Fish consumption pattern in Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal


274 / 0

Authors

  • Shyam S Salim
  • Lowrane Stanley
  • Shinu A. M
  • Swatipriyanka Sen

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.3-4.2021.122370

Abstract

Fish consumption is determined by the level of income and its easy availability, affordability and accessibility. The consumption of fish is increasing significantly due to varying taste and preferences, lifestyle changes and higher cost of protein substitutes like meat and meat products. The determinants of fish demand and the consumption pattern differ across regions, seasons, income levels, beliefs, customs and traditions, besides several other factors. The present study was carried out in Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal to find out the fish consumption profile of selected households and to identify the factors that drive people for fish consumption. A total of 253 respondents have been selected using purposive sampling method and interviewed for obtaining pertinent data. The study revealed that the average monthly household fish consumption across the study area was 7.65 kg. Majority of the non-vegetarian consumers in the study area had the highest preference for fish followed by chicken, and mutton. The average monthly expenditure on fish per family in the study area constituted 26.64% of overall total food expenditure. Majority of consumers (69.6%) consumed fish on daily basis, 22.1% alternatively, 4% of the respondents twice in a week and only 4.3% consumed fish once a week. Among different factors, freshness and taste of fish influenced fish consumption. There were some limiting factors in augmenting fish consumption high price of fish followed by irregular supply and wide fluctuations in price. Different statistical and econometric tools such as RESEARCH PAPER conjoint analysis, preference assessment index were deployed for analyzing the data. The study suggests that to make regular supply and availability of fish at lower price the state government should focus on productivity enhancement programs in small water bodies, aquaculture development, and better utilization of small pelagic fish for increasing food fish supplies in the region.

Key words Fish consumption; Conjoint analysis; Preference assessment index; Garrette ranking

References

1. Ahmad, N. I., Wan Mahiyuddin, W. R., Tengku Mohamad, T.

2. R., Ling, C. Y., Daud, S. F., Hussein, N. C. and Sulaiman,

3. L. H. 2016. Fish consumption pattern among adults of

4. different ethnics in Peninsular Malaysia. Food and

5. Nutrition Research, 60(1): 32697.

6. Bhatt, R. 2001. Production, accessibility and consumption

7. patterns of aquaculture products in India. In: Production,

8. accessibility, marketing and consumption patterns of

9. freshwater aquaculture products in Asia: A cross country

10. comparison. FAO Fisheries Circular, 973: 147-190.

11. Bhutia, T. P., Qureshi, N. W. and Yadav, V. K. 2019. Factors

12. affecting fish consumption in traditional fish markets

13. of Kolkata City, West Bengal. International Journal of

14. Pure Applied Bioscience, 7(2): 39-43

15. Bhuyan, P. C., Goswami, C. and Kakati, B. K. 2017. Study of

16. fish consumption patterns in Assam for development

17. of market driven strategies. Research Journal of

18. Chemical and Environmental Sciences, 5(6): 42-52

19. Dutta, S., Chakraborty, K. and Hazra, S. 2015. The status of the

20. marine fisheries of West Bengal coast of the northern

21. Bay of Bengal and its management options: A review.

22. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 69, 10.1007/

23. s12595-015-0138-7.

24. Gopal, N. and Annamalai, V. 2001. Fish consumption profile of

25. Cochin households. Fishery Technology, 38(1): 62-65

26. Kumar, H., Singh, R., Verma, S. C. and Pal, V. K. 2019. Multiobjective programming (MOP) model for aquaculture

27. production systems in the Northern India. International

28. Journal of Research Engineering, Science Management,

29. (4): 295-298.

30. Majagi S. H. and Somashekar D. S.2020. Survey of fish

31. consumption pattern in households of Shivamogga,

32. Karnataka. International Journal of Fisheries and

33. Aquatic Studies, 8(4): 113-115

34. Salauddin Palash, M. and Sabur, S. A. 2004. Consumption pattern

35. and consumer behaviour of fish in Dhaka city. Journal

36. of Bangladesh Agricultural University, 2(2): 361-370.

37. Shyam, S. S. 2016. Fish consumption pattern in India: Paradigm

38. shifts and paradox of export trade (Fish consumption

39. pattern in India, exports - Overview). Food and Beverage

40. News,10(2): 25-28.

41. Shyam, S. S, Athira, N. R., Athira, P. R., Safeena, P. K., Rahman,

42. M. R., Reeja, F, Remya, R. and Smitha R. X. 2019.

43. Assessing demand drivers in augmenting fish

44. consumption in Ernakulam. Indian Journal of

45. Economics and Development, 7 (5): 1-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Salim, S. S., Stanley, L., M, S. A., & Sen, S. (2026). Fish consumption pattern in Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 53(3-4), 201-209. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.53.3-4.2021.122370