Population Dynamics of Major Sucking Pests of Mung bean in Western Rajasthan and Their Management Using Newer Insecticides

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF MUNG BEAN SUCKING PEST


221 / 233

Authors

  • Dindayal Tanwar College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India
  • M M Kumawat College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India
  • M M Sundria Agricultural Research Station, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India
  • Dama Ram College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i2.135071

Keywords:

Mung bean, bioefficacy, pests, white fly, leafhopper, thrips, weather

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to study the seasonal incidence of major insect pests of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] under arid conditions of Rajasthan. A total of ten treatments were used to evaluate the bio-efficacy of insecticides against three sucking pests viz. leafhopper (Empoasca kerri Pruthi), whitefly (Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and thrips [Caliothrips indicus (Bagnall)]. The incidence of leafhopper, whitefly and thrips began on mung bean in the second week of August peaked in the September, gradually declined thereafter. There was negative significant correlation between leafhoppers and maximum temperature, positive non-significant with whitefly and positive significant correlation between thrips and maximum temperature. Relative humidity showed positive significant correlation with leafhopper and positive non-significant with whitefly and thrips. Out of nine insecticides the standard check of Dimethoate 30 EC was found most effective against population of leafhopper, whitefly and thrips followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG and fipronil 5 SC. Lambda-cyhalothrin 17.8 SL, Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WP as well as Beauveria bassiana 1.15 WP ranked as less effective treatments against leafhoppers, whitefly and thrips. The maximum yield was recorded in the plots treated with thiamethoxam 25 WG. The highest benefit cost ratio was obtained with dimethoate 30 EC followed by thiamethoxam 25 WG, while lowest benefit cost ratio was computed in the plots treated with Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Dindayal Tanwar, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India

    Research Student, Department of Entomology, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur

  • M M Sundria, Agricultural Research Station, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India

    Professor, Agriculture Research Station, Mandor, Jodhpur

  • Dama Ram, College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur 342 304, India

    Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture University, Jodhpur

References

Ahirwar, B., Bhowmick, A.K., Gupta, P.K., Khan, M.A., Sharma, S.R. and Nayak, S. 2015. Efficacy of insecticides against sucking pests and yield of Mung bean. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences 24(1): 34-37.

Anonymous 2020. Annual Progress Report. All India Coordinated Research Project on Arid Legume, CAZRI, Jodhpur-342003.

Anonymous 2021. Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Pulses Development, The Directorate of Pulses Development Publication-2022, Bhopal 462 004, Madhya Pradesh, India

Borah, R.K. 1995. Insect pest complex in summer green gram (Vigna radiate L.). Annals of Agricultural Research 16(1): 91-92.

Dar, M.H., Razvi, P.Q. and Naqvi, N.A. 2002. Insect pest complex and its succession on mung bean and urd bean. Indian Journal of Pulses Research 15(2): 204.

Duraimurugan, P. and Alivelu, K. 2017. Field efficacy of newer insecticides against sucking insect pests in caster. Indian Journal of Plant Protection 45(3): 1-5.

Duraimurugan, P. and K. Tyagi. 2014. Pest spectra, succession and its yield losses in mung bean and urdbean under changing climatic scenario. Legume Research 37(2): 212-222.

Gehlot, L. and Prajapat, A.K. 2020. Seasonal incidence of insect pests on mung bean (Vigna radiata) in correlation with meteorological data. Agricultural Science Digest 41(1): 199-202.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 2012. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. Wiley India Ltd., New Delhi. 680 pp.

Khade, K.N., Undirwade, D.B., Tembhurne, R.D. and Lande, G.K. 2014. Biorational management of sucking pests of cowpea Vigna sinensis (L.). Trends in Biosciences 7(20): 3212-3217.

Kumar, R., Razvi, S.M.S. and Ali, S. 2004. Seasonal and varietal variation in the population of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) and incidence of yellow mosaic virus in urd and mung bean. Indian Journal of Entomology 66(2):155-158.

Marimuthan, T., Subramanian, C.L. and Mohan, R. 1981. Assessment of yield losses due to yellow mosaic infestation in mung bean. Pulse Crop News Letter 1: 104.

Mathur, A., Singh, N.P., Meena, M. and Singh, S. 2012. Seasonal incidence and effect of abiotic factors on population dynamics of major insect pests of brinjal crop. Journal of Environmental Research and Development 7(1A): 431-435.

Nitharwal, M. and Kumawat, K.C. 2013. Population dynamics of insect pests of green gram, Vigna radiata in Semi-Arid region of Rajasthan. Journal of Insect Science 26(1): 90-92.

Patel, R., Marabi, R.S., Nayak, M.K., Tomar, D.S. and Singh, U. 2020. Effect of weather parameters on population dynamics of major defoliator insect pests of green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(2):163-168.

Singh, M., Bairwa, D.K., Dadrwal, B.K. and Chauhan, J. 2019. Screening of green gram genotypes for resistance against sucking insect pests. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8(2): 933-938.

Singh, S.K. and Singh, P.S. 2018. Efficacy of some insecticides and biopesticides againt whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Greengram. Journal of Experimental Zoology, India 21(1): 241-246.

Sujatha, B. and Bharpoda, T.M. 2017. Evaluation of insecticides against sucking pests grown during kharif. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(10): 1258-1268.

Downloads

Submitted

05-04-2023

Published

30-06-2024

How to Cite

Dindayal Tanwar, M M Kumawat, M M Sundria, & Dama Ram. (2024). Population Dynamics of Major Sucking Pests of Mung bean in Western Rajasthan and Their Management Using Newer Insecticides: POPULATION DYNAMICS OF MUNG BEAN SUCKING PEST. Annals of Arid Zone, 63(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i2.135071
Citation