A study on ground reality of freshwater fish farming in biofloc tank in West Bengal, India


730 / 0

Authors

  • Prasenjit Mali
  • Swagat Ghosh
  • Gadadhar Dash
  • T. Jawahar
  • Supratim Chowdhury
  • Sudhir Kumar Das

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.3-4.2021.122360

Abstract

Introduction of land-based biofloc technology has brought huge changes in concept of fish farming. The practice of biofloc farming is gaining popularity amidst COVID-19 situation. For the present study on biofloc tank farming in West Bengal, 110 biofloc farmers who had harvested at least one crop, were selected through simple random sampling method, from a list of 390 biofloc farmers from 13 districts of West Bengal. Data were collected from the selected respondents during the last quarter of 2020, according to a structured interview schedule on every minute aspect on culture strategies, technical issues, profit gain and prospect. Oreochromis niloticus was found to be the most cultured species followed by Anabas cobojius, Catfishes Heteropneustes fossilis and Clarias batrachus, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus and Labeo bata. Majorities of the respondents were found young, educated, least experienced and small scale investors. Disease outbreaks and mass mortalities were found very common to all. Disease prevention strategies and therapeutic measurements were found quite unsatisfactory. Most respondents failed to achieve their expected profit. Only 13.6% farmers were found to be highly satisfied, whereas, 62.7% were dissatisfied but continue the culture and 23.7% were highly disappointed. Synchronizing C:N ratio with microbial dynamics by the famers was found to be the major gap in technical knowhow. 

Key words Biofloc culture, Freshwater fish, West Bengal

References

1. Ahmad, I., Babitha Rani, A. M., Verma, A. K. and Maqsood, M.

2. Biofloc technology: An emerging avenue in aquatic

3. animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquaculture

4. International, 25: 1215–1226. DOI 10.1007/s10499-

5. -0108-8

6. Avnimelech, Y. 2006. Bio-filters: The need for a new

7. comprehensive approach. Aquaculture Engineering, 34:

8. –178.

9. Avnimelech, Y. 2009. Biofloc technology - a practical guide

10. book. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge,

11. Louisiana, United States. 182 p.

12. Azim, M. E. and Little, D. C. 2008. The biofloc technology

13. (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc

14. composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia

15. (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 283: 29-35.

16. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036

17. de Oliveira, E. G., Pinheiro, A. B., de Oliveira, V. Q., da Silva, A.

18. R. M., de Moraes, M. G., Rocha, I. R. C. B., de Sousa, R.

19. R. and Costa, F. H. F. 2012. Effects of stocking density

20. on the performance of juvenile pirarucu (Arapaima

21. gigas) in cages. Aquaculture, 370–371: 96–101.

22. Ekasari. J., Rivandi, D. R., Firdausi, A. P., Surawidjaja, E. H,

23. Zairin Jr, M., Bossier, P. and De Schryver, P. 2015.

24. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia

25. (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance.

26. Aquaculture, 441: 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/

27. are.12784

28. M’balaka, M., Kassam, D. and Rusuwa, B. 2012. The effect of

29. stocking density on the growth and survival of improved

30. and unimproved strains of Oreochromis shiranus.

31. Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research, 38: 205–211.

32. Zaki, M. A. A., Alabssawy, A. N., Nour, A. E. M., El Basuini, M.

33. F., Dawoode, M. A. O., Alkahtani, S. and Abdel-Daim,

34. M. M. 2020. The impact of stocking density and dietary

35. carbon sources on the growth, oxidative status and stress

36. markers of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) reared

37. under biofloc conditions. Aquaculture Reports, 16:

38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100282

39. Randall, D. and Tsui, T. K. 2002. Ammonia toxicity in fish.

40. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 45: 17–23.

41. Wang, C., Pan, L., Zhang, K., Xu, W., Zhao, D. and Mei, L.

42. Effects of different carbon sources addition on

43. nutrition composition and extracellular enzymes

44. activity of bioflocs, and digestive enzymes activity and

45. growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in zero

46. exchange culture tanks. Aquaculture Research, 47:

47. –3318.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mali, P., Ghosh, S., Dash, G., Jawahar, T., Chowdhury, S., & Das, S. K. (2026). A study on ground reality of freshwater fish farming in biofloc tank in West Bengal, India. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 53(3-4), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.3-4.2021.122360