ESTIMATION OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY IN FISHES FROM RIVER GANGA FOR RIVERINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH BIOMONITORING AND ASSESSMENT


229 / 0

Authors

  • BIMAL PRASANNA MOHANTY
  • SATABDI GANGULY
  • ARABINDA MAHANTY
  • TANDRIMA MITRA
  • PRASENJIT PARIA
  • BIJAY KUMAR BEHERA
  • BASANTA KUMAR DAS

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.49.1.2017.113785

Abstract

Concentration of pollutants in fish tissues is a true reflection of their concentration in the ecosystem. In this context, toxic environmental contaminants arsenic and mercury in fishes from river Ganga were investigated by inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to assess the level of these contaminants in different stretches of the river. Total arsenic concentrations in Tenualosa ilisha, Sperata seenghala, Amblypharyngodon mola and Puntius sophore were 0.02-2.9 mg kg-1 which is within the permissible limit for human consumption. Mean mercury content was below the permissible level (0.003-0.05 mg kg-1) in all fishes analyzed from different stretches. This biomonitoring study showed that river Ganga, in the indicated and adjoining stretches, appears to be free from arsenic and mercury contamination. This study demonstrated the dual benefits associated with using fish as biomonitors; it serves as a tool for riverine ecosystem health monitoring and also provides information on food safety.

Key words: Arsenic, ICP-MS, Fish biomonitors, Food safety, Mercury, Riverine ecosystem health biomonitoring

References

Agarwal RR, Kumar R, Behari JR (2007) Mercury and lead content in fish species from the river Gomti, Lucknow, India, as biomarkers of contamination. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 78:118-122

Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, Second Edition.

EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C

Bere T, Nyampuingidza BB (2013) Use of biological monitoring tools beyond their country of origin: a case study of South African scoring system version 5 (SAASS5). Hydrobiologia 722: 223-232

Bhattacharyya S, Chaudhuri P, Dutta S, Santra SC (2010) Assessment of total mercury level in fish collected from east Calcutta wetlands and Titagarh sewage fed aquaculture in West Bengal, India Bull Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 84:618-622

Chowdhury A, Samanta S, Manna SK, Sharma AP, Bandopadhyay C, Pramanik K, Sarkar S, Mohanty BP (2015) Arsenic in freshwater ecosystems of the Bengal delta: status, sources and seasonal

variability. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 97(5): 538-551

Djedjibegovic J, Larssen T, Skrbo A, Marjanovic A, Sober M (2012) Contents of cadmium, copper, mercury and lead in fish from the Neretva river (Bosnia and Herzegovina) determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Food Chem 131: 469-476

Falco G, Llobet JM, Bocio A, Domingo JL (2006) Daily intake of arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead by consumption of edible marine species. J Agri Food Chem 54:6106-6112

FAO/WHO. (2010). Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Report of the Seventy-Second Meeting of JECFA in the WHO Technical

Report Series, Rome Italy: 21-64

Guha-Mazumder DN (2008) Chronic arsenic toxicity and human health Indian J. Med. Res 128:436-447

Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ (1986). Assessing biological integrity in running waters: A method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication

Mahaffey KR(2005) Mercury exposure: medical and public health issues Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 116: 127-154.

Mohanty BP (2010) Fish as health food In: Ayyappan S, Moza U, Gopalakrishnan A, Meenakumari B, Jena JK, Pandey AK (eds), Handbook of fisheries and aquaculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi pp 843-861

Mohanty BP, Banerjee S, Sadhukhan P, Chaudhury AN, Goldar D, Bhattacharjee S, Bhowmick S, Manna SK, Samanta S (2015). Pathophysiological changes in rohu (Labeo rohita, Hamilton)

fingerlings following arsenic exposure Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., 38(4): 315 - 319

Mohanty BP, Paria P, Das D, Ganguly S, Mitra P, Verma A, Sahoo S, Mahanty A, Aftabuddin Md, Behera BK, Sankar TV, Sharma AP (2012a) Nutrient profile of giant river-catfish Sperata seenghala (Sykes).

Natl Acad Sci Lett, 35(3): 151-161

Mohanty BP, Paria P, Mahanty A, Behera BK, Mathew S, Sankar TV, Sharma AP (2012b) Fatty acid profile of Indian shad Tenualosa ilisha and its dietary significance Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett., 35(4): 263-269

Mohanty BP, Sankar TV, Ganguly S, Mahanty A, Anandan R, Chakrabarty K, Paul BN, Sarma D, Dayal JS, Mathew S, Asha KK, Mitra T, Karunakaran D, Chanda S, Sahi N, Das P, Das P, Akhtar MD, Vijayagopal P, Sridhar N (2016). Micronutrient composition of 35 food fishes from India and their significance in human nutrition. Biol Trace Elem. Res., 174(2): 448–458

Moreau MF, Surico-Bennett, J Vicario-Fisher, M Gerads, R Gersberg RM, Hurlbert SH (2007) Selenium, arsenic, DDT and other contaminants in four fish species in the Salton Sea, California, their temporal trends, and their potential impact on human consumers and wildlife. Lake Reserv.

Manage 235:536-569

Nadal M, Ferre-Huget N, Marti-Cid R, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL(2008). Exposure to metals through the conumption of fish and seafood by

population living near the Ebro river in Catalonia, Spain: health risks. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess 14:780-795

Nascimento JLM, Oliveira KRM, Crespo-Lopez, ME Macchi, BM Maues, LAL Pinheiro, MCN Silveira, LC Herculano AM (2008). Methylmercury neurotoxicity and antioxidant defenses. Indian J Med Res128: 373-382

O’ConnorJJ, Lecchini D, Beck H J, Cadiou G, Lecellier G, Booth DJ, Nakamura Y. (2015). Sediment pollution impacts sensory ability and performance of settling coral-reef fish. Oecologia, 180: 11-21

Rahman MM, Rahman MA, Hasegawa H, Miah MAM (2008) Ecosystem aspects of arsenic poisoning: Human exposure to arsenic from food chain. Asian J Water Environ. Poll., 5: 79-84

Saei-Dehkordi SS, Fallah AA, Nematollahi A (2010). Arsenic and mercury in commercially valuable fish species from the Persian Gulf: Influence of

season and habitat Food Chem.Toxicol 48: 2945-2950

Samanta S (2013) Metal and pesticide pollution scenario in Ganga river system Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 16: 454-464

Shah AQ, Kazi TG, Arian MB, Jamali MK, Afridi HI, Jalbani N, Baig JA, Kandhro GA (2009) Accumulation of arsenic in different fresh water

fish species-potential contribution to high arsenic intakes Food Chem 112: 520-524

Sinha RK, Sinha SK, Kedia DK, Kumari A, Rani N, Sharma G, Prasad K (2007). A holistic study on mercury pollution in the Ganga river system at

Varanasi, India. Curr. Sci. 92: 1223-1227

Trautwein C, Schinegger R, Schmutz S (2013) Divergent reaction of fish matrics to human pressure in fish assemblage types in Europe. Hydrobiologia 718: 207-220

Vieira C, Morais S, Ramos S, Delerue-Matos C, Oliveira MBPP (2011) Mercury, cadmium, lead and arsenic levels in three pelagic fish species from the Atlantic Ocean: Intra- and inter-specific variability and human health risks for consumption. Food Chem. Toxicol 49:923-932

Winner WE, Bewley JD (1978) Terrestrial mosses as bioindicators of SO2 pollution stress. Oecologia, 35(2): 221-230

WSDE (2002) Washington State Department of Ecology. Inorganic arsenic levels in puget sound fish and shellfish from 303(d) Listed Waterbodies

and Other Areas.

http://www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0203057.html.

Zahir F, Rizwi JS, Haq KS, Khan HR(2005) Low dose mercury toxicity and human health Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 2:351-360

ZhouQ, Zhang JFuJ, Shi J, Jiang G. (2008). Biomonitoring: an appealing tool for assessment of metal pollution in the aquatic ecosystem. Anal.

Chin Acta 606: 135-50

Downloads

Submitted

2021-08-11

Published

2021-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MOHANTY, B. P., GANGULY, S., MAHANTY, A., MITRA, T., PARIA, P., BEHERA, B. K., & DAS, B. K. (2021). ESTIMATION OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY IN FISHES FROM RIVER GANGA FOR RIVERINE ECOSYSTEM HEALTH BIOMONITORING AND ASSESSMENT. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 49(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.49.1.2017.113785