Evaluation of Byproducts of Some Minor Millets for Chemical Composition,Mineral Profile and In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics


18 / 3

Authors

  • T.V.Girisha
  • V .Nagabhushana Veterinary College, KVAFSU, Shivamogga (Karnataka)-577204
  • T. Thirumalesh
  • K.S. Giridhar
  • A.M.Kotresh
  • R. Jayashree
  • N.B.Shridhar
  • K.C.Veeranna

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijan.v42i2.

Keywords:

Minor millet byproducts, digestibility, in vitro

Abstract

An in vitro evaluation of byproduct of selected minor millets by gas production technique followed by an in vivo evaluation of Browntop millet (Brachiariaramosa) byproduct based CFM by twelve-week feeding and metabolism trial in sheep was conducted. In vitro study revealed that ME(MJ/kg) and IVDOM(%) of Browntop (6.81 and 53.95) and Littlemillet (6.81 and 53.09) byproduct were similar whereas lower values were found in Foxtail(5.04 and 41.70), Kodomillet (5.00 and 40.26), Prosomillet (5.23 and 43.47) and poor in Barnyard (2.90 and 30.79). In vitro gas production kinetics study revealed that readily soluble fraction ‘a’ value was not detectable whereas, insoluble but fermentable fraction “b” was significantly (P<0.01) highest (34.87) in BTMBP and lowest (7.98) in BYMBP. Eighteen rams, aged 12 months (average bodyweight 26.25 kg) of non-descriptive breed were randomly allotted to three dietary treatment groups fed maize top hay based diet with wheat bran (T1) and replaced 50% (T2) and 100% (T3) wheat bran with BTMBP.The inclusion of BTMBP in either diets showed no significant difference (P>0.05) in mean DMI(83.78;82.99) as compared to T1(86.31g/kg W0.75). Intake of nutrients, except EE, were comparable. Digestibility of DM,CP,CF,NFE,NDF,ADF,C and HC was similar However, digestibility of OM and EE (P<0.05) was found high in T1 as compared to T2 and T3. Intake of TDN, DCP and ME were not influenced by the inclusion of BTMBP. The ADG (g/d) in T1(101.19), T2(91.86) and T3(88.39) were also comparable (P>0.05).It is concluded BTMBP and LTMBP were found to be nutritionally better than FXMBP,KDMBP,PSMBP. BYMBP was nutritionally poor.

References

A.O.A.C. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Official methods of analysis, 2016. 20th Edn., Washington, D.C

Akinfemi, A. and Ayoade, J. 2017. Use of in vitro gas production technique in the evaluation of fungal treated maize husk. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 1: 77-84

Arulnathan, N., Murugan, M. and Balakrishnan, V. 2013. Proximateprinciples, fibre fraction and mineral content of black gram husk (Vigna mungo). Int. J. Livestock Res. 3(3): 24-30

Bledzki, A. K., Mamun, A. A. and Jürgen V. 2010. Physical, chemical and surface properties of wheat husk, rye husk and soft wood and their polypropylene composites. J. Composites. 41: 480-488

Blummel. M. A. S. 1994. Relationship between kinetics of stover fermentation as described by the Hohenheim in vitro gas production test and voluntary feed intake of 54 cereal stovers. Dissertation. Hohenheim University, Germany.

Buerkert, A., Moser, M., Kumar, A. K., Fürst, P. and Becker, K. 2001.Variation in grain quality of pearl millet from Sahelian West Africa. Field Crops Res. 69: 1-11

Dineshkumar, Datt, C., Das, L. K and Kundu, S.S., 2015. Evaluation of various feedstuffs of ruminants in terms of chemical composition and metabolisable energy content. Vet. World. 8(5): 605-609

Fidriyanto, R., Ridwan, R., Astuti, W. D., Rohmatussolihat, Sari,N. F., Watman, M and Widyastuti, Y. 2020. In vitro ruminal fermentation and degradability of rice husk on rice bran substitution. Annales Bogorienses. 24(1): 50-58

Gaur, A and Taparia, A. L. 1991. Comparative utilization of sorghum ear husk by cattle, sheep and goats. Indian J. Anim. Nutri. 8(1): 15-18

Heuze, V. and Tran. G., 2015. Finger millet (Eleusine coracana), grain. Feedipedia, a progragrmme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. https:// www.feedipedia.org/ node/ 72 (16 Jan 2021, date last accessed)

Heuze, V.,Tran, G., Baumont, R., Noblet, J.,Renaudeau, D., Lessire,M. and Lebas, F., 2015. Wheat bran. https://www.feedipedia.org/node/726 (16 Jan 2021, date last accessed)

ICAR-AICRP, 2018. Annual Progress Report: 2017-2018, ICAR-AICRP on small millets, Bengaluru.

Kadirvel, R., Bhaskaran, M., Mohan, B And Natarajan, A.1994. The value of fox tail millet (Setaria italica) bran in broiler diets. Tropical Agri.,71(4): 330-332

Krishnamoorthy, U., Solled, H., Steingass, H and Menke, K. H.1995. Energy and protein evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for whole tract and ruminal digestion by chemical analyses and rumen inoculum studies in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci.Tech. 52: 177-188

Menke, K. H. and Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Developement. 28: 7-55

Mopate, L. Y., Kabore, C. Y and Facho, B. 2011. Availability and nutritive value of rice bran, maize bran and sorghum bran used for pig feeding in N’Djamena (Chad). J. Appl. Bio sci., 41: 2757-2764

Nagaraju, 2017. Evaluation of different dehulling machines for efficient processing of Brown top millet and storage studies of milled rice. M.Sc thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.

Okoruwa, M. I., Igene, F. U and Isika, M. A. 2012. Replacement value of cassava peels with rice husk for guinea grass in the diet of West African Dwarf (WAD) sheep. Canadian J. Agri Sci.4: 254-261

Rosa, S. M., Santos, L., Ferreira, C. A., and Nachgell, S. M. B. 2009. Studies on the properties of rice husk filled PP composites - Effect of maleate PP. mat. Res,. 12(3): 333-338

Tran, G., 2015. Millet hulls. https://feedipedia.org/node/15695 (Date last accessed 11 may 2020)

Vansoest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A., 1991. Methods of dietary

fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597

Vijayan, R., 2016. Dry land agriculture in India – problems and solutions. Asian J. Environ. Sci., 11(2): 171-177

Downloads

Submitted

22-12-2023

Published

15-09-2025

Issue

Section

Short Communication

How to Cite

T.V.Girisha, V .Nagabhushana, T. Thirumalesh, K.S. Giridhar, A.M.Kotresh, R. Jayashree, N.B.Shridhar, & K.C.Veeranna. (2025). Evaluation of Byproducts of Some Minor Millets for Chemical Composition,Mineral Profile and In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.56093/ijan.v42i2.