INFLUENCE OF TURBIDITY ON THE SHOALING PREFERENCES OF PUNTIUS SARANA SUBNASUTUS


105 / 0

Authors

  • JILNA ALEX N.
  • JOHN THOMAS K.

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.43.2.2011.118372

Abstract

Turbidity is one of the important physical characteristic of water that affects its optical property. At extremely high levels, turbidity can directly affect fish growth and survival, for example, by interfering with gill function or the quality of substrata for egg laying (Bash et. al., 2001). By limiting the photic zone, turbidity can also reduce the foraging success by diminishing the prey contrast (Sweka and Hartman, 2001) or it may reduce the time available for the prey to detect predators (Berger et al., 2004).

References

Alex, J. and Thomas, K. J. 2011. Factors influencing shoaling preferences in Puntius sarana subnasutus. Curr. Sci., 100 (5) : 633-634.

Agrillo, C., Dadda, G., Serena, G. and Bisazza, A. 2008. Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquito fish. Anim. Cogn., 11 : 495-503.

Bash, J., Berman, C. and Bolton, S. 2001. Effects of turbidity and suspended solids on salmonids. Center for Streamside Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Berg, L. and Northcote, T. G. 1985. Changes in territorial, gill-flaring and feeding-behaviour in juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) following short-term pulses of suspended sediment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 42 (8) : 1410-1417.

Berger, R., Bergstrom, L., Graneli, E. and Kautsky, L. 2004. How does eutrophication affect different life stages of Fucus vesiculosus in the Baltic Sea? A conceptual model. Hydrobiologia., 514 (1-3) : 243-248.

Clesceri, L.S., Greenberg, A. E. and Eaton, A. D. 1998.

Measurement of Turbidity, pp 2-10. In Clesceri, L.S, Greenberg, A. E. and Eaton, A. D. (ed.), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. United Book Press, Inc., Baltimore, Maryland.

Guthrie, D. M. and Muntz, W. R. A. 1993. Role of vision in fish behavior, pp 363-439. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London.

Madej, M. A., Wilzbach, M., Cummins, K., Ellis, C. and Hadden, S. 2004. The Significance of Suspended Organic Sediments to Turbidity, Sediment Flux, and Fish-Feeding Behavior. Paper presented at the

Redwood Region Forest Science Symposium, 15-17 March, Rohnert Park, CA.

Pitcher, T. J. and Parrish, J. K. 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts, pp 363-439. In Pitcher, T. J. (ed.), Behaviour of Teleost Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London.

Shaw, E. 1978. Schooling Fishes. Am. Sci., 66 : 166-175.

Sweka, J. A. and Hartman, K. J. 2001. Effects of turbidity on prey consumption and growth in brook trout and implications for bioenergetics modeling. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 58 : 386–393.

Ward, A. J. W., Hart, P. J. B. and Krause, J. 2004. The effect of habitat and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol., 15 (6) : 925-929.

Wong, B. M. and Rosenthal, G. G. 2005. Shoal choice in swordtails when preferences conflict. Ethology, 111 : 179-186.

Downloads

Submitted

2021-11-27

Published

2021-11-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

N., J. A., & K., J. T. (2021). INFLUENCE OF TURBIDITY ON THE SHOALING PREFERENCES OF PUNTIUS SARANA SUBNASUTUS. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 43(2), 79-81. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.43.2.2011.118372