251–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00161-9

Santra A, Karim S A, Mishra A S, Chaturvedi O H and Prasad R. 1998. Rumen ciliate protozoa and fibre utilization in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research 30: 13–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(98)00078-9

Santra A, Banerjee A and Das S K. 2013. Effect of vegetable oils on ciliate protozoa, methane yield, enzyme profile and rumen fermentation in vitro. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 13: 181–93.

Shingfield K J, Ahvenjarvi S, Toivonen V, Vanhatalo A, Huhtanen P and Griinari J M. 2008. Effect of incremental levels of sunflower-seed oil in the diet on ruminal lipid metabolism in lactating cows. British Journal of Nutrition 99: 971–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114507853323

Singh I, Hundal J S, Wadhwa M and Lamba J S. 2018. Assessment of potential of some tannins and saponins containing herbs on digestibility of nutrients, fermentation kinetics and enteric methane production under different feeding systems: An in vitro study. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88: 443–52.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Tilley J M A and Terry R A. 1963. A two stage technique for in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society 18: 104–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x

Trinci A P J, Davies D R, Gull K, Michelle I, Lawrence G, Bettina B N, Andre R M and Theodoru E. 1994. Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals. Mycology Research 98: 129–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80178-0

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Sciences 74: 3585–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Veira D M, Ivan M and Jui P Y. 1983. Rumen ciliate protozoa: effects on digestion in the stomach of sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 1015–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(83)81896-7

Weatherburn M W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39: 971–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045

Downloads

Submitted

2019-11-01

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SANTRA, A., & KARIM, S. A. (2019). Nutritional evaluation of some Indian tree leaves and herbs as fodder and defaunating agent in sheep. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(10), 1128–1134. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95018
Citation