Effect of ethanolic extract of Euglena viridis on enzymatic profiles of Labeo rohita (Ham.) and protection against Aeromonas hydrophila infection
209 / 0
Abstract
Effect of administration of ethanolic extract of Euglena viridis on liver enzyme profiles of Labeo rohita was investigated. Fish fingerlings were injected with the fractions of ethanolic extracts, viz., Ef1, Ef2 (5% ethylacetate/hexane), Ef3 (10% ethylacetate/hexane) and Ef4, Ef5 (30% ethylacetate/hexane) of Euglena viridis. The treated fish were challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila to assess the survival rate and enzyme profile. The serum samples were assayed for activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and acid phosphatase (ACP) enzymes. Results showed no significant difference in ACP activity between the pre-challenged 5% ethylacetate/hexane and 10% ethylacetate/hexane injected group and control. Similar insignificant variation in ALT activity was observed in all the exposure periods before the challenge. Significantly (p≤0.05) different AST activity was observed in all the injected groups on the 10th day post-challenge in comparison to the control. On 10 days of post- challenge, survival of fish that received the fractions of ethanolic extracts of E. viridis with 5% ethylacetate/ hexane and 30% ethylacetate/hexane was significantly higher than the control fish. The results suggest that Euglena extract enhances the resistance of L. rohita against A. hydrophila and has the potential for use in health management in fish.
Key words Aeromonas hydrophila; Alkaline phosphatase; Euglena viridis; Immunostimulation
References
1. Abutbul, S., Golan-Goldhirsh, A., Barazani, O. and Zilberg, D.
2. Use of Rosmarinus officinalis as a treatment
3. against Streptococcus iniae in tilapia (Oreochromis sp.).
4. Aquaculture, 238(1-4): 97-105.
5. Anderson, D. P. 1992. Immunostimulants, adjuvants and vaccine
6. carriers in fish: application to aquaculture. Annual
7. Review of Fish Diseases, 2: 281-307.
8. Anonymous, 2020. National Fisheries Development Board
9. (NFDB), Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries,
10. Animal Husbandry & Dairying, Government of India.
11. http://nfdb.gov.in/about-indianfisheries.htm.
12. Balint, T., Ferenczy, J., Katai, F., Kiss, I., Kroazc, L., Lang, G.,
13. Polyhos, C., Szabo, I. and Nemesok, J. 1977. Similarities
14. and differences between the massive eel (Aguilla
15. anguilla) devastation that occurs in Lake Ablation in
16. and 1995. Ecotoxicology and Environmental
17. Safety, 37(1): 17-23.
18. Barsanti, L., Vismara, R., Passarelli, V. and Gualtieri, P. 2001.
19. Paramylon (b-1,3-glucan) content in wild type and
20. WZSL mutant of Euglena gracilis. Effects of growth
21. conditions. Journal of Applied Phycology, 13: 59-65.
22. Biswas, K. 1949. Common fresh and brackish water algal flora
23. of India and Burma, Part I. Records of Botanical Survey
24. of India 15.
25. Bricknell, I. and Dalmo, R. A. 2005. The use of immunostimulants
26. in fish larval aquaculture. Fish and Shellfish Immunology,
27. (5): 457-72.
28. Citarasu, T, Venkatramalingam, K, Babu, M. M., Sekar, R. R. J.
29. and Petermarian, M. 2003. Influence of the antibacterial
30. herbs, Solanum trilobatum, Andrographis paniculata
31. and Psoralea corylifolia on the survival, growth and
32. bacterial load of Penaeus monodon post larvae.
33. Aquaculture International, 11: 583-595.
34. Das, P. C., Ayyappan, S., Das, B. K. and Jena, J. K. 2004. Nitrite
35. toxicity in Indian major carps: Sublethal effect on
36. selected enzymes in fingerlings of Catla catla, Labeo
37. rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala. Comparative Biochemistry
38. and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology,
39. : 3-10.
40. Das, B. K., Pradhan, J. and Sahu, S. 2009. The effect of Euglena
41. viridis on immune response of rohu, Labeo rohita
42. (Ham.). Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 26(6): 871-
43.
44. Das, B. K., Pradhan, J., Mahammad, S. and Nayak, K. K. 2012.
45. In vitro cytotoxic and antibacterial activity of ethanolic
46. extract of Euglena viridis. International Journal of
47. Pharma and Bio Sciences, 3(4)(B): 321-331.
48. Das, B. K., Pradhan, J., Pattnaik, P., Samantaray, B. R. and
49. Samal, S. K. 2005. Production of antibacterials from
50. the freshwater alga Euglena viridis (Ehren). World
51. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 21(1):
52. -50.
53. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests.
54. Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
55. Duncan, P. and Klesius, P. 1996. Effects of Spirulina on specific
56. and non-specific immune responses of channel catfish.
57. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, 8(4): 308-13.
58. Devasree, L. D., Binuramesh, C. and Michael, R. D. 2012.
59. Immunostimulatory effect of water soluble fraction of
60. Nyctanthes arbor-tristis leaves on the immune response
61. in Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters). Aquaculture,
62. (10): 1581-1590.
63. Ellis, A. E. 1988. Fish vaccination. Academic Press, London.
64. Foltinova, P., Lahitova, N. and Ebringer, L. 1994.
65. Antimutagenicity in Euglena gracilis. Mutation
66. Research, 323(4):167-71.
67. Ganguly, T. and Sainis, K. B. 2001. Inhibition of cellular immune
68. responses by Tylophora indica in experimental models,
69. Phytomedicine, 8(5): 348-355.
70. Goldfisher, S. E. and Novikoff, A. B. 1964. Use of histological,
71. histochemical assessment in the progenesis of the effects
72. of aquatic pollutants. In: Hinton, D. E., Kend, M. W.
73. and Silver, B. B. (Ed.) Sec. 528, American Society of
74. Testing materials, Philadelphia, pp. 194-208.
75. Gupta, V. and Rao, G. 1974. Histological studies on the
76. choroidpleves of the goat embryos III.
77. Hadden, J.W. 1993. Immunostimulants. Trends in
78. Pharmacolgical Sciences, 14(5): 169-174.
79. Hillmann, G. 1971.Continuous photometric measurement of
80. prostate acid phosphatase activity. Journal of Clinical
81. Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 9(3): 273-274.
82. Karunasagar, I., Ali, A., Otta, S. K. and Karunasagar, I. 1997.
83. Immunization with bacterial antigens: Infections with
84. motile Aeromonads. Developments in Biological
85. Standardization, 90: 135-141.
86. Kondo, Y., Kato, A., Hojo, H., Nozoe, S., Takeuchi, M. and
87. Ochi, K. 1992. Cytokine-related immunopotentiating
88. activities of paramylon, a ß-(1,3)-D-glucan from
89. Euglena gracilis. Journal of Pharmacobio-dynamics,
90. (11):617-21.
91. Lee, H. S., Park, H. J. and Kim, M. K. 2008. Effect of Chlorella
92. vulgaris on lipid metabolism in Wistar rats fed high fat
93. diet. Nutrition Research and Practice, 2(4): 204-210.
94. Motl, O. and Novotny, L. 1997. Adsorption column
95. chromatography, In: Laboratory handbook of
96. chromatography and allied methods (Ed. by Mikis, O.),
97. Ellis Horwoods Ltd., Chichester, pp. 150-217.
98. Mulero, V., Esteban, M. A., Munoz, J. and Meseguer, J. 1998.
99. Dietary intake of levamisole enhances the immune
100. response and disease resistance of the marine teleost
101. gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L). Fish and Shellfish
102. Immunology, 8(1): 49-62.
103. Oda, T. 1990. The biology of liver. University of Tokyo Press,
104. Tokyo, 140 p.
105. Oluah, N. S. 1999. Plasma aspartate aminotransferase activity
106. in the catfish Clarias albopunctatus exposure to
107. sublethal zinc and mercury. Bulletin of Environmental
108. Contamination and Toxicology, 63(3): 343-349.
109. Ortuno, J., Esteban, M.A. and Meseguer, J. 1999. Effect of high
110. dietary intake of vitamin C on non-specific immune
111. response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish
112. and Shellfish Immunology, 9(5): 429-443.
113. Ozaki, H. 1978. Diagnosis of fish health by blood analysis. In:
114. Respiration and circulation of fish, vol. 24. Itazawa, Y.
115. Hanyu, I and Hibiya, K. (Ed.), Koseisya Koseikaku,
116. Tokyo, pp. 63-80.
117. Pilo, B., Ansari, M. V. and Shah, R. V. 1972. Studies of wound
118. healing and repair in pigeon liver III. Histochemical
119. studies on acid and alkaline phosphatase activities during
120. the process. Journal of Animal Morphology and
121. Physiology, 19: 205-212.
122. Pradhan, J., Das, B. K., Sahu, S. and Marhual, N. P. 2015. Effect
123. of dietary Chlorella vulgaris on enzymatic profiles of
124. rohu, Labeo rohita (Ham.) infected with Aeromonas
125. hydrophila. Indian Journal Fisheries, 62(2): 132-136.
126. Quesada, L. A., de Lustig, E. S., Marechal, L. R., and Belocopitow,
127. E. 1976. Antitumor activity of paramylon on sarcoma180 in mice. Gann, 67(3): 455-459.
128. Rajyasree, M. and Neeraja, P. 1989. Aspartate and alanine
129. aminotransferase activities in fish tissue subcellular
130. fractionation on exposure to ambient urea. Indian
131. Journal of Fisheries, 36(1):88-91.
132. Rath, R. K., 1993. Freshwater Aquaculture, in Fish diseases and
133. fish health management (Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur,
134. India), 282p.
135. Reddy, M. S. and Rao, K. V. 1991. Methylparathion induced
136. alterations in the tissue carbohydrate catabolism of
137. marine prawn, Metapenaeus monoceros. Bulletin of
138. Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 47(6):
139. -932.
140. Rosalki, R. S. 1993. Boerhringer Mannheim GmbH analysis
141. protocol. Clinical Chemistry, 39(4): 648-452.
142. Sahu, S., Das, B. K., Pradhan, J., Mishra, B. K., Samal, S. K. and
143. Sarangi, N. 2008. Effect of dietary Curcuma longa on
144. enzymatic and immunological profiles of rohu, Labeo
145. rohita (Ham.) infected with Aeromonas hydrophila.
146. Aquaculture Research, 39(16): 1720-1730.
147. Sakai, M., Taniguchi, K., Mamoto, K., Ogawa, H. and Tabata,
148. M. 2001.Immunostimulant effects of nucleotide isolated
149. from yeast RNA on carp, Cyprinus carpio L. Journal of
150. Fish Diseases, 24(8):433-438.
151. Sarika, J., Pandhi, P., Singh, A. P. and Samir, M. 2006. Efficacy
152. of standardised herbal extracts in type 1 diabetes - an
153. experimental study. African Journal of Traditional,
154. Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 3 (4): 23-
155.
156. Stahl, E. 1969. Apparatus and general technique in TLC, In:
157. Thin Layer Chromatography, (Ed. Stahl, E.,) Springer
158. Verlag, Berlin, pp. 52-85.
159. Tayag, C. M., Lin, Y. C., Li, C. C., Liou, C. H. and Chen, J. C.
160. Administration of the hot-water extract of
161. Spirulina platensis enhanced the immune response of
162. white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and its resistance
163. against Vibrio alginolyticus. Fish and Shellfish
164. Immunology, 28(5-6): 764-73.
165. Wallnofer, H., Schmidt, E. and Schmidt, F.W. 1974. Synopsis
166. der Leberkrankheiten. Georg Thieme Verlag. Stuttgart.
167. Watanuki, H., Ota, H., Tassakka, ACMAR., Kato, T. and Sakai,
168. M. 2006. Immunostimulant effects of dietary Spirulina
169. platensis on carp, Cyprinus carpio. Aquaculture, 258(1-
170. : 157-163.
171. Bagum, N., Monir, M. S. and Khan, M. H. 2013. Present status
172. of fish diseases and economic losses due to incidence of
173. disease in rural freshwater aquaculture of Bangladesh.
174. Journal of Innovation and Developmental Strategy,
175. (3): 48-53.
176. Mohan, C. V. and Bhatta, R. 2002. Social and economic impacts
177. of aquatic animal health problems on aquaculture in
178. India. In: Arthur, J. R., Phillips, M. J., Subasinghe, R. P.,
179. Reantaso, M. B., Mac Rae (eds.). Primary aquatic animal
180. healthcare in rural, small-scale, aquaculture development.
181. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
182. Nations, Rome, Italy.
183. Sandeep, P., Chamundeswari, D. B. and Kumar, K. P. 2016.
184. Present status of parasitic and bacterial diseases in fresh
185. water fish seed farms in East Godavari district, Andhra
186. Pradesh. International Journal of Applied and Pure
187. Science and Agriculture, 2: 117-121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In case of publication of the article in the journal, author(s) are required to assign copyright to the Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India for its publication in any form/language including all media (print and electronic, or presently unknown), and exclusive right to use the matter for the life of the work (no time restriction on re use of matter).