Evaluation of irrigation levels and plant geometry for drip irrigation in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

EVALUATION OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT GEOMETRY FOR DRIP IRRIGATION IN GROUNDNUT


151 / 4

Authors

  • C HARISUDAN Regional Research Station, TNAU, Vridhachalam-606 001, Tamil Nadu
  • K SUBRAHMANIYAN Regional Research Station, TNAU, Vridhachalam-606 001, Tamil Nadu

https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v37i4.136743

Keywords:

Drip irrigation, Groundnut, Irrigation levels, Plant geometry

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted for two consecutive years during kharif 2013 and 2014 to evaluate the irrigation levels and plant geometry for drip irrigation in groundnut. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with different irrigation levels in main plots viz., I1 - 100% of daily evaporation rate (Td) by drip every alternate day, I2 - 80% of daily evaporation rate (Td) by drip every alternate day, I3 - 60% of daily evaporation rate (Td) by drip every alternate day, I4 - Border strip irrigation at 1.0 IW/CPE ratio irrigation water depth (5cm). In sub plots four plant geometry levels were imposed viz., G1 - Conventional sowing (row to row : 30 cm ) with one lateral to each row, G2 - One lateral between two rows, G3 - Paired - rows (15/30 cm apart) with one median lateral to each pair, G4 - One lateral between two pairs. All the treatments were replicated three times. Among the different irrigation levels, irrigating the groundnut at 100% average daily evaporation rate (Td) by drip at alternate days had significant effect on groundnut growth and yield parameters and registered higher pod yield of 2250 kg/ha. Among the different plant geometry one lateral between two pairs significantly influenced the growth and yield parameters and recorded higher pod yield of 2205 kg/ha.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhaskaran M N and Subrahmanyan S V S 2012. Water soluble fertilizers NFCLexperience. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 8(3) : 56-61.

Kamala Bai S, Syed Mazhar Ali, Keshavareddy G, Nagaraj K H, Latha R, Kulkarni and Ranganatha S C 2019. Impact of improved production technology andmechanized decortication of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) on productivity and income of farmers in Ramanagara district of Karnataka. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 36(2): 105-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v36i2.126936

Khonok A, Amiri E and Hosseiri B 2015. Irrigation management and fertilizer of peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) with a drip irrigation system: yield, HI and water use efficiency. Biological Forum - An International Journal, 7(1): 609-616.

Loganathan S and Krishnamoorthy K K 1977. Total uptake of nutrients at different stages of the growth of groundnut and the ratios in which various nutrient elements exist in groundnut plant. Plant and Soil, 46: 565-570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00015915

Mathukia R K, Sagarka B K and Davaria R L 2014. Evaluation of micro-irrigation, fertigation and weed management in summer groundnut. Innovative Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(2): 1-2.

Patel G N, Patel P T, Patel P H, Patel D M, Patil, D K and Patil R M 2009. Yield attributes, yield, quality and uptake of nutrients by summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by sources and levels of sulphur under varying irrigation

schedules. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 26(2): 119-122.

Ranjitha S P, Ramulu V, Jayasree G and Narender Reddy S 2018. Growth, yield and water use efficiency of groundnut under drip and surface furrow irrigation. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(09): 1371-1376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.164

Saeed I A M and El-Nadi A H 1997. Irrigation effects on the growth, yield and water use efficiency of alfalfa. Irrigation Science, 17: 63-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002710050023

Soni J K, Kumar A, Kumar V, Rani S and Banerjee A 2016. Response of groundnut under micro irrigation-A Review. Progressive Research - An International Journal, 11(7): 4455-4459.

Soni J K and Raja A N 2017. Performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. VEGETOS - An International Journal of of Plant Research, 30: 2. doi: 10.5958/2229-4473.2017.00134.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2229-4473.2017.00134.3

Soni J K, Raja A N and Kumar V 2019. Improving productivity of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drip and micro sprinkler fertigation system. Legume Research - An International Journal, 42(1): 90-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/LR-3851

Suresh K, Balaguruvaiah D, Ramulu V and Sujani Rao C H 2013. Comparative efficiency ofsprinkler irrigation over check basin irrigation in groundnut at different irrigation schedules. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental

Sciences, 3(2): 9-13.

Vijayalakshmi R, Veerabadran V, Shanmuga Sundaram K and Kumar V 2011. Micro-sprinkler irrigation and fustigation and land configuration as a best management technology package for groundnut. In: 8th International Micro Irrigation Congress.

Innovation in Technology and management of micro-irrigation for crop production enhancement. 21 October 2011, Tehran, Iran, pp. 200-207.

Wane S, Bagde H and Bhuyar R C 2009. Effect of different micro-irrigation methods on growth, yield and quality of summer groundnut in Vidharbha. Green Farming, 2(6): 351-357.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-05-23

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

C HARISUDAN, & K SUBRAHMANIYAN. (2020). Evaluation of irrigation levels and plant geometry for drip irrigation in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.): EVALUATION OF IRRIGATION LEVELS AND PLANT GEOMETRY FOR DRIP IRRIGATION IN GROUNDNUT. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v37i4.136743