Application of Health Assessment Index for assessing the ecological health of River Mahanadi
483 / 0
Authors
-
Sanjay Bhowmick
-
Sajina A M
-
Srikanta Samanta
-
Samir Kumar Paul
-
Deepa Sudheesan
-
Subir Kumar Nag
-
Vikash Kumar
-
Raju Baitha
Abstract
Biotic communities are sensitive to environmental factors and offer an integral perspective of the environmental conditions of a given habitat. Fishare widely used as sentinel species to assess environmental health and are excellent indicators of overall health of rivers. A study was carried out to
evaluate and compare the environmental quality of different stretches of River Mahanadi by analyzing fish health using Health Assessment Index (HAI). The HAI values of individual fishes varied from 0 to 200. The fish which got the highest score for HAI was from the winter sample of Sonepur. The lowest score for HAI was recorded at Tikarpara, a site which falls under protected Satkosia river sanctuary. The most common groups of parasites recorded were myxozoans, trichodinids, copepods and monogenetic trematodes. Parasite
numbers recorded from Cirrhinus reba supported the HAI hypothesis that higher endoparasite and lower ectoparasite numbers occur at highly impacted areas.
The present study suggests that HAI can be used as an effective biological monitoring tool for Indian rivers.
Key words Ecological health, Biomonitoring, Parasite
References
1. Abram, Q. H., Dixon, B. and Katzenback, B. A. 2017. Impacts
2. of low temperature on the teleost immune system.
3. Biology (Basel), 6(4): 39. doi: 10.3390/biology6040039.
4. Adams, S. M., Brown, A. M. and Goede, R. W. 1993. A
5. quantitative health assessment index for rapid
6. evaluation of fish condition in the field. Transactions
7. of the American Fisheries Society, 122(1): 63-73.
8. Cheung, W. W. L., Pitcher T. J. and Pauly, D. 2005. A fuzzy
9. logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction
10. vulnerabilities of marine fishes to fishing. Biological
11. Conservation, 124: 97-111.
12. Crafford, D. and Avenant-Oldewage, A. 2009. Application of a
13. fish health assessment index and associated parasite
14. index to Clarias gariepinus (Teleostei: Clariidae) in the
15. Vaal River system, South Africa. African Journal of
16. Aquatic Science 34(3): 261-272.
17. Goede, R. W. and Barton, B. A. 1990. Organismic indices and an
18. autopsy based assessment as indicators of health and
19. condition of fish. American Fisheries Society
20. Symposium, 8: 93-108.
21. Harris, J. H. 2006. The use of fish in ecological assessment.
22. Austral Ecology, 20(1): 65-80
23. Karr, J. R. 1999. Defining and measuring river health.
24. Freshwater Biology, 41: 221-234.
25. Madanire-Moyo, G. N. 2011. A comparative evaluation of
26. ecosystem health of selected water bodies in the Olifants
27. and Limpopo River systems using the health
28. assessment index and parasite diversity as indicators.
29. PhD Thesis. University of Limpopo, South Africa.
30. Parida, P. K., Behera, B. K., Sahu, S. K., Mohanty, B. P. and
31. Das, B. K. 2018. A road map for inland fisheries
32. development in the state of Odisha, India. Journal of
33. the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 50(1): 53-59.
34. Ramakrishnaiah, C. R., Sadashivaiah, C., and Ranganna, G. 2009.
35. Assessment of water quality index for the groundwater
36. in Tumkur Taluk, Karnataka State, India. E-Journal of
37. chemistry, 6(2): 523-530.
38. Sedeño-DÃaz, J. E. and López-López, E. 2012. Freshwater fish
39. as sentinel organisms: from the molecular to the
40. population level, a review. In: New advances and
41. Contributions to Fish Biology, IntechOpen, chapter 4.
42. pp. 151-173. DOI: 10.5772/54825.
43. Simon, T. P. and Lyons, J. 1995. Application of the index of
44. biotic integrity to evaluate water resource integrity in
45. freshwater ecosystems. In: Davis, W.S. & T.P. Simon
46. (eds) Biological assessment and criteria. Tools for water resource planning and decision making. Boca Raton,
47. Florida: Lewis Press: pp. 245-262.
48. Van der Oost, R., Beyer, J. and Vermeulen, N. P. E. 2003. Fish
49. bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk
50. assessment: a review. Environmental Toxicology and
51. Pharmacology, 13: 57-149.
52. Watson, R. M., Crafford, D. and Avenant-Oldewage, A. 2012.
53. Evaluation of the fish health assessment index in the
54. Olifants River system, South Africa. African Journal of
55. Aquatic Science, 37(3): 235-251.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In case of publication of the article in the journal, author(s) are required to assign copyright to the Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India for its publication in any form/language including all media (print and electronic, or presently unknown), and exclusive right to use the matter for the life of the work (no time restriction on re use of matter).