MANAGEMENT REGIME AND ITS IMPACT ON THE WETLAND FISHERIES IN ASSAM


168 / 1

Authors

  • GANESH CHANDRA

https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.46.1.2014.92375

Abstract

The floodplain wetlands (beels) in Assam extending over one lakh hectare, constitute the most important fishery resource of the state. These wetlands are the common property resource and under various management regimes, i.e., private management (individuals and groups), fishermen cooperative management, Community-based fisheries management (decentralized management, Government works as facilitator) and open access. Most of the unregistered beels are under open access. An impact study was undertaken in two wetlands of Assam under private and cooperative management regimes with the objectives of to assess the impact of management regimes on the productivity of the beel; to assess the economics of beel fisheries management; and to assess the impact on the livelihood of the fisher community of wetlands.
An impact pathway was formulated for the impact analysis of management regimes on the productivity of the selected wetlands. The data were collected using structured questionnaire and focused group discussion with the lessee for privately managed beels and with secretaries for beels managed by Cooperatives. The productivity of Rawmari beel was 850 kg ha-1 yr-1 in comparison to 410 kg ha-1 yr-1 in Charan beel. The benefit accrued from private managed beels was better than the cooperative managed beels. This communication discusses in detail the positive and negative outcome of management regimes on the beel fisheries management. This communication also discusses about the sharing arrangement and benefit to community in the private and community managed wetlands.

Key words: Floodplain wetland, common property resources, fisher, lessee, management regimes, productivity

References

Chandra, G. 2007. Entrepreneurship in Beel Fisheries of Assam: A case study of Haribhanga beel pp. 173-179. In Kohli, M. P. S. (Eds.) Ecology and Fisheries in wetlands in India. Indian Society of Fisheries Professional. Mumbai, India. ISBN 81- 901431-2-3.Chandra, G. 2009. Fisher management regimes and fisheries governance in floodplain wetlands of Assam. Paper presented in “4th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture: Innovation for improving efficiency, equity and environment†held at New Delhi, India February 4-7, 2009.

Chandra, G. 2010. Impact of adoption of pen culture technology on well-being of fishers of Haribhanga wetland in Assam. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 10 (2) : 61-65.

Chandra, G. 2011. Management Regimes and Institutional Arrangement in Floodplain Wetland Fisheries of Assam: An Evaluation. Indian Journal of Extension Education 47(1-2) : 27-33.

Chandra, G. and Sharma, A. P. 2011. Management regimes and institutional Arrangement in wetland fisheries: an evaluation of two eastern states. pp. 338-339. In: Gopalakrishnan, A. et al. (eds.) Renaissance in Fisheries: Outlook and Strategies -Book of Abstracts, 9th Indian Fisheries Forum, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi and Asian Fisheries Society, Indian Branch, 19-23 December 2011, Chennai, India, 381 p.

Chandra, G., Sharma, A. P. and Sahu, S. K. 2013. Impact of pen-culture technology on fish productivity of floodplain wetlands in Asom. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83 (2) : 209-215.

Choudhury, A.B. 1998. Wetland Ecology Resources, research and conservation- an Indian Scenario. MEPS Publishers, B-1/462 Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal.

Dey, S.C. 1981. Studies on the hydrobiological condition of some beels of Kamrup district of Assam and their bearing on fish production. Final Technical Report, North-Council, Shillong, 177 pp.

Sugunan, V.V. and Bhattacharjya, B. K. 2000. Ecology and fisheries in beels of Assam. Bull. 104, Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute, Barrackpore, India: 48 p.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-08-02

Published

2020-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHANDRA, G. (2020). MANAGEMENT REGIME AND ITS IMPACT ON THE WETLAND FISHERIES IN ASSAM. Journal of the Inland Fisheries Society of India, 46(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.47780/jifsi.46.1.2014.92375