Exploitation of the phenotypic diversity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for deficit soil moisture stress tolerance
Exploitation of the phenotypic diversity of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for deficit soil moisture stress tolerance
162 / 1
Keywords:
Deficit soil moisture, Physiological traits, Safflower, Yield and soil typeAbstract
Safflower is an annual oilseed crop grown throughout the semi-arid regions under residual soil moisture. Under the present climatic scenarios, scarcity of water is frequent which is limiting crop yields. A series of field experiments were carried out during post rainy season of 2020-21 and 2021-22 to evaluate the genotype responses to terminal deficit soil moisture stress (DS). The phenotypic data generated in both the seasons revealed that, the huge genotypic difference among the genotypes were conferring tolerance to DS. The PCA analysis revealed that certain morpho-physiological traits viz., plant height, SPAD chlorophyll meter reading, relative water content, and days to 50% flowering accounted for maximum variation under deficit and residual soil moisture conditions.
Downloads
References
Hussain F, Rafiq M, Ghias M Qamar R Razzaq MK, Hameed A, Habib S and. Mustafa HSB 2017. Genetic diversity for seed yield and its components using principal component and cluster analysis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Life Sci. J., 14, 71-78.
Mohammadi M, Ghassemi-Golezani K, Zehtab-Salmasi S, Nasrollahzade S. 2016.Assessment of some physiological traits in spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars under water stress. International Journal of Life Science. 10(1), 58-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14512
Singh AL, Nakar RN, Chakraborty K, Kalariya KA 2014. Physiological efficiencies in mini-core peanut germplasm accessions during summer season. Photosynthetica. 52 (4), 627–635. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-014-0072-3
Yau SK 2007. Winter versus spring sowing of rain-fed safflower in a semi-arid, high-elevation Mediterranean environment. European Journal of Agronomy. 26 (3), 249-256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.10.004