Climatic Variations Influenced Distribution and Productivity of Different Agroforestry Systems in Rajasthan, India
264 / 226
Keywords:
Agroclimatic zones, agroforestry, climatic factors, crop production, dry land.Abstract
Farmers of Rajasthan conserve and promote scattered trees and shrubs growing on farmlands to deal
with climatic adversities. These woody perennials sustain livelihoods by providing economic, social, and environmental benefits. Tree-based farming systems were surveyed in all 10 agroclimatic zones (ACZs) of Rajasthan for screening best models and suggests for further improvement. Trees were assessed for density, and growth parameters in 0.5 ha plots, whereas agricultural crops yields were estimated in
1 m2 plots laid at 1 m from tree trunk, canopy edge and 5 m away from trees canopy (control). There were 107 tree-crop combinations involving 14 trees and 21 crop species. P. cineraria-based systems were dominant in the arid western, whereas A. nilotica dominated in semi-arid to dry sub-humid
regions. Average tree density was 11.7 trees ha-1 ranging from 3.3 tree ha-1 in ACZ-IIIb to 23.6 tree ha-1 in ACZ-IIa. Senegalia senegal showed highest (27.6 tree ha−1) density. Height and canopy diameter were 11.73 m and 10.35 m respectively, in irrigated ACZ- IIIb and decreased to 6.53 m and 5.02 m in ACZ-IIb, respectively. Both height and density decreased with the decrease in rainfall from south-east to north-west. D. sissoo and T. grandis were taller, S. oleoides was thicker and Z. mauritiana was shorter and thinner than other species. Grain yields varied from 0.66 in ACZ-Ia to 1.85 Mg ha-1 in ACZ-IIIa, but exhibited low yield as compared to control. Crop yield reduced by 22.9-47.3% between ACZs, 20.3-56.5% between agroforestry systems, and 15.9-79.8% between intercrops highlighting the interactive effects of these components. S. senegal, T. undulata, P. cineraria, Z. mauritiana, S. oleoides, V. tortilis and P. juliflora based systems showed 29.1-54.9% low, whereas V. nilotica, D. sissoo, A. indica, T. grandis and V. leucophloea based systems showed 4.5-51.7% high yield over the state average. The yield of groundnut (IIIa), cotton (IVa), barley (IIIa), jowar (IVa), maize (IVa), paddy (V), pearl millet (IIIa) and wheat (V) with A. nilotica was above state average
Downloads
References
Ajit, Dhyani S.K., Handa A.K., Newaj R., Chavan S.B., Alam B., Prasad R., Ram A., Rizvi, Jain A.K., Uma, Tripathi D., Shakhela R.R., Patel A.G., Dalvi V.V., Saxena A.K., Parihar A.K.S., Backiyavathy M.R., Sudhagar R.J., Bandeswaran C. and Gunasekaran S. 2016. Estimating carbon sequestration potential of exiting agroforestry system in India. Agrofor. Syst., DOI 10.1007/s10457-016-9986-z.
Alavalapati, J.R., Shrestha, R.K., Stainback, G.A. and Matta, J.R. 2004. Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective. In New Vistas SARVESWARAN ET AL S307 in Agroforestry: A Compendium for 1st World Congress of Agroforestry, 2004 (pp. 299-310). Springer Netherlands.
Barrios E., Sileshi G.W., Shepherd K. and Sinclair F. 2012. Agroforestry and soil health: linking trees, soil biota and ecosystem services. In: Wall, D.H. (Ed.), Soil Ecology and Ecosystem Services. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 315–330.
Bayala J., Sileshi G., Coe R., Kalinganire A., Tchoundjeu Z., Sinclair F. and Garrity D. 2012. Cereal yield response to conservation agriculture practices in drylands of West Africa: A quantitative synthesis. J. Arid Envir., 78: 13–25.
Bezu, A. and Abera, T. 2021. Farmland trees for the improvement of crop yield, soil fertilities, soil and water conservation, and carbon sequestration: A Review. Agricultural Science Research Journal, 11(7): 154-168.
Bhati, T.K., Shalander, K., Amare, H. and Whitbread, A.M. 2017. Assessment of Agricultural Technologies for Dryland Systems in South Asia: A Case Study of Western Rajasthan, India. Patancheru 502 324. Telangana, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 68 pp.
Bhati, T., Tewari J.C.. and Rathore, S. 2004. Productivity dynamics of integrated farming systems in arid western Rajasthan. In: Diversification of arid farming systems, Pratap Narian, Singh, M. P., Kar, A., Kathju, S. and Kumar, P. (Eds.), pp.23-30. Arid Zone Research Association and Scientific Publisher Jodhpur, India.
Brandt, M., Hiernaux,P., Rasmussen, K., Tucker, C., Wigneron, J.-P. et al... 2019. Changes in rainfall distribution promote woody foliage production in the Sahel. Communications Biology, 2019, 2 (1), pp.1-10. ff10.1038/s42003-019-0383-9ff.
Cortez, C.T., Nunes, L., Rodrigues, L.B, Eisenhauer, N. and Araujo, A.S.F. 2014. Soil microbial properties in Eucalyptus grandis plantations of different ages. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 14, 734-742.
Coulibaly, Y.N., Mulia R., Sanou J., Zomabre J., Boyala J., Antoine K. and Van Noordwijk M. 2014. Crop production under different rainfall and management conditions in agroforestry parkland systems in Burkina Faso: Observations and simulation with WaNuLCAS model. Agrofor. Sys., 88(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10457-013-9651-8
Endale, Y., Derero, A., Argaw, M. and Muthuri, C. 2017. Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 26:3, 199-214, DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2016.1266971.
Gao, L, Xu H, Bi H, Xi W, Bao B, Wang X, et al.. 2013. Intercropping Competition between Apple Trees and Crops in Agroforestry Systems on the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS ONE 8(7): e70739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070739
Glover, J.D., Reganold J.P. and Cox C.M. 2012. Agriculture: plant perennials to save Africa's soils. Nature, 489: 359–361.
GoR (2011). Rajasthan State Action Plan on Climate Change, Government of Rajasthan.
GoR (2012). Rajasthan Agriculture Competitiveness Project, Department of Agriculture, Government of Rajasthan.
Harsh, LN, Tewari, JC, Burman, U and Sharma, SK. 1992. Agroforestry in arid regions. Indian Farming, 42: 32-37.
Hussain, M. 2015. Agro-Climatic Zones and Economic Development of Rajasthan. International J. Humanities and Social Sci. Invention, 4(2): 50-57.
Jama, B. and Zeila A. 2005. Agroforestry in the drylands of eastern Africa: a call to action. ICRAF Working Paper – no. 1. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre.
Jinger, D., Kaushal, R., Kumar, R., Paramesh, V., Verma, A., Shukla, M., Chavan, S.B., Kakade, V. et. el…. 2023. Degraded land rehabilitation through agroforestry in India: Achievements, current understanding, and future prospectives. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1088796.
Jose, S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor. Syst., 76: 1-10.
Kahi, C.H., Ngugi R.K., Mureithi S.M. and Ng’ethe J.C. 2009. The canopy effects of Prosopis juliflora (DC.) and Acacia tortilis (HAYNE) trees on herbaceous plants species and soil physico-chemical properties in Njemps Flats, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 10: 441 – 449.
Kaushik, N and Kumar V. 2003. Khejri (Prosopis cineraria) - based agroforestry system for arid Haryana, India. J Arid Envir, 55: 433-440.
Kaushik, N., Tikkoo A., Yadav P.K., Deswal R.P.S. and Singh S. 2017. Agri–Silvi–Horti Systems for Semiarid Regions of North-West India. Agric Res., 6(2): 150–158.
Keerthika, A., Shukla, A.K., Gupta, D.K., Noor-Mohamed, M.B. and Jangid, B.L. 2021. Vachellia nilotica subsp. cupressiformis- status and conservation approach of an endemic agroforestry tree in Rajasthan. Current Science, 120(8): 1293-1294.
Khan, M.A. and Tewari, J.C. 2009. Watershed management for fuel wood and fodder security in traditional agroforestry systems of arid western Rajasthan. Journal of Trop. For. 25: 1-10.
Kumar, S., Haileslassie A., Thiagarajah R. and Wani S.P 2014. Assessing different systems for enhancing farm income and resilience in extreme dry region of India. Ag. Econ. Search http://ageconsearch.umn.edu.
Kuyah, S., Oborn I., Jonsson M., Dahlin A.S., Barrios E., Muthuri C., Malmer A., Nyaga J., Magaju C., Namirembe S., Nyberg Y. and Sinclair F.L. 2016. Trees in agricultural landscapes enhance provision of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Biodiv Sci Eco Serv Mgmt. 12: 255-273.
Leakey, R.R.B., Tchoundjeu, Z, Schreckenberg, K., Schackleton, S. and Schackleton, C.M. 2005. Agroforestry tree products (AFTPs): targeting poverty reduction and enhanced livelihoods. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 3 (1):1-23.
Malhotra, S.P., Trivedi H.S. and Mathur Y.N. 1986. Agroforestry: A judicious use of desert ecosystem by man. Jodhpur: CAZRI, Publication No. 27.
Mankur, M.K., Toppo, P., Singh, L., Verma, A. and Saxena, R.R. 2022. Growth and yield performance of paddy under teak (Tectona grandis) based rice bund plantation in Chhattisgarh. The Pharma Innovation Journal, SP-11(2): 776-781.
Mann, H.S. and Saxena, S.K. (eds). 1980. Khejri (Prosopis cineraria) in the Indian desert its role in agroforestry. CAZRI Monograph No. 11. Jodhpur, India, CAZRI. 93 pp.
Meena, H.M., Santra P., Moharana P.C. and Pandey C.B. 2016. Crop productivity response to rainfall variability in kharif season in arid western Rajasthan. The Ecoscan, 10(1-2): 19-23.
Muthuri, C.W., Ong C.K., Black C.R., Ngumi V.W. and Mat B.A. 2005. Tree and crop productivity in Grevillea, Alnus and Ulownia based agroforestry system in semi-arid Keniya. For. Ecol. Manag., 2012: 34-39.
Nath, D.C., Dattaraja, H.S., Suresh, H.S., Joshi, N.V. and Sukumar, R. 2006. Patterns of tree growth in relation to environmental variability in the tropical dry deciduous forest at Mudumalai, southern India. Journal of Biosciences, 31: 651–669.
Ong, C.K., Kho R.M. and Radersma S. 2004. Ecological interactions in multispecies agroecosystems: concepts and rules. In: Van Noordwijk M, Cadisch G, Ong CK, editors. Below-ground interactions in tropical agroecosystems – concepts and models with multiple plant components. Wallingford (UK): CAB International; p.1–15.
Pappas, C., Peters, R.L. and Fonti, P. 2020. Linking variability of tree water use and growth with species resilience to environmental changes. Ecography, 43(9): 1386-1399.
Puri, S., Bangarwa K.S. and Singh S. 1995. Influence of multipurpose trees on agricultural 513 crops in arid regions of Haryana. India. J Arid Envir., 30: 441-451.
Puri, S., Kumar A. and Singh S. 1994. Productivity of Cicer arietinum (chickpea) under a Prosopis cineraria agroforestry system in the arid regions of India. J. Arid Envir., 27(1): 85-98.
Quandt, A., Neufeldt H. and McCabe J. T. 2017. The role of agroforestry in building livelihood resilience to floods and drought in semiarid Kenya. Ecol. Soc., 22(3): 10. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09461-220310.
Rollinson, C., Kaye, M. and Canham, C. 2015. Interspecific variation in growth responses to climate and competition of five eastern tree species. Ecology. 97: 10.1890/15-1549.1.
SAC 2021. Desertification and land degradation atlas of India (assessment and analysis of changes over 15 years based on remote sensing). Ahmedabad, India: Space Applications Centre.
Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., Van Wilgen, B.W. and Richardson, D.M. 2015. The impact of invasive alien Prosopis species (mesquite) on native plants in different environments in South Africa. South Afr. J. Bot., 97: 25–31.
Shiferaw, H., Alamirew T., Dzikiti, S., Bewket, W., Zeleke, G. and Schaffner, U. 2021. Water use of Prosopis juliflora and its impacts on catchment water budget and rural livelihoods in Afar Region, Ethiopia. Sci. Rep. 11, 2688 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81776-6.
Singh, B. 2016. Project Concluding Report. Managing resources to enhance productivity of Agroforestry system in dry areas of Rajasthan. Arid Forest Research Institute, Jodhpur submitted to Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education, Dehradun.
Singh, G. 2004. "Project concluding Report" of the project entitle "Agroforestry research for sustainable production in arid and semi-arid region of Rajasthan. AFRI, Jodhpur, India. pp – 43.
Singh, G. 2010. Rainfall dependent competition affected productivity of V. radiata in Hardwickia binata agroforestry in Indian desert. Ind For., 136(3): 301-315.
Singh, G. and Rathod T.R. 2016. Productivity of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba in Prosopis cineraria and Tecomella undulata based agroforestry systems in Western arid region of India. Scientia Agriculturae, 13(2): 103-112.
Singh, R.S., Gupta J.P., Rao A.S. and Sharma A.K. 2003. Micro-climatic quantification and drought impacts on productivity of green gram under different cropping systems of arid zones. Pages 74-80 in Human Impact on Desert Environment (Naraian P, Kathju S, Kar A, Singh MP and Praveen Kumar, eds.). Scientific Publisher, Jodhpur (India).
Singh, G. 2009. Comparative productivity of Prosopis cineraria and Tecomella undulata based agroforestry systems in degraded lands of Indian Desert. Journal of Forestry Research, 20(2): 144-150.
Singh, G. and Rathod T.R. 2007a. Growth, production and resource use in Colophospermum mopane-based agroforestry system in northwestern India. Archive of Agronomy & Soil Science, 53 (1) 75-88.
Singh, G. and Rathod T.R. 2007b. Productivity and soil resource availability in Hardwickia binata based agroforestry system in Indian desert. Arid Land Research and Management, 21(3): 193-210.
Singh, G., Mutha S. and Bala N. 2007. Growth and productivity of Prosopis cineraria-based agroforestry system at varying spacing regimes in the arid zone of India. J. Arid Environment, 70(1): 152-163.
Singh, R.B. and Kumar A. 2016. Agriculture dynamics in response to climate change in Rajasthan. The Delhi University J. Humanities and the Social Sci., 3: 115-138.
Singh, B., Bishnoi M., Baloch M.R. and Singh G. 2014. Tree biomass, resource use and crop productivity in agri-horti-silvicultural systems in the dry region of Rajasthan, India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60:8, 1031-1049, DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2013.864386.
Smethurst, P.J., Neil I., Huth N.I., Masikati P., Sileshi G.W., Akinnifesi F.K., Wilson J. and Sinclair F. 2017. Accurate crop yield predictions from modelling tree-crop interactions in gliricidia-maize agroforestry. Agril. Syst., 155: 70–77.
Soju, S. and Meena G.L. (017. Dynamics of livestock population and output in Rajasthan: a temporal analysis. J. Animal Res., 7(2): 345-354.
Swieter, A., Langhof M. and Lamerre J. 2021. Competition, stress and benefits: Trees and crops in the transition zone of a temperate short rotation alley cropping agroforestry system. J Agronomy and Soil Science, 208(2): 209-224.
Tewari, J.C., Ram M., Roy M.M. and Dagar J.C. 2014. Livelihood improvements and climate change adaptations through agroforestry in hot arid environments. J. C. Dagar et al. (eds.), Agroforestry systems in india : Livelihood Security and Ecosystem Services. Advance in agroforestry, 10, DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_6, _ Springer India 2014
Tewari, J.C., Sharma A.K., Naraian P. and Singh R. 2007. Restorative forestry and agroforestry in hot region of India: A Review. J Trop For., 23: 1-16.
Tewari, V.P. and Singh M. 2006. Tree-crop interaction in the Thar Desert of Rajasthan, India. Secheresse, 17(1-2): 326-332.
Toky, O.P. and Bisht R.P. 1992. Observations on the rooting patterns of some agroforestry trees in an arid region of north-western India. Agrofor Syst., 18: 245-263.
Tripathi, G., Ram S., Sharma B.M. and Singh G. 2005. Faunal biodiversity and its role in nutrients turnover in different silvipasture systems of Indian dry zone. Envir Conser., 32(2): 178-188.
Yadav, R.S., Yadav, B.L, Chhippa B.R and Keshwar, G.L. 2005. Nutrient Removal and yield wheat (Triticum aeslivum linn) as influenced by different tree species in agroforestry under semi – arid condition of Rajasthan. Ind. J. Agrofor., 7: 21-24.
Yoda, K., Elbasit M.A., Hoshino B., Nawata H. and Yasuda H. 2012. Root system development of Prosopis seedlings under different soil moisture conditions. J. Arid Land Studies, 22(1): 13-16.
Żywiec, M., Muter, E., Zielonka, T., Delibes, M., Calvo, G. and Fedriani, J.M. 2017. Long-term effect of temperature and precipitation on radial growth in a threatened thermo-Mediterranean tree population. Trees, 31: 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1472-8.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 As per Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.