Influence of Annual Ornamental Flowers (Asteraceae) on the Relative Abundance of Honey Bee Species in the Hot Semi-arid Environment

Dipak Kumar Gupta; A K Shukla; Keerthika A; M B Noor Mohamed; B L Jangid

doi:10.56093/aaz.v59i1 & 2.103046

Authors

Dipak Kumar Gupta ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali-Marwar 306 401, India
A K Shukla ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali-Marwar 306 401, India
Keerthika A ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali-Marwar 306 401, India
M B Noor Mohamed ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Regional Research Station, Pali-Marwar 306 401, India
B L Jangid ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Jodhpur 342 005, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v59i1%20&%202.103046

Abstract

Honey bees are an important component of the agricultural ecosystem and provide valuable pollination service. Cultivation of annual ornamental flowering plants is being recognized as a suitable options to compensate for the loss of natural floral resources for conserving the declining population of the honey bee. The capitulum/ inflorescence of commonly grown annual ornamental flowers of the Asteraceae family differs in morphology. The morphology of flowers affects the abundance and diversity of bee species. Therefore, the present study was conducted with an aim to study the influence of commercially cultivated flowering plants of India (Calendula officinalis, Chrysanthemum indicum, Glebionis segetum, Tagetes patula and Tagetes erecta) on honey bee diversity and abundance in the hot semi-arid environment. The capitulum of these plant species differed significantly in length and diameter of the corolla tube. It was observed that dwarf (Apis florea) and giant (Apis dorsata) honey bee were the most common visitors, however, the abundance of both bee species was significantly different (P<0.01) on different plant species. Plants with relatively longer (15.25-18.9 mm) and wider corolla tube (Tagetes erecta and Tagetes patula) were visited by both the bee species. However, plants having short (5.0-6.5 mm) and narrow (1.0-1.33 mm) corolla tubes (Calendula officinalis, Chrysanthemum indicum, Glebionis segetum) were dominantly visited by only Apis florea. Therefore, the cultivation of Tagetes patula and Tagetes erecta may enhance the population and conservation of both Apis florea and Apis dorsata, while Calendula officinalis, Chrysanthemum indicum, and Glebionis segetum may only enhance the population of Apis florea in the arid and semi-arid zone of India. Key words: Flower size, Apis dorsata, Apis florea, arid region, foraging behavior

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biesmeijer, J.C., Roberts, S.P., Reemer, M. et al., 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313: 351-354. Chakrabarty, S.K. and Shama, S.P. 2007. Foraging behaviour of honeybees in hybrid seed production of sunflower (Helianthus annuus).

Fig. 3. Relative abundance of Apis dorsata and Apis florea on the capitula of ornamental flowering plants during entire observation.

ANNUAL ORNAMENTAL FLOWERS AND HONEY BEE ABUNDANCE

Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 77(9): 629631. Courcelles, D.M.M., Button, L. and Elle, E. 2013. Bee visit rates vary with floral morphology among highbush blueberry cultivars (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Journal of Applied Entomology 137: 693-701. Das, B., Krishna, H., Ahmad, N., Ranjan, J.K. and Pragya 2011. Foraging behavior of different major pollinators during blooming period in high altitude apple (Malus Ã— domestica) orchards. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(1): 89-91. Gallai, N., Salles, J.M., Settele, J. and VaissiÃ¨re, B.E. 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecological Economics 68: 810-821. Garbuzov, M., Ratnieks, F.L.W. and Thompson, K. 2013. Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flowervisiting insects. Functional Ecology 28: 364-378. HSG 2017. Horticultural Statistics at a Glance. Horticulture Statistics Division Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government of India. pp 481. HÃ¼lsmann, M., von Wehrden, H., Klein, A.M. and Leonhardt, S.D. 2015. Plant diversity and composition compensate for negative effects of urbanization on foraging bumble bees. Apidologie 46: 760-770. Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B.E., Cane, J.H., SteffanDewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen, C. and Tscharntke, T. 2007. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274(1608): 303-313. Mani, M.S. and Saravanan, J.M. 1999. Pollination Ecology and Evolution in Compositae (Asteraceae). Science Publishers, 166 p. Marzinzig, B., BrÃ¼njes, L., Biagioni, S., Behling, H., Link, W. and Westphal, C. 2018. Bee pollinators of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) differ in their foraging behavior and pollination probability. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment 264: 24-33.

Navarro, L. and Medel, R. 2009. Relationship between ï¬‚oral tube length and nectar robbing in Durantaerecta L. (Verbenaceae). Biological Journal of Linnean Society 96: 392-398. Niem, N.V. and Trung, L.Q. 1999. Morphological comparison of three Asian native honey bees (Apis cerana, A. dorsata, A. florea) in northern Vietnam and Thailand.Biotropica 14: 10-16. Potts, S.G., Biesmeijer, J.C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O. and Kunin, W.E. 2010. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 345-353. Sajjad, A., Saeed, S. and Ali, M. 2017. Yearlong association of Apis dorsata and Apis florea with flowering plants: Planted forest vs. agricultural landscape. Sociobiology 64(1): 18-25. Sihag, R.C. 2014. Phenology of migration and decline in colony numbers and crop hosts of giant honey bee (Apis dorsata F.) in semiarid environment of Northwest India. Journal of Insects: 1-9. Sihag, R.C. and Rathi, A. 1992. Foraging modes and foraging rates of different bee pollination of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pollination in the Tropics, pp 93-95. Stout, J.C. 2000. Does size matter? Bumblebee behavior and the pollination of Cytisus scoparius L. (Fabaceae). Apidologie 31(1): 129-139. Suzuki, K. 1994. Pollinator restriction in the narrow tube flower type of Mertensia ciliata (James) G. Don (Boraginaceae). Plant Species Biology 9: 6973. Tavares, D., Freitas, L. and Gaglianone, M. 2016. Nectar volume is positively correlated with flower size in humming bird-visited flowers in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 32(4): 335-339. Vaudo, A.D., Tooker, J.F., Grozinger, C.M. and Patch, H.M. 2015. Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration. Current Opinion in Insect Science 10: 133-141. Wist, T.J. and Davis, A.R. 2006. Floral nectar production and nectary anatomy and ultrastructure of Echinacea purpurea (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 97: 177-197.