Compatibility of Trichoderma, Bradyrhizobium sp. and Bacillus subtilis with insecticides and biopolymers
COMPATIBILITY OF TRICHODERMA, BRADYRHIZOBIUM SP. AND BACILLUS SUBTILIS
467 / 5
Authors
-
S LAKSHMI PRASANNA
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
-
R D PRASAD
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
-
K S V P CHANDRIKA
ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad-500 030, Telangana
Keywords:
Bacillus subtilis, Bradyrhizobium, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam, TrichodermaAbstract
Compatibility of three different strains of Trichoderma, Trichoderma harzianum Th4d, Th, Trichoderma asperellum TaDOR7316, two isolates of Rhizobium (Bradyrhizobium sp.) isolated from root nodules of soybean, groundnut and Bacillus subtilis with two insecticides, (thiamethoxam and imidacloprid) and two biopolymers (chitosan and cellulose) at different concentrations was tested in vitro. Bradyrhizobium isolates (soybean and groundnut) and Bacillus subtilis were found compatible with insecticides and biopolymers. All the three Trichoderma strains Trichoderma harzianum Th4d, Trichoderma harzianum Th, and Trichoderma asperellum TaDOR7316 were compatible with biopolymers. Imidacloprid showed inhibition ranging from 3.7% to 16.2% of Trichoderma @1000ppm. Thiamethoxam showed 7.5 to 10% inhibition of Trichoderma harzianum, Th4d @1000ppm. Trichoderma is compatible with Bacillus subtilis and Bradyrhizobium isolates of soybean and groundnut.
Downloads
References
Abeer Hashem, Baby Tabassum and Elsayed Fathi Abd-Allah 2019. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi Journal of B i o l o g i c a l S c i e n c e s, 2 6 ( 6 ) : 1 2 9 1 - 1 2 9 7 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004
Ali Abeer A, Abd El-Kader A E S and Ghoneem K H M 2017. Two Trichoderma species and Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agents against rhizoctonia disease and their influence on potato productivity. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 95(2): 527-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ejar.2017.147354
Andhare A P and Subramanian Babu 2017. Compatibility of Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens in growth promotion of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences, 89(2): 1027-1040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160617
Bauer A W, D M Perry and W M M Kirby 1959. Single disc antibiotic sensitivity testing ofStaphylococci. AMA Archives of Internal Medicine, 104: 208-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1959.00270080034004
Camargo, Fernando S, Isneider B, Patricio A, Diego R, Renato B, Nilton A, Jose T, Itamar D, Ivano C and Andre 2017.
Physiological Quality of soybean seeds treated with carboxymethyl cellulose and fungicide. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8: 2748-2757. 10.4236/ajps.2017.811185.
Chandrika K S V P, Prasad R D and Godbole V 2019. Development of chitosan-PEG blended films using Trichoderma: Enhancement of antimicrobial activity and seed quality. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 126: 282-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.208
Dhingra O D and Sinclair J B 1985. Basics plant pathology methods. CRC Press. Inc. Boca Raton Florida. pp. 13-44.
Glick B R 2012. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica. 1-15. doi: 10.6064 /2012 / 963401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401
Harshita A, Sinha J B, Khan S, Trivedi A, Verma and Rao S G 2018. Compatibility offungal and bacterial bio-agents and their antagonistic effect against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopersici. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(7): 2305-2316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.269
Jensen E S, Peoples M B, Boddey R M, Gresshoff P M, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves B J R 2012. Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries. Areview.Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32: 329-364. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7
Lindstrom K, Murwira M, Willems A and Altier N 2010. The biodiversity of beneficial microbe-host mutualism: the case of rhizobia. Research in Microbiology, 161: 453-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2010.05.005
Manoj K M., Tomer A and Ramji S 2014. In vitro evaluation of antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas fluorescens against fungal pathogen. Journal of Biopesticides, 7(1): 43-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57182/jbiopestic.7.1.43-46
Mastouri F, Bjorkman T and Harman G E 2010. Seed treatment with Trichoderma harzianum alleviates biotic, abiotic, and physiological stresses in germinating seeds and seedlings. Phytopathology, 100(11): 1213-1221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-10-0091
Prabhaker N, Castle S J, Naranjo S E, Toscano N C and Morse J G 2011. Compatibility of two systemic neonicotinoids, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, with various natural enemies of agricultural pests. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104(3): 773-781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1603/EC10362
Pike K S, Reed G L, Graf G T and Allison D 1993. Compatibility of imidacloprid with fungicides as a seed-treatment control of Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) and effect on germination, growth, and yield of wheat and barley. Journal of Economic Entomology, 86(2): 586-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/86.2.586
Prasad R D, Navaneetha, Tokala and Linga, Venkateswar 2016. Plant growth promotion and induced defense response in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) by Trichoderma. Journal of Biological Control, 30(1): 40-48. 10.18311 /jbc /30 /1/ 6458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18311/jbc/30/1/6458
Srijana Bastakoti,ShivaBelbase, Shrinkhala Manandhar andCharu Arjyal 2017. Trichoderma species as biocontrol agent against soil borne fungal pathogens. Nepal Journal of Biotechnology, 5(1): 39-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njb.v5i1.18492
