Economic value of ecosystem services of Gosaba estuarine ecosystem of Sundarbans
509 / 0
Abstract
Inland open waters like any other natural resources are complex, multi-functional, and provide a number of ecosystem services contributing to human welfare. However, we often underestimate their values since we get most of the services for free. Therefore, economic valuation could be a powerful tool for realizing the actual values of these precious natural resources and thereby contributing to shaping the policies governing their conservation and sustainable utilization. The present study attempted to value some of the ecosystem services of Gosaba Island which is an estuarine ecosystem situated in Indian Sundarbans. For the study, primary and secondary data were collected from the different stakeholders. Out of the several ecosystem services in the selected ecosystem, seven services viz, fisheries, eco-tourism, agriculture, nontimber forest produce (NTFP), dike protection function of mangroves, carbon stored and option use value (through WTP) were considered for the valuation exercises. Different valuation techniques like market price, revenue generation, Travel Cost Method, Contingent Valuation were applied. It was estimated that
the minimum value of the six goods and services were Rs.69,527 lakh per annum, among them carbon store value, eco-tourism, dike protection function of mangroves. In addition, the option use value was estimated to be Rs. 5.82 lakh. Fisheries, agriculture were the major components. The study is important in understanding the value of the ecosystem services which may help in their conservation.
Key words Valuation; Estuary; Sundarbans
References
1. Adger, W. N., Kelly, P. M. and Tri, N. H. 2001. Costs and
2. benefits of mangrove conversion and restoration.
3. In: Economics of coastal and water resources: Valuing
4. environmental functions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp.
5. -279.
6. Carr L. and Mendelsohn R. 2003. Valuing coral reefs: A travel
7. cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio. 32(5):
8. -357.
9. Ekka, A and Pandit, A. 2012. Willingness to pay for restoration
10. of natural ecosystem: A study of Sundarban mangroves
11. by contingent valuation approach. Indian Journal of
12. Agricultural Economics, 67(3): 323-333.
13. Font A. R. 2000. Mass tourism and the demand for protected
14. natural areas: A travel cost approach. Journal of
15. Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1):
16. -116.
17. Forslund, A. 2009. Securing water for ecosystems and human
18. well-being: The importance of environmental flows.
19. Swedish Water House Report 24. SIWI, 52p.
20. Freeman, A. Myrick. 2003. The measurement of
21. environmental and resource values: Theory and
22. methods. Resources for the Future, Washington D.C, 2nd
23. Edition, 2003.
24. Herath G. and Kennedy J. 2004. Estimating the economic value
25. of Mount Buffalo National Park with the travel cost
26. and contingent valuation models. Tourism Economics,
27. (1): 63-78(16).
28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and
29. human well-being: wetlands and water Synthesis. World
30. Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 69p.
31. Mitra, A., Sengupta, K. and Banerjee, K. 2011. Standing
32. biomass and carbon storage of above-ground structures
33. in dominant mangrove trees in the Sundarbans. Forest
34. Ecology and Management, 261 (7): 1325-1335.
35. Pandit Arun, Ekka, A., Sharma, A. P., Bhattacharjya, B. K.,
36. Katiha P. K. and Biswas, D. K. 2015. Economic
37. valuation of natural ecosystems – an empirical study of
38. a stretch of Bramhaputra river. Indian Journal of
39. Fisheries, 62(3): 107-112.
40. Pendleton, L. and Mendelsohn, R. 2000. Estimating recreation
41. preferences using hedonic travel cost and random
42. utility models. Environmental and Resource
43. Economics, 17(1): 89-108.
44. Roggeri H. 1995. Tropical fresh water wetlands - A guide to
45. current knowledge and sustainable management -
46. Appendix D.5 - Potential wetland benefits: Existence
47. indicators. ISBN: 978-90-481-4635-2 (Print)
48. -94-015-8398-5 (Online).
49. Vinh, T. T. 1995. Tree planting measures to protect sea dike
50. systems in the Central Provinces of Vietnam.
51. In: Workshop on Mangrove Plantation for Sea Dyke
52. Protection, Hatinh, Vietnam (Vol. 2425).
53. Wang G., Fang Q., Zhang L., Chen W., Chen Z. and Hong H.
54. Valuing the effects of hydropower development
55. on watershed ecosystem services: Case studies in the
56. Jiulong River watershed, Fujian Province, China.
57. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 86: 363-368.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In case of publication of the article in the journal, author(s) are required to assign copyright to the Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India for its publication in any form/language including all media (print and electronic, or presently unknown), and exclusive right to use the matter for the life of the work (no time restriction on re use of matter).