Economic value of ecosystem services of Gosaba estuarine ecosystem of Sundarbans


509 / 0

Authors

  • Anjana Ekka
  • Arun Pandit
  • P. K. Katiha
  • D K Biswas

https://doi.org/10.56093/jifsi.52.2.2020.109940

Abstract

Inland open waters like any other natural resources are complex, multi-functional, and provide a number of ecosystem services contributing to human welfare. However, we often underestimate their values since we get most of the services for free. Therefore, economic valuation could be a powerful tool for realizing the actual values of these precious natural resources and thereby contributing to shaping the policies governing their conservation and sustainable utilization. The present study attempted to value some of the ecosystem services of Gosaba Island which is an estuarine ecosystem situated in Indian Sundarbans. For the study, primary and secondary data were collected from the different stakeholders. Out of the several ecosystem services in the selected ecosystem, seven services viz, fisheries, eco-tourism, agriculture, nontimber forest produce (NTFP), dike protection function of mangroves, carbon stored and option use value (through WTP) were considered for the valuation exercises. Different valuation techniques like market price, revenue generation, Travel Cost Method, Contingent Valuation were applied. It was estimated that
the minimum value of the six goods and services were Rs.69,527 lakh per annum, among them carbon store value, eco-tourism, dike protection function of mangroves. In addition, the option use value was estimated to be Rs. 5.82 lakh. Fisheries, agriculture were the major components. The study is important in understanding the value of the ecosystem services which may help in their conservation.

Key words Valuation; Estuary; Sundarbans

References

1. Adger, W. N., Kelly, P. M. and Tri, N. H. 2001. Costs and

2. benefits of mangrove conversion and restoration.

3. In: Economics of coastal and water resources: Valuing

4. environmental functions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp.

5. -279.

6. Carr L. and Mendelsohn R. 2003. Valuing coral reefs: A travel

7. cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef. Ambio. 32(5):

8. -357.

9. Ekka, A and Pandit, A. 2012. Willingness to pay for restoration

10. of natural ecosystem: A study of Sundarban mangroves

11. by contingent valuation approach. Indian Journal of

12. Agricultural Economics, 67(3): 323-333.

13. Font A. R. 2000. Mass tourism and the demand for protected

14. natural areas: A travel cost approach. Journal of

15. Environmental Economics and Management, 39(1):

16. -116.

17. Forslund, A. 2009. Securing water for ecosystems and human

18. well-being: The importance of environmental flows.

19. Swedish Water House Report 24. SIWI, 52p.

20. Freeman, A. Myrick. 2003. The measurement of

21. environmental and resource values: Theory and

22. methods. Resources for the Future, Washington D.C, 2nd

23. Edition, 2003.

24. Herath G. and Kennedy J. 2004. Estimating the economic value

25. of Mount Buffalo National Park with the travel cost

26. and contingent valuation models. Tourism Economics,

27. (1): 63-78(16).

28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and

29. human well-being: wetlands and water Synthesis. World

30. Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 69p.

31. Mitra, A., Sengupta, K. and Banerjee, K. 2011. Standing

32. biomass and carbon storage of above-ground structures

33. in dominant mangrove trees in the Sundarbans. Forest

34. Ecology and Management, 261 (7): 1325-1335.

35. Pandit Arun, Ekka, A., Sharma, A. P., Bhattacharjya, B. K.,

36. Katiha P. K. and Biswas, D. K. 2015. Economic

37. valuation of natural ecosystems – an empirical study of

38. a stretch of Bramhaputra river. Indian Journal of

39. Fisheries, 62(3): 107-112.

40. Pendleton, L. and Mendelsohn, R. 2000. Estimating recreation

41. preferences using hedonic travel cost and random

42. utility models. Environmental and Resource

43. Economics, 17(1): 89-108.

44. Roggeri H. 1995. Tropical fresh water wetlands - A guide to

45. current knowledge and sustainable management -

46. Appendix D.5 - Potential wetland benefits: Existence

47. indicators. ISBN: 978-90-481-4635-2 (Print)

48. -94-015-8398-5 (Online).

49. Vinh, T. T. 1995. Tree planting measures to protect sea dike

50. systems in the Central Provinces of Vietnam.

51. In: Workshop on Mangrove Plantation for Sea Dyke

52. Protection, Hatinh, Vietnam (Vol. 2425).

53. Wang G., Fang Q., Zhang L., Chen W., Chen Z. and Hong H.

54. Valuing the effects of hydropower development

55. on watershed ecosystem services: Case studies in the

56. Jiulong River watershed, Fujian Province, China.

57. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 86: 363-368.

Published

2021-01-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ekka, A., Pandit, A., Katiha, P. K., & Biswas, D. K. (2021). Economic value of ecosystem services of Gosaba estuarine ecosystem of Sundarbans. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 52(2), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.56093/jifsi.52.2.2020.109940