In vitro pollen germination and staining methods for pollen viability assessment in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
Abstract views: 91 / PDF downloads: 2
IN VITRO POLLEN GERMINATION AND STAINING METHODS IN SUNFLOWER
https://doi.org/10.56739/jor.v30i1.142716
Keywords:
Pollen germination, Pollen tube length, Pollen viabilityAbstract
Pollen viability in 207 sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes were assessed using staining technique and germination method. Pollen viability by staining technique varied from90.42 to 98.99 % and by germination method it ranged from 27.06 to 79.59 %. Six genotypes viz., GP-808, GP-6-794, GP-6-854, GP-6-906, GP-6-1477 and GP-6-83 recorded higher germination per cent ranging from 75 to 79 and pollen tube length ranging from 42.12 to 149.10 µm, indicating that both pollen germination and staining methods can be employed to assess the viability in sunflower to identify highly competitive pollen genotypes.
Downloads
References
Gilbert J and Punter D 1991. Germination of pollen of the dwarf mistletoe Arceuthobium americanum. Canadian Journal of Botany, 69: 685-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b91-092
Heslop-Harrison J and Heslop-Harrison Y 1992. Germination of monocolpate angiosperm pollen: effects of inhibitory factors and the Ca -channel blocker, Nifedipine. Annals of Botany, 69: 395- 403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088360
Keshavamurthy M N, Nanja Reddy Y A and Virupakshappa K. 1994. Development of suitable germination medium for trinucleate pollen grains: An illustration with sunflower. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 11(2): 304-307.
Panse V G and Sukhatme P V 1985. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
Rigamoto R R and Tyagi A P 2002. Pollen fertility statusin coastal plant species of Rotuma Island. South Pacific Journal of Natural Science, 20:30-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/SP02007
Rodriguez de la Paz J, Gomez Martinez M and Reyes Valdes M. H 2007. Meiotic analysis of a cross between cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. var. macrocarpus) and wild sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. ssp. texanus Heiser). Acta Botanica Mexicana, 80: 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm80.2007.1043
Shanna E Carney, Keith A Gardner and Loren H 2000, Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population sunflower (Helianthus).Evolution, 54(2): 462-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00049.x
Shanker goud I and Giriraj K 1999. Pollen competition at gametophytic and sporophytic phases in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia, 22: 57-62.
Shivanna K R , Linskens H F and Cresti M 1976. Pollen viability and pollen vigour. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 81: 38-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226109
Terzic Sreten Jovanka Atlagic and Dejana Pankovic 2006. Characterization of interspecific hybrids between wild Helianthus annuus L. populations and cultivated sunflower. Genetika, 38(2): 159-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR0602159T
Todorova M , Nenova N and Encheva J 2004. Study on in vitro pollen germination of sunflower (Helianthus annuusL.) before and after gamma-irradiation. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(1): 65-70.
Vischi M, Nonino F and Olivieri A M 2002. AFLP markersfor the study of introgression between wild sunflower species (H. argophyllus and H. debilisssp. cucumerifolius) and in relation with H. annuus. Helia, 25: 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/HEL0236047V