Assessment of the reproductive status of wild boar from hormonal estimation of faecal samples

Nisha Vashishat; Tejdeep Kaur  Kler; Manoj Kumar

doi:10.56093/aaz.v64i2.152945

Authors

Nisha Vashishat Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Tejdeep Kaur Kler Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana
Manoj Kumar Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana

https://doi.org/10.56093/aaz.v64i2.152945

Keywords:

Wild boar (Sus scrofa), reproductive dynamics, hormonal estimation, management strategies

Abstract

Wild boar (Sus scrofa) population has increased constantly over the last three decades resulting into conflicts with the agro ecosystem. Damage to agricultural crops by wild boar is enormous and widespread. Therefore, understanding reproduction dynamics is necessary to control the local population successfully, which is of significant interest. One tool for evaluating reproductive functions in a wild population is to assess endocrine activity through hormone measurements in either blood, faeces, saliva, or other biological material. Endocrine analyses of steroid hormones enable us to evaluate reproductive status of animals; however, there is not much information available about sex hormone concentrations for the wild boar. The study involved a preliminary survey across different habitats during 2022-23 to estimate population of wild boar and variability in their reproductive hormone levels. Presence of wild boar was observed at village Ladhowal, Baranhara, Majarakalan, Rajjapur, Bhollewal, Dhanasu, Noorpur bet and Kharak of Ludhiana district of Punjab. Average herd size ranges from 5-9 individuals along the river Sutlej catchment areas where wild boars have ample habitat to roost in the day time and venture out during the night for feeding activities causing damage to agricultural crops. With the aim to study wild boar population with respect to their gender, faecal samples were collected from different habitats to analyse the reproductive hormones of wild boar. Results revealed distinct hormonal patterns corresponding to occurrence of male and female wild boars showing higher level of testosterone and progesterone during the months from July to December indicating more breeding activities as compared to from January to June. Non-invasive hormonal estimation of faecal samples may prove to be a valuable tool for monitoring the reproductive status of wild boar populations, offering a cost-effective and ethically sound alternative to traditional invasive methods. This approach, if thoroughly studied, could help in future wildlife management by guiding conservation efforts and population control tailored to wild boar reproductive dynamics across environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alpizar-Jara, R. 2006. Advanced Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations Edited by Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. and Thomas, L., Biometrics 62(3): 940–941

Augustsson, E., Kim, H., Andrén, H., Graf, L., Kjellander, P., Widgren, S., Månsson, J., Malmsten, J. and Thurfjell, H. 2024. Density-dependent dinner: Wild boar overuse agricultural land at high densities. European Journal of Wildlife Research 70: 15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01766-7

Balasundaram, R., Sivaraj, K. and Samson, A. 2018. Abundance survey and crop damage incidences of Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Nilgiri South Forest Division, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu. Technical Report Pp 57.

Barrios-Garcia, M.N. and Ballari, S. A. 2012. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14(11): 228–300.

Cappa, F., Bani, L. And Meriggi, A. 2021. Factors affecting the crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) and effects of population control in the Ticino and Lake Maggiore Park (North-western Italy). Mammalian Biology 101: 451-463

Cuevas, M.F., Ojeda, R.A. and Jaksic, F.M. 2016. Ecological strategies and impact of wild boar in phytogeographic provinces of Argentina with emphasis on aridlands. Mastozoología Neotropical 23(2): 239-254.

Davidson, A., Malkinson, D., Schonblum, A., Koren, L., Shanas, U. 2021. Do boars compensate for hunting with higher reproductive hormones? Conservation Physiology 9(1): coab068. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coab068.

Erdtmann, D. and Keuling, O. 2020. Behavioural patterns of free roaming wild boar in a spatiotemporal context. Peer Journal 8:e10409. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10409

Glennie, R., Buckland, S. T., Langrock, R., Gerrodette, T., Ballance, L. T., Chivers, S. J. and Scott, M. D. 2020. Incorporating animal movement into distance sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(533): 107–115.

Irizar, I., Laskurain, N.A. and Herrero, J. 2004. Wild boar frugivory in the Atlantic Basque Country. Galemys 16: 125–133.

Johann, F., Handschuh, M., Linderoth, P., Dormann, C.F. and Arnold, J. 2020. Adaptation of wild boar (Sus scrofa) activity in a human-dominated landscape. BMC Ecology 20: 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12898-019-0271-7

Keuling, O., Stier, N. and Roth, M. 2009. Commuting, shifting or remaining? Different spatial utilisation patterns of wild boar Sus scrofa L. in forest and field crops during summer. Mammalian Biology 74: 145-152.

Khan, S. and Ilyas, O. 2018. Status distribution and feeding habit of Wild Boar Sus scrofa (Mammalia: Artiodactyla: Suidae) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(11): 12459–12463.

Kim, Y., Cho, S. and Choung, Y. 2019. Habitat preference of wild boar (Sus scrofa) for feeding in cool-temperate forests. Journal of Ecology and Environment 43: 30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-019-0126-3

Kovács, V., Újváry, D. and Szemethy, L. 2017. Availability of camera trapping for behavioural analysis: an example with wild boar (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 195: 112–114.

Kusuda, S., Adachi, I., Fujioka, K., Nakamura, M., Amano-Hanzawa, N., Goto, N. and Doi, O. 2013. Reproductive characteristics of female lesser mouse deers (Tragulus javanicus) based on fecal progestagens and breeding records. Animal Reproduction Science 137: 69-73.

Maselli, V., Rippa, D., Russo, G., Ligrone, R., Soppelsa, O., D’Aniello, B., Raia, P. and Fulgione, D. 2014. Wild boars’ social structure in the Mediterranean habitat. Italian Journal of Zoology 81:610–617.

Miettinen, E., Melin, M., Holmala, K., Meller, A., Vaananen, V.M., Huitu, O. and Kunnasranta, M. 2023. Home ranges and movement patterns of wild boars (Sus scrofa) at the northern edge of the species’ distribution range. Mammalian Biology 68: 611-623.

Muehlenbein M P, Watts D P (2010) The costs of dominance: testosterone, cortisol and intestinal parasites in wild male chimpanzees. Biopsychosocial Medicine 4: 21. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-4-21.

Muthoka, C.M., Andrén, H., Nyaga, J., Augustsson, E. and Kjellander, P. 2022. Effect of supplemental feeding on habitat and crop selection by wild boar in Sweden. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 35: 106–124.

Rao, V.V., Naresh, B., Reddy, R.R., Sudhrkar, C., Venkateswarlu, P. and Rao, R.D. 2015. Traditional management methods used to minimize Indian wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus) damage in different agricultural crops at Telangana state, India. Human Wildlife Conflict 5: 200-215.

Schwarzenberger, F. and Brown, J.L. 2013. Hormone monitoring: An important tool for the breeding management of wildlife species. Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift 100: 209-225.

Serrani, A., Rossi, C. and Primi. 2012. Increase in crop damage caused by wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): the “refuge effect”. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32(3): 683-692.

Singh, R. And Kumar, M. 2018. Preliminary observations on the Indian wild boar (Sus scrofa) and ITS damage in agricultural crop fields. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 6(3): 743-747.

Sparklin, W.D. 2009. Territoriality and habitat selection of feral pigs on Fort Benning, Georgia, USA. M.Sc Thesis, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana 22-25.

Wang, C., Zeng, B., Song, X., Luo, D. and Lin, T. 2023. Impacts of wild boars on local livelihoods in rural communities: A case study of mountainous areas in southeast China. Frontiers in Environmental Science 11: 1048808. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1048808

Yadav, N., Mishra, M.K. and Saran, V. 2020. Characterization of Pugmark for Animal Species Identification for Forensic Importance. Journal of Forensic Science & Criminology 8(1): 1-10.

Yoshida, T., Shimokawa, Y., Ohta, M., Takayanagi, M. and Kusuda, S. 2024. Reproductive Seasonality, Estrous Cycle, Pregnancy, and the Recurrence of Postpartum Estrus Based on Long-Term Profiles of Fecal Sex Steroid Hormone Metabolites regarding Zoo-Housed Female Golden Takins (Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi). Animals 14(4): 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040571