Zoning Desertification Risks by using ICD and MICD models in Niatak Region of Sistan, Iran


Abstract views: 144 / PDF downloads: 49

Authors

  • S M Hosseini Islamic Azad University, Arsenjan, Iran
  • M Feyzolahpour University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
  • S Sadrafshari University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
  • M Hashemi Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Desertification phenomenon threatens a considerable portion of the world and
is developing rapidly. This has occurred more acutely in Iran. Thus, in this research,
the current conditions, type and intensity of factors influencing desertification of Niatak
Region of Sistan were investigated by using Iranian Classification of Desertification
(ICD) and Modified Iranian Classification of Desertification (MICD). In ICD model,
scores were given to the six influential factors in desertification of each working unit.
Based on the results obtained from ICD model, the study area was divided into three
classes (medium, high and very high) according to their desertification intensities. The
medium, high, and very high classes were about 2857.42, 1503.17 and 459.1 hectares,
respectively. However, based on the results obtained from MICD model, the medium,
high and very high classes desertification covers an area of about 1974.84 hectares (41%),
2385.71 hectares (49.5%) and 459.1 hectares 9.5% of the entire region, respectively.
Key words: Desertification, wind erosion, scoring, ICD, MICD, Niatak of Sistan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadi, H., Ekhtesasi, M.R. and Hemmati, N. 2007.

Estimation and comparison of water and wind

erosion sedimentation potential by MPSIAC and

IRIFR.E. A model in semi-arid regions (Case

study: Nematabad watershed in Bijar). Iranian

Journal of Natural Resources 60(4): 1-11.

Brunner, A.C., Park, S.J., Ruecker, G.R. and Vlek,

P.L.G. 2008. Erosion modeling approach to

simulation the effect of land management

options on soil loss by considering catenary soil

development and farmers precipitation. Land

Degradation and Development 19: 623-635.

Chamanpira, G.R., Javadi, M.R., Ahmadi, H.

and Azarnivand, H. 2006. The application

of ICD method for appointment of current

desertification condition in water Kohdasht

basin, Iran. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources

(3): 543-555.

Ekhtesasi, M.R. and Mohajeri, S. 1995. Classification

method and type of desertification intensity

for lands in Iran. Supervising Engineers in Iran

Society: Sharing Solutions. The 2nd National

of Desertification and Control Desertification

Conference, Kerman University, Iran.14.

Fozuni, L. 2007. Evaluation of current desertification

condition of Sistan, Iran, by modified MEDALUS

model stressing on water and wind erosion,

M.Sc. Thesis of Zabol University, 137 p.

Ghasemi S. 2006. Assessment of desertification in

Sustain plain considering the soil and water

indicators. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Tehran.

God, A. and Lotfy, I. 2008. Use of remote sensing and

GIS in mapping the environmental sensitivity

areas for desertification of Egyptian territory.

eEarth Discussion 3: 41-85. (eEarth)

Goia, A.N. 2001. Investigating the effective factors

of desertification in the Hussein Abad Mir Mast

plain of Qom and presentation of a regional

model. Tehran University, 132.

Hosseini, S.M. 2008. Classification of desertification

intensity in Niatak–Sistan region, Iran, by ICD

model. Zabol University, 127.

Kosmas, C., Ferrara, A. and Briasouli, H. 1999.

Methodology for mapping Environmentally

Sensitive Areas (ESAs) to desertification. In The

MEDALUS Project Mediterranean Desertification

and Land Use (Eds. C. Kosmas, M. Kirkby

and N. Geeson). Manual on Key Indicators of

Dsertification and mapping environmentally

sensitive areas to desertification. European

Union 18882: 31-47.

Ladisa, G., Todofvica, M. and Trisorio-Liuzzi, G.

Characterization of area sensitive to

desertification in southern Italy. Proceedings of

the 2nd Conference on New Trend in Water and

Environmental Engineering for Safety and Life. Ecocompatible

Solution for Aquatic Environmental,

Capri, Italy, 2–14.

Lavado, C.J.F., Schnabel, S., Mezo, Gutierrez, A.G.

and Pulido, F.M. 2009. Mapping sensitivity to

land degradation Extremadura. SW spain. Land

Degradation and Development 20: 129-144.

Li, X.Y., Ma, Y.J., Xu, H.Y., Wang, J.H. and Zhang,

D.S. 2009. Impact of land use and land cover

change on environment degradation in lake

Qinghai watershed, northeast Qinghaitibet

plateau. Land Degradation and Development 20:

-83.

Risser, P.G. 1984. Method for Inventory and Monitoring

Vegetation Litter and Soil Surface Condition.

Development strategies for range land

management. West view press, Bolder Colorado.

Singh, G. 2009. Salinity related desertification and

management strategies INDIAN experience.

Land Degradation and Development 20: 367-385.

UNEP 2002. Sistan Oasis Parched by Drought.

Complied by UNEP/DEWP/GRID-Geneva, July

-21.

Zehtabian, G.R., Amiraslani, F. and Khosravi, H. 2006.

The reapplication of MEDALUS methodology in

Kashan desertified region, Iran. 14th International

Soil Conservation Organization Conference.

Water Management and Soil Conservation in

Semi-arid Environments. Marrakech, Morocco,

May 14–19, 2006 (ISCO 2006).

Zhu, D., Wang, T.W., Cai, C.F., Li, L. and Shi, Z.H.

Large-scale assessment of soil erosion

using a neuro-fuzzy model combined with GIS:

A case study of Hubei Province, China. Land

Degradation and Development 20: 654-666.

Downloads

Submitted

27-12-2018

Published

04-04-2019

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hosseini, S. M., Feyzolahpour, M., Sadrafshari, S., & Hashemi, M. (2019). Zoning Desertification Risks by using ICD and MICD models in Niatak Region of Sistan, Iran. Annals of Arid Zone, 57(3 & 4). https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/AAZ/article/view/85759