Agroforestry Dynamics Among Different Landholding Farmers in Vrishabhavathi Basin, Karnataka

Authors

  • Poornima M Department of Environmental Science, Bangalore University, Bangalore 560 056, India
  • B.C. Nagaraja Department of Environmental Science, Bangalore University, Bangalore 560 056, India

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i4.150816

Keywords:

Agroforestry, peri-urban, semi-arid, reservoir pollution, different landholding farmers

Abstract

The agroforestry emerges as effective adaptation strategy to combat climate change and restrict urban expansion in semi-arid regions of India. The present study aims at understanding the spatial distribution of trees and agroforestry characteristics among small, medium and large landholding farmers around Vrishabhavathi river stretch in peri-urban region of Bangalore. A total of 34379 trees and 41 tree species was recorded in 679.2 ha area belonging to 100 farmers. The major proportion of trees (85 %), belonged to commercial plantation crops such as Areca nut and Coconut. The data indicated significant linear correlation between landholding category and tree density, suggesting that increase in number of trees with increase in land size. Analysis on girth class distribution across landholding indicated that concentration of smaller-sized trees in small and medium landholders, suggesting subsistence-oriented agroforestry practices. An intermediate agroforestry is largely practiced in all three landholding categories, where perennial commercial plantation is done along with food and fodder crops. The study provides insight on agroforestry for farmers, urban planners, agriculture and horticulture functionaries to foster sustainable practices in polluted urban fringe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhtar, N., Syakir Ishak, M.I., Bhawani, S.A. and Umar, K. 2021. Various natural and anthropogenic factors responsible for water quality degradation: A review. Water 13(19): 2660. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192660

Bekele-Tesemma, A. and Tengnäs, B. 2007. Useful trees and shrubs of Ethiopia: identification, propagation, and management for 17 agroclimatic zones (p. 552). Nirobi: RELMA in ICRAF Project, World Agroforestry Centre, Eastern Africa Region. https://blog.trytreats. com/useful-trees-and-shrubs-of-ethiopia-identification-propagation-and_YjozMDo2.pdf

Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27(4): 326-349. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1942268

Clarke, K.R., Somerfield, P.J. and Chapman, M.G. 2006. On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330(1): 55-80. https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S002209810500599X

Dagar, J.C. and Tewari, V.P. 2017. Agroforestry. Singapore: Springer Singapore. doi, 10, 978-981. https://link.springer.com/ content/pdf/10.1007/978-981-10-7650-3.pdf

Dufrene, M. and Legendre, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345-366. https://doi. org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067[0345:SAAIST]2 .0.CO;2

Endale, Y., Derero, A., Argaw, M., and Muthuri, C. (2017). Farmland tree species diversity and spatial distribution pattern in semi-arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. Forests, trees and LiveLihoods, 26(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472802 8.2016.1266971

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2012. Coping with water scarcity: An action framework for agriculture and food security. FAO Water Reports, No. 38. Rome. https://www.fao.org/policy-support/tools-and-publications/resources-details/en/c/1395516/

Hammer, O. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis palaeontologia electronica. http://palaeo-electronicaorg/2001_1/past/issue1_01htm Accessed, 1.

Hill, M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2): 427-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934352

IPCC 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T.; Tanabe, K., Eds.; Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme; IGES: Hayama, Japan, 2006 https:// www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/20880391

Jose, S. and Bardhan, S. 2012. Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: an overview. Agroforestry Systems 86: 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9573-x

Kavitha, A., Deepthi, N., Ganesan, R. and Joseph, G.J. 2012. Common dryland trees of Karnataka: bilingual field guide. Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Bangalore. https:// archived.atree.org/content/common-dryland-trees-karnataka-bilingual-field-guide

Kindt, R., Van Damme, P. and Simons, A.J. 2006. Tree diversity in western Kenya: using profiles to characterise richness and evenness. Forest Diversity and Management, 193-210. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_11

Krishnakanth, B.N. and Nagaraja, B.C. 2020. Agroforestry as an adaptation to climate variability in semi-arid regions of Karnataka, India. Annals of Arid Zone 59(1&2): 29-36. https:// epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAZ/article/ view/103049

Kisiangani, R. 2015. An analysis of land use potential in arid and semi-arid areas: Central location, isiolo county (Doctoral dissertation). http://hdl. handle.net/11295/95038

Kumar, V. 2015. Importance of homegardens agroforestry system in tropics region. Biodiversity, Conservation and Sustainable Development (Issues and Approaches), 2: 978-8186772751. https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/287996797_ Importance_of_Homegardens_Agroforestry_ System_in_Tropics_Region

Lehman, R.M., Cambardella, C.A., Stott, D.E., Acosta-Martinez, V., Manter, D.K., Buyer, J.S. and Karlen, D.L. 2015. Understanding and enhancing soil biological health: the solution for reversing soil degradation. Sustainability 7(1): 988-1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010988

Lu, Y., Song, S., Wang, R., Liu, Z., Meng, J., Sweetman, A. J. and Wang, T. 2015. Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environment International 77: 5-15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0160412015000021

MacDicken, K.G. 1997. A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects; Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cp-Rahangdale/post/What-are-the-different-methods-for-estimating-biomass-density-of-forest-ecosystem/attachment/5a9b73784cde266d588f09b6/AS%3A600312578584576%401520137080386/ download/Winrock+International+ %E7%A2%B3%E7%9B%91%E6%B5%8B%E6%8C%87%E5% 8D%97.pdf

McElwee, P. and Nghi, T.H. 2021. Assessing the social benefits of tree planting by smallholders in Vietnam: lessons for large-scale reforestation programs. Ecological Restoration 39(1-2): 52-63. http://er.uwpress.org/

Mercer, D.E., Frey, G.E. and Cubbage, F.W. 2014. Economics of agroforestry. Handbook of Forest Resource economics, 188-209. https://www.fs.usda. gov/research/treesearch/download/48058.pdf

Mishra, S. et al. 2019. Heavy metal contamination: An alarming threat to environment and human health. In: Environmental Biotechnology: For Sustainable Future (Eds. R. Sobti, N. Arora and R. Kothari), 103-125. Springer, Singapore. https://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-7284-0_5 (Full editors name pl.)

Mukhopadhyay, P. 2008. Theory and methods of survey sampling. India: PHI Learning. h t t p s : //w w w . p h i n d i a . c o m /B o o k s / BookDetail/9788120336766/theory-and-methods-of-survey-sampling-mukhopadhyay

Nair, P.K.R. 2012. Climate change mitigation: A low-hanging fruit of agroforestry. Sustainable Science 7(1): 109-111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94- 007-4676-3_7

Pande, V.C. 2021. Farm-forestry, smallholder farms and policy support–the way ahead. In Agroforestry-Small Landholder’s Tool for Climate Change Resiliency and Mitigation. London, UK: IntechOpen. https://www. intechopen.com/chapters/75916

Pielou, E. C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of theoretical biology, 13 (1), 131-144. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0

Ramachandra, T.V. and Mujumdar, P.P. 2009. Urban floods: Case study of Bangalore. Disaster and Development, Journal of the National Institute of Disaster Management 3(2):1-98 https://www. researchgate.net/publication/285321898_ Urban_floods_case_study_of_Bangalore_ disaster_development

Rodrigues, C.I.D., Brito, L.M. and Nunes, L.J. 2023. Soil carbon sequestration in the context of climate change mitigation: A review. Soil Systems 7(3): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7030064

Saha, J.K., Selladurai, R., Coumar, M.V., Dotaniya, M.L., Kundu, S., Patra, A. K. and Patra, A. K. 2017. Major inorganic pollutants affecting soil and crop quality. Soil Pollution-an Emerging Threat to Agriculture 75-104. https://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-4274-4_4

Seth, S.M. 2003. Human impacts and management issues in arid and semi-arid regions. International Contributions to Hydrogeology 23(1): 289-341. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/ edit/10.1201/9780203971307-13/human-impacts-management-issues-arid-semi-arid-regions-arid-semi-arid-regions-%E2%80%94s-seth

Shannon, C.E. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423. https://doi. org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

Sharma, R.; Pradhan, L.; Kumari, M.; Bhattacharya, P. 2021. Assessment of Carbon Sequestration Potential of Tree Species in Amity University Campus Noida. Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3(1): 52. doi:10.3390/IECF2020-08075

Simpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. doi:10.1038/163688a0

Saldanha, C.J. 1984. Flora of Karnataka. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, Vol. 1, 316 pp. https://wgbis.ces.iisc.ac.in/biodiversity/ sahyadri_enews/newsletter/issue41/article1/ herbarium.pdf

Suryavanshi, M.N., Patel, A.R., Kale, T.S. and Patil, P.R. 2014. Carbon Sequestration Potential of tree Species in the Environment of North Maharashtra University Campus, Jalgaon (MS) India. Bioscience Discovery 5: 175-179. https://citeseerx.ist.psu. edu/document?repid=rep1andtype=pdfanddoi= c93d36ae24728140c6976662dfd453590b1eac07

Umrani, R. 2010. Agroforestry systems and practices. https://library.uniteddiversity.coop/ Permaculture/Agroforestry/Agroforestry_ systems_and_practices.pdf

Downloads

Submitted

22-04-2024

Published

25-12-2024

How to Cite

Poornima M, & B.C. Nagaraja. (2024). Agroforestry Dynamics Among Different Landholding Farmers in Vrishabhavathi Basin, Karnataka. Annals of Arid Zone, 63(4), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v63i4.150816