Effect of stocking density on growth, feed utilization and survival of an endangered Tor khudree fry in floating cages in a tropical reservoir


405 / 0

Authors

  • U. K. Subuddhi
  • A. K. Das
  • R. K. Choudhary
  • P. Mishal
  • N. Biswas

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.1-2.2021.115783

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of stocking density on growth, survival rate and feed conversion ratio of fry of Tor khudree, an endangered fish reared at three different densities in the floating cages installed in Kerwa reservoir, Madhya Pradesh, India. The fish fry (36.37mm, 0.71g) were stocked in three different stocking densities (0.07, 0.14 and 0.21 kg m-3 respectively corresponding to treatments T1 (100 nos. m-3), T2 (200 nos. m-3), and T3 (300 nos. m-3). The growth data were collected fortnightly and the experiment was conducted for 120 days. Fish were fed with commercial feed (crude protein 26-35%) thrice a day @8-10% of the body weight. The final weights of the fish reached weight (mean ± S.D.) of 9.3±1.97 g, 9.18±2.43 g and 4.53±1.42 g in T1, T2 and T3 respectively. The feed conversion ratio and mean survival rates were estimated at 1.48, 1.52 and 2.59, and 78.50, 77.99 and 64.11% respectively in T1, T2 and T3. The study showed that the stocking density of 100 and 200 nos./m-3 had similar growth rate, feed conversion and survival rate revealing an ideal stocking density of 200 nos.m-3 for fingerling raising in cages without affecting the growth, feed utilisation and survival. The present study demonstrates optimum rearing density of Tor khudree fry in enclosure system to promote mahseer culture with better growth and production which would help in conservation of this endangered species.

Key words Cage aquaculture, Stocking density, Mahaseer, Kerwa reservoir, M.P., India

References

1. APHA, 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water

2. and waste water, 23rd edition. Published jointly by

3. American Public Health Association and water

4. Pollution control Federation, Washington, DC, USA

5. Adoni A. D. 1985. Workbook of Limnology. Indian MAB

6. committee Department of Environment, Government

7. of India

8. Beveridge, M. 2004. Cage Aquaculture, 3nd edn, Blackwell

9. publication, Oxford, 368 p.

10. Bhattacharjya, B. K., Manna, R. K., Sharma, K. K. and Biswas, A. 2008. Growth performance of Indian Major and

11. minor carps in cage aquaculture for raising stocking

12. materials in Puthimari Beel, Assam. Journal of Inland

13. Fisheries Society of India, 40(1): 93-98.

14. Chakraborty S. M. and Banerjee S. 2012. Comparative growth

15. performance of mixed-sex and monosex Nile tilapia at

16. various stocking densities during cage culture. Recent

17. Research in Science and Technology, 4(11):46-50.

18. Chua T. E. and Teng S. K. 1980. Economic production of

19. estuary grouper Epinephelus salmoides Maxwell - Ed in

20. floating cages. Aquaculture, 20:187-228.

21. Das, A. K., Vass, K. K., Shrivastava N. P. and Katiha, P. K.

22. Cage Culture in reservoirs in India (A Handbook),

23. Worldfish Centre Technical Manual No. 1948, The

24. Worldfish Centre, Penang, Malaysia, 24p.

25. Das, A. K., Sharma A. P., Jha B. C. and Biswas, B. K. 2013.

26. Fishes of Madhya Pradesh. ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore,

27. p.

28. DoF, Govt. of MP. 2012. Annual Report, 2012. Department of

29. Fisheries, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

30. IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and

31. Natural Resources) 2014. http://www.iucnredlist.org.

32. Kalita, K., Bhagapati, S. K and Sarma, D. K. 2007. Status of

33. threatened fishes in Assam. Fishing Chimes, 26 (10):

34. -44.

35. Kohli Singh, M. P., Ayyappan, S., Ogale, S. N., Langar, R. K.

36. Prakash, C., Kiran Dube, Reddy, A. K., Patel M. B.

37. and Saharan N. 2002. Observation on the performance

38. of Tor khudree in floating cages in open waters.

39. Applied Fisheries & Aquacuture, II (I):51-57.

40. Maheshwari, R. U. 1984. Studies on the cage culture of prawns,

41. Penaeus indicus and P. monodon. In: Proc. Natl.

42. Seminar on Cage and Pen culture, Fisheries College,

43. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Tuticorin, March

44. -19, 1983. TNAU, pp. 95-98.

45. Menon, V. R. 1983. On the results of rearing carps fry in

46. floating nurseries in Tamil Nadu. In Proc. Nat.

47. Symposium on Cage-Pen Culture, TNAU, Tuticorin,

48. March 18-19, 1983, pp. 17-22

49. Natarajan. A. V., Saxena, R. K. and Shrivastava, N. K. 1979.

50. Raising quality fish seeds in floating nurseries in India.

51. Asian Aquaculture, 2(8): 4-5 &8.

52. NCA 1976. National Commission on Aquaculture Report, VIII.

53. Fisheries. New Delhi : Ministry of Agriculture and

54. Irrigation, Govt. of India.

55. Pantulu, V. R. 1979. Floating cage culture of fish in the lower

56. Mekong River Basin. In: Advances in Aquaculture. T V

57. R Pillay and W A Dill (eds.) Fishing News Books Ltd.,

58. Farnham, Surrey, pp. 423-427.

59. Rajyalakshmi T. and Ramchandran P. 1980. Prospects of pen

60. and cage culture of prawns in brackishwater. In: Summer

61. Institute, Brackishwater capture and culture fisheries,

62. ICAR-CIFRI, Barrackpore.

63. Rao K. S., Chatterjee, S. N. and Sing, K. A. 1991. Studies on

64. pre-impoundment fishery potential of Narmada Basin

65. (Western Region) in the context of Indira Sagar,

66. Maheshwar, Omkareswar and Sardar Sarover reservoir,

67. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 23(1):

68. -91.

69. Reksalegora, O. 1979. Fish cage culture in the town of Jambi,

70. Indonesia, pp51-53. In: Proc. IDRC/SEAFDEC Int.

71. Workshop on Pen and cage culture of fish, Tigbauen,

72. lloilo, Philippines. 11-22 Feb., 1979. SEAFDEC, lloilo.

73. Sampath, V. and Menon, V. R., 1975. Preliminary experiments

74. in the cage culture of prawns at Kovelong in Tamil

75. Nadu. Bull Dep. Mar. Sci. Univ. Cochin, 7: 467-476.

76. Sarkar, U. K., Mahapatra, B. K., Saxena, S. R. and Singh, A. K.,

77. Mahseer in India: An overview on research status

78. and future priorities. J. Ecophysiol. Occupat Health,

79. (1/2): 45.

80. Sarkar, U. K., Sandhya, K. M., Mishal, P., Karnatak, G.,

81. Lianthuamluaia, Kumari, S. et al., 2018. Status,

82. prospects, threats, and way forward for sustainable

83. management and enhancement of the tropical Indian

84. reservoirs fisheries: An Overview. Reviews Fish Sci

85. Aquacult., 26(2): 155-175.

86. Sunder, S., Mohan, M., Raina, H.S., Singh, R. and Halder, R. S.,

87. Culture of golden mahseer, Tor putitora

88. (Hamilton) in Kumaon Himalaya. Mass scale

89. production of stocking material. In Proc. Third Indian

90. Fisheries Forum, pp. 45-48.

91. Tamot, P., Mishra R. and Somdutt, 2008. Water quality

92. monitoring of Halali reservoir with reference to cage

93. aquaculture as a modern tool for obtaining enhanced

94. fish production, pp318-324. Proceedings of Taal 2007:

95. The 12th World Lake Conference, Jaipur, Rajasthan,

96. India.

97. Thomas, H. S. 1897. The rod in India. 3rd ed. W. Thacker and

98. Co., London.

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Subuddhi, U. K., Das, A. K., Choudhary, R. K., Mishal, P., & Biswas, N. (2026). Effect of stocking density on growth, feed utilization and survival of an endangered Tor khudree fry in floating cages in a tropical reservoir. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 53(1-2), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.1-2.2021.115783