Selection of elite genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) through AMMI, GGE biplot and MTSI
Selection of elite genotypes of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) through AMMI, GGE biplot and MTSI
210 / 5
Authors
-
SURENDRA KUMAR
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
RAHUL BHARDWAJ
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
ARCHNA RAI
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
VIKAS KHANDELWAL
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
RUMIT PATEL
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
RAMESH
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
S J JHAMBHULKAR
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
-
MANISH KUMAR
College of Agriculture, Jodhpur, Agricultural University, Jodhpur - 342 304
Keywords:
AMMI, GGE biplot, IPCA, MTSI, Mustard, StabilityAbstract
Forty-five Indian mustard genotypes were evaluated under four environments. Significant G × E interaction leads to stability analysis using AMMI, GGE biplot and MTSI. GGE biplot identified G43 as a vertex genotype in E1 and E2; G41 in E3 and E4 for seed yield and G16 in E1 and E2; G11 in E3 and G13 in E4 for oil content. AEC illustrated that G27 and G30 were most stable for seed yield and G14 for oil content. Environment, E1 and E4 were more discriminating whereas E1 and E3 were more representative for seed yield and oil content, respectively. MTSI identified promising genotype G42, G43, G45, G40, G41 and G44. According to AMMI, E1 and E2 were potential whereas E3 and E4 were poor environment. Genotypes G39, G2, G18 and G6 for seed yield whereas G45 and G9 for oil content were broadly adapted to all environments.
Downloads
References
Gauch H G, Piepho H P and Annicchiarico P 2008. Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: Further considerations. Crop Sci., 48: 866–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.09.0513
Yan W, Kang M S, Ma B, Woods S and Cornelius P L 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-byenvironment data. Crop Sci., 47(2): 643–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374
Singh V and Bhajan C R 2016. Evaluation of Indian mustard genotypes to heat stress in irrigated environment- seed yield stability and physiological model. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 19(5): 333-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-016-0142-0
Olivoto T, Lúcio A D, da Silva J A, Marchioro V S, de Souza V Q, and Jost E 2019a. Mean performance and stability in multi‐environment trials I: Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal, 111(6): 2949-2960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0220
