SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SIA) OF CERTAIN COASTAL AQUACULTURE PROJECTS OF WEST BENGAL


192 / 0

Authors

  • R. K. TRIVEDI
  • PAPRI R. DAS
  • B. K. DAS
  • S. K. ROUT
  • K. MUKHOPADHYAY

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.42.2.2010.121373

Abstract

There have been substantial socio-economic benefits as well as social and environmental conflicts due to expansion of coastal aquaculture in the country. The present study was carried out in three coastal aquacultural projects in the two blocks in the East Midnapore district of West Bengal to assess the social impacts of these projects. The information was obtained based on participatory approach and qualitative interview techniques. Some of the adverse impacts reported by the people were decline in respect to elderly persons, increase in the vulnerability to hazards and increase in frequency of damage to agriculture and fishery crops. However some positive impacts like better community infrastructure, improvement in sense of security, increase in household income and availability of better infrastructure and transportation facilities due to these projects were also reported.

Keywords : Social, impact, environmental conflict, coastal, aquaculture, project

References

Burbridge, P., Hendrick, V., Roth, E. and Rosenthal, H. 2001. Social and economic policy issues relevant to marine aquaculture. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 17: 194-206.

Chitambar, J. B. 1973. In Introductory Rural Sociology, A Synopsis of concepts and principles, Wiley Eastern Limited.

Dewalt, B. R., Vergne, P. and Hardin, M. 1996. Shrimp aquaculture development and the environment: people, mangroves and fisheries on the Gulf of Fonseca. World Development, 24: 1193-1208.

Dixon, J. and Fookes, T. 1988. Environmental assessment in New Zealand: prospects and practical realities. Aust. J. Environ. Manage., 2: 104–111.

EIA Training Resource Manual on Social Impact Assessment tools and methods. 2002. World Bank web site. Second edition. 464-475p.

[http//www.worldbank.org.]

FAO. 1988. Aspects of FAO’s policies, programmes, budget and activities aimed at contributing to sustainable development. Document to the ninety-fourth Session of the FAO Council, Rome, November 1988. Rome, FAO. CL, 94(6): 15-25.

National Marine Fisheries Service. 1991. Guidelines for assessment of the Social Impact of Fishery Management actions. [http: //www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/ reg-svcs/index.htm.]

Shastri Indo-Canadian Institute (SICI), New Delhi 2004 report. [www.sici.org/2004 shastri/studysite2_report]

Taylor, C. N., Bryan, C. H. and Goodrich, C. G. 1990. Social Assessment: Theory, Process and Techniques. Centre for Resource Management, Lincoln University, New Zealand.

Tobey, J., Clay, J. and Philippe, V. 1998. The Economic, Environmental and Social Impacts of Shrimp Farming in Latin America. Coastal Resources Center: University of Rhode Island.

Vanclay, F. 1999. Social Impact Assessment. 301-326 p. In Petts, J. (ed.) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Vanclay, F. 2003. International Principles for Social Impact Assessment, IAIA Special Publication Series No. 2: 1-3.

Submitted

2022-02-11

Published

2022-02-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TRIVEDI, R. K., DAS, P. R., DAS, B. K., ROUT, S. K., & MUKHOPADHYAY, K. (2022). SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SIA) OF CERTAIN COASTAL AQUACULTURE PROJECTS OF WEST BENGAL. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 42(2), 35-41. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.42.2.2010.121373