Residue Management Methods in Wheat Cultivation: A Feasibility Analysis

FEASIBILITY STUDY OF RESIDUE MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT


184 / 195

Authors

  • Abhishek Upadhyay PhD Scholar, Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, ICAR-CIAE, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh-462038, India
  • R. K. Naik Professor, SV CAET&RS, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh -492012, India
  • Prem Veer Gautam Scientist, ICAR-CAZRI, Jodhpur https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3900-1639
  • Arshad Quraishi M.Tech.,CTAE Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur, Rajasthan -313001, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i2.148858

Keywords:

Crop residues, turbo happy seeder, field efficiency, fuel consumption, operating cost.

Abstract

Paddy residues are vital natural resources, and their reuse can significantly improve the physical, chemical, and organic properties of soils, leading to increased crop production. Managing crop residues presents a significant challenge to combine-harvested paddy fields within the rice wheat cultivation system, which is predominantly employed in the Indian subcontinent. This study aims to present the performance evaluation of three sowing methods for wheat in the field after combine harvested paddy crop. The study was conducted at the Instructional Farm of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering Department, Swami Vivekanand College of Agricultural Engineering Technology and Research Station, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India with three sowing methods such as the combination of a rotary mulcher with a zero-till seed cum fertilizer-drill (M1), zero-till seed cum fertilizer-drill (M2), and turbo happy seeder (M3). The field efficiency of tractor-operated implements such as a rotary mulcher, zero-till seed cum fertilizer drill, and turbo happy seeder was measured as 66.1, 69.96, and 70.51%, respectively. The M3 sowing method was the most effective in reducing straw length by 71.02% and incorporating straw into the soil by 51.66%. M1 had a moderate reduction in straw length (41.50%) and a low incorporation rate of 7.37%. In contrast, the M2 method showed the least impact, with no reduction in straw length or soil incorporation. The operating costs per hectare for M3 (Rs. 2099) were significantly lower than those for M2 (Rs. 2300) and M1 (Rs. 3541) because there was less fuel consumption for the operation. So, the turbo happy seeder or M3 method outperformed M1 and M2 in residue and biometric parameters, plus economic analysis. Therefore, M3 can be recommended to use on farmers’ fields for rice residue management after combine harvesting to boost soil health and crop yield.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Prem Veer Gautam, Scientist, ICAR-CAZRI, Jodhpur

    I am posted in the Division of Agricultural Engineering and Renewable Energy, CAZRI, Jodhpur.

References

Chaudhary, A., Chhokar, R., Yadav, D.B., Sindhu, V., Ram, H., Rawal, S., Khedwal, R., Sharma, R. and Gill, S. 2019. In-situ paddy straw management practices for higher resource use efficiency and crop productivity in Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India. Wheat and Barley Research 11. 10.25174/2249-4065/2019/96323.

Choudhary, A., Kadian, K., Meena, M.S., Meena, H. and Prashanth, C. 2021. Farmers’ Perspective to Mitigate Crop Residue Burning in Haryana State of India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 21: 154-160.

Dharmender, C.S., Kumar, A. and Kumar, N. 2022. Effect of tractor forward speed on field performance of zero till seed-cum fertilizer drill

in tilth and un-tilth sandy loam soil. Journal of AgriSearch 9(1): 74-78.

Gautam, P.V., Kushwaha, H.L., Kumar, A. and Kushwaha, D.K. 2019. Mechatronics application in precision sowing: A review. International

Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(4): 1793-1807.

Gautam, P.V., Kushwaha, H.L., Kumar, A., Khura, T.K. and Sarkar, S.K. 2023. Microcontroller based low-cost seed metering module retrofit

on cultivator. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences 30(1): 180-188.

Glithero, N., Ramsden, S.J. and Wilson, P. 2013. Barriers and incentives to the production of bioethanol from cereal straw: A farm business perspective. Energy Policy 59: 161-171. 10.1016/j. enpol.2013.03.003.

Guha, S., Govil, H., Taloor, A.K., Gill, N. and Dey, A. 2021. Land surface temperature and spectral indices: A seasonal study of Raipur City.

Geodesy and Geodynamics 13(1): 72-82. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2021.05.002

Iqbal, M.F., Hussain, M., Faisal, N., Iqbal, J., Rehman, A., Ahmed, M. and Padyar, J. 2017. Happy seeder zero tillage equipment for sowing of wheat in standing rice stubbles. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences (IJARBS). 4. 101-105. 10.22192/ijarbs.2017.04.04.014.

Jat, M.L., Kamboj, B.R., Sidhu, H.S., Singh, M., Bana, A., Bishnoi, D.K., and Jat, H.S. 2013. Operational manual for Turbo Happy Seeder Technology for managing crop residues with environmental stewardship. CIMMYT, ICAR (INDIA), p 28.

Kumar, A., Manda, S., and Jain, M. 2018. Performance evaluation of tractor PTO operated rotary mulcher. Journal of Pharmacognosy and

Phytochemistry 7(6): 1113-1115.

Li, Y., Li, Z., Cui, S., Jagadamma, S. and Zhang, Q. 2019. Residue retention and minimum tillage improve physical environment of the soil in croplands: A global meta-analysis. Soil and Tillage Research 194: 104292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.06.009

Mehta, C.R. and Badegaonkar, U.R. 2023. Sustainable management of crop residues in Bangladesh, India, Nepal and Pakistan: challenges and solutions. South and South-West Asia Development Papers; 23-01.

Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare 2023. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1899193.

Modi, Rajesh U., Manjunatha, K. Gautam, P.V., Nageshkumar, T., Sanodiya, R., Chaudhary, V., Murthy, G.R.K., Srinivas, I. and Rao, C.S.

Climate-Smart Technology based Farm Mechanization for Enhanced Input Use Efficiency. ICAR-NAARM, Hyderabad-500 030.

Ramulu, C., Pateriya, R.N., Naik, M.A., Vishwakarma, D.K., Kuriqi, A., Alataway, A., Dewidar, A.Z. and Mattar, M.A. 2023. A residue management machine for chopping paddy residues in combine harvested paddy field. Scientific Reports 13(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32148-9

Sharma, M., Sahajpal, I., Buyan, A. and Chauhan, A. 2019. Impact Assessment Report for Crop Residue Management Project. New Delhi: Confederation of Indian Industry. https://ciifoundation.in/ document/NewsLetter/CII-Final-CRM-Impact Assessment-Report-05Aug2019.pdf

Shukla, L.N., Sidhu H.S. and Bector V. 2002. Design and development of loose straw thrower attachment for direct drilling machine.

Agricultural Engineering Today 26(3-4): 23-29.

Sidhu, H., Singh, M., Singh, Y., Blackwell, J., Lohan, S.K., Humphreys, E., Jat, M., Singh, V. and Singh, S. 2015. Development and evaluation of the Turbo Happy Seeder for sowing wheat into heavy rice residues in NW India. Field Crops Research 184: 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.07.025

Sidhu, H.S., Singh, M., Humphreys, E., Singh, B., Dhillon, S.S., Blackwell, J., Bector, V., Singh, M. and Singh, S. 2007. The Happy Seeder enables direct drilling of wheat into rice stubble. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47. 10.1071/EA06225.

Singh, A., Kang, J.S., and Kaur, M. 2013. Planting of wheat with happy seeder and rotavator in rice stubbles. Indo-American Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences 1(8):372- 379.

Singh, P., Singh, S., Singh, B.R. and Mishra, D.K. 2014. Performance evaluation of zero-till ferti seed drill in comparison to conventional and reduced tillage methods of wheat crop on the same day. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 4(8): 1-4.

Sofoluwe, N.A., Tijani, A.A. and Baruwa, O.I. 2011. Farmers’ perception and adaptation to climate change in Osun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(20): 4789-4794

Downloads

Submitted

23-02-2024

Published

30-06-2024

How to Cite

Abhishek Upadhyay, A. U., R. K. Naik, R. K. N., Gautam, P. V., & Arshad Quraishi, A. Q. (2024). Residue Management Methods in Wheat Cultivation: A Feasibility Analysis: FEASIBILITY STUDY OF RESIDUE MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT. Annals of Arid Zone, 63(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i2.148858
Citation