Plant density and nitrogen interaction on productivity of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

PLANT DENSITY AND NITROGEN INTERACTION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUMMER SESAME


111 / 3

Authors

  • K RAMESH ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
  • G SURESH ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
  • A AZIZ QURESHI ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
  • P RATNAKUMAR ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
  • PRADUMAN YADAV ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana

https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v38i1.137013

Keywords:

Nitrogen doses, Phenotypic plasticity, Plant density, Sesame

Abstract

Plant spacing manipulations affect the quality and quantity of sunlight for photosynthesis and the branching vis-à-vis crop productivity. Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different plant spacings (broadcasting, 30 x 30 cm, 45 x 30 cm and 45 x 45 cm and solid rows of 45 cm apart) in conjunction with nitrogen doses (0, 30 and 45 kg/ha) on growth rate of branches and capsules, and seed yield of sesame (Variety Sweta). Branching, a significant plant phenotypic plasticity in sesame was the main attribute affected by plant spacing and N doses. Solid rows of 45 cm apart sowing (2.2 lakh plants/ha) recorded significantly the highest seed yield (8.0 q/ha) among different plant spacing treatments. Crop raised with broadcasting method (approx 2.8 lakh plants/ha) yielded 7.4 q/ha which was significantly higher than other plant spacings of 30×30 cm (1.11 lakh plants/ha), 45×30 cm (0.74 lakh plants/ha) and 45×45 cm (0.49 lakh plants/ha). Application of 45 kg N/ha recorded significantly higher seed yield than 30 kg N/ha and no N across different plant spacings. Except 45×30 cm and 45×45 cm spacings, all other spacings recorded significantly higher seed yield for each increment in N dose.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agudamua, Taiki Yoshihiraa and Tatsuhiko Shiraiwa 2016. Branch development responses to planting density and yield stability in soybean cultivars. Plant Production Science, 19(3): 333-339.

Aristya V E and Taryono 2016. Factor wise contribution on sesame seed yield. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1755, 040007.

Ashri A 1998. Sesame breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews, 16:179-228.

Bradshaw A D 2006. Unraveling phenotypic plasticity-why should we bother?. New Phytologist, 170: 644-648.

Chapin F S III 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11: 233-260.

Delgado M and Yermanos D 1975. Yield components of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under different population densities. Economic Botany, 29(1): 69-78.

Donald C M 1963. Competition among crop and pasture plants. Advances in Agronomy, 15: 1-118.

Haruna I 2011. Growth and yield of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by nitrogen and intra row spacing in Lafia, Nasarawa state of Nigeria. Elixir Agriculture, 41: 5685-5688.

Kumar V, Sharma V, Sharma S C, Singh S and Sharma R K 2015. Productivity enhancement in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) as influenced by different improved production technologies. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 32(1):87-90.

Ladha J, Tirol-Padre A, Reddy C K, Cassman K G, Verma S, Powlson D S, C. van Kessel, Daniel de B. Richter, Chakraborty D and Pathak H 2016. Global nitrogen budgets in cereals: A 50-year assessment for maize, rice and wheat production systems. Nature Science Reporter, 6: 19355.

Langham D R 2007. Phenology of Sesame. In: Issues in new crops and new uses. J. Janick and A. Whipkey (Eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.

Ma D, Yu X, Ming B, Li S, Xie R and Gao J 2020. Maize nitrogen use efficiency improved due to density tolerance increase since the 1950s. Agronomy Journal, 112(3): 1537-1548.

Patel D, Mahapatra A, Ramesh K and Jena S N 2020. Evaluation of conservation tillage practices for enhancing sunflower productivity (Helianthus annuus L.) under rice fallow environment of Odisha, Journal of Oilseeds Research, 37(1): 38-43.

Procópio S O, Balbinot Junior A A, Debiasi H, Franchini J C and Panison F 2013. Cross-planting in soybean crop using an indeterminate growth habit cultivar. Revista de Ciências Agrárias, 56: 319-325.

Ramesh K, Patra A K and Biswas A K 2017. Best management practices for soybean under soybean-wheat systemto minimize the impact of climate change. Indian Journal of Fertilisers, 13: 42-55.

Ramesh K, Ratna Kumar P, Harisudan C, Bhaskar S and Reddy AV 2019. Sesame (Sesamum indicum) in the rice fallow environment - a critical appraisal, Journal of Oilseeds Research, 36(4): 203-209.

Rondanini D R, Menendez Y C, Gomez N V, Miralles D J and Botto J F 2017. Vegetative plasticity and floral branching compensate low plant density in modern spring rapeseed. Field Crop Research, 210: 104-113.

Saha S N and Bhargava S C 1982. Flowering pattern and reproductive efficiency of oilseed Sesame. Experimental Agriculture, 18(3): 293-298.

Swami P, Saxena S and Godara S K 2017.Impact of microclimatic factors on the growth stages of sesame (Sesamum indicum L) agro-ecosystem for betterment of arid zone farming in the north-western arid region of Rajasthan. Advances in Crop Science and Technology, 5(5): 308.

Wei S, Wang X, Li G, Qin Y, Jiang D and Dong S 2019. Plant density and nitrogen supply affect the grain-filling parameters of maize kernels located in different ear positions. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 180.

Yang G, Luo X, Nie Y and Zhang X 2014. Effects of plant density on yield and canopy micro environment in hybrid cotton. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 13(10): 2154-2163.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-05-30

Published

2021-04-19

How to Cite

K RAMESH, G SURESH, A AZIZ QURESHI, P RATNAKUMAR, & PRADUMAN YADAV. (2021). Plant density and nitrogen interaction on productivity of summer sesame (Sesamum indicum L.): PLANT DENSITY AND NITROGEN INTERACTION ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SUMMER SESAME. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v38i1.137013