Development of CRISPR-Cas12a-based fluorescent assay for rapid detection of peanut mottle virus in quarantine
CRISPR-CAS12A-BASED FLUORESCENT ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF PEANUT MOTTLE VIRUS
79 / 2
Keywords:
On-site detection, Pathogen, Peanut mottle virus, RT-PCR, RT-RPAAbstract
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is susceptible to infection by more than 31 viruses, with seed-borne viruses posing a major challenge to international trade and germplasm exchange. Among these, peanut mottle virus (PeMoV), a positive-sense single-stranded RNA virus of the genus Potyvirus, is one of the most economically significant pathogens, transmitted both through seeds and by aphids in a non-persistent manner. Therefore, an accurate and sensitive detection method for PeMoV is urgently required in quarantine samples. In this study, we developed a CRISPR/Cas12a-based visual detection system targeting the PeMoV coat protein gene combined with reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-PRA). The whole process can be completed within 60 to 90 min with high sensitivity. This system detected cDNAs diluted up to 10-8 when 100 ng of total RNA was used for reverse transcription. The Cas12a/crRNA complex specifically recognized and cleaved the target double-stranded DNA, subsequently degrading single-stranded DNA probes to generate fluorescent signals. The resulting green fluorescence under blue light (440-460 nm) was visible to the naked eye. The optimisation of gRNA: CAS12a concentration, ss-DNA reporter concentration, detection time and reaction temperature was performed to standardise the most efficient assay condition. This work represents the first report of an RPA-assisted CRISPR/Cas12a fluorescent assay for PeMoV detection, providing a rapid diagnostic tool to support germplasm health monitoring and quarantine practices.
Downloads
References
Adams DB and Kuhn CW 1977. Seed transmission of peanut mottle virus in peanuts. Phytopathology, 67(9): 1126-1129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-67-1126
Alon DM, Hak H, Bornstein M, Pines G and Spiegelman Z 2021. Differential Detection of the Tobamoviruses Tomato Mosaic Virus (ToMV) and Tomato Brown Rugose Fruit Virus (ToBRFV) Using CRISPR-Cas12a. Plants, 10(6): 1256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10061256
Aman R, Mahas A and Marsic T 2020. Efficient, rapid, and sensitive detection of plant RNA viruses with one-pot RT-RPA-CRISPR/ Cas12a assay. Frontiersin Microbiology, 11: 610872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.610872
Anbazhagan P, Parameswari B, Anitha K, Chaitra GV, Bhaskar B, Rajashree A, Mangrauthia SK, Faisal Yousuf, Celia Chalam V and Singh GP 2024. Advances in plant pathogen detection: integrating recombinase polymerase amplification with CRISPR/Cas systems. 3 Biotech, 14: 214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-024-04055-x
Anusha CH, Rajashree A, Parameswari B, Vijay Mahanthesh, Venkataravanappa V, Pranusha P, Vinod Kumar Sharma, Mangrauthia SK, Kavi Sidharthan V, Vidya Sagar B, Bhaskar B, Saravanan L and Celia Chalam V 2025. A simplified crude sap-based detection of cucumber mosaic virus in chilli germplasm through reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RT-RPA). 3 Biotech, 15: 351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-025-04459-3
Behncken GM 1970. The occurrence of peanut mottle virus in Queensland. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research, 21(3): 465-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9700465
Bock KR 1973. Peanut mottle virus in East Africa. Annals of Applied Biology, 74(2): 171-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb07736.x
Chaitra GV, Parameswari B, Sakthivel K, Rakesh Reddy C, Mangrauthia SK, Kavi Siddarthan V, Rajashree A, Anitha K, Bhaskar B, Saravanan L, Dudhe MY, Chowdappa A and Celia Chalam V 2025. A reverse transcription-recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) assay for rapid and sensitive detection of tobacco streak virus causing sunflower necrosis disease. 3 Biotech, 15: 262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-025-04419-x
Chen HM, Zhou Y, Wang XF, Zhou CY, Yang XY and Zhong LI 2016. Detection of citrus yellow vein clearing virus based on a real-time RT-PCR approach. Acta Horticulturae, 43(1): 168.
Dey KK, Hassell L, Li C, Elliott M and Sun X 2018. First report of peanut mottle virus in forage peanut (Arachis pintoi) in the United States. Plant Health Progress, 19(1): 13-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-12-17-0076-BR
Elahinia SA, Shahraeen N, Alipour HRM, Nicknejad M and Pedramfar H 2008. Identification and determination of some properties of peanut mottle virus using biological and serological methods in Guilan Province. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1(10): 11-21.
Jiao J, Kong K, Han J, Song S, Bai T, Song C, Wang M, Yan Z, Zhang H, Zhang R, Feng J and Zheng X 2021. Field detection of multiple RNA viruses/viroids in apple using a CRISPR/Cas12a-based visual assay. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 19(2): 394-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13474
Kuhn CW 1965. Symptomatology, host range, and effect on yield of a seed-transmitted peanut virus. Phytopathology, 55(1): 880-884.
Lei R, Li Y and Li L 2022. A CRISPR/Cas12a-based portable platform for rapid detection of Leptosphaeria maculans in Brassica crops. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13: 976510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.976510
Marqués MC, Sánchez-Vicente J, Ruiz R, Montagud-Martínez R, Márquez-Costa R, Gómez G, Carbonell A, Daròs JA and Rodrigo G 2022. Diagnostics of infections produced by the plant viruses TMV, TEV, and PVX with CRISPR-Cas12 and CRISPR-cas13. ACS Synthetic Biology Journal, 11(7): 2384-2393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00090
Megha SS, Usha kiran B and Dinesh Kumar V 2024. Enhancing efficiency and precision in CRISPR genome editing for plants using computational tools. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 41(3&4): 89-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56739/baqa6j43
Parameswari B, Anbazhagan P, Rajashree A, Chaitra GV, Kavi Sidharthan, Mangrauthia SK, Faisal Yousuf, Anitha K, Prasanthi Y, Bhaskar B, Celia Chalam V and Singh GP. 2025. Development of reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay for rapid diagnostics of Peanut mottle virus. Physiological and Molecular Biology of Plants, 31: 131-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-024-01545-3
Rao RDVJ, Ragunathan V and Joshi NC 1979. Interception of peanut mottle virus. Indian Journal of Plant Protection, 7(1):59-63
Reddy DVR, Iizuka N, Ghanekar AM, Murthy VK, Kuhn CW, Gibbons RW and Chohan SJ 1978. The occurrence of peanut mottle virus in India. Plant Disease Reports, 62(11): 978-982.
Sreenivasulu P, Reddy CV, Ramesh B and Kumar L 2008. Virus diseases of groundnut, in: G.P. Rao, R.J. Holguin-Peña and L. Kumar (Eds.), Characterization, Diagnosis and Management of Plant Viruses; Industrial Crops, Studium Press LLC., Houston, TX, USA, pp: 47-98.
Soumya K, Yogita M, Prasanthi Y, Anitha K, Kishor PB, Jain RK and Mandal B 2014. Molecular characterization of Indian isolate of peanut mottle virus and immune diagnosis using bacterial expressed core capsid protein. Virus Disease, 25(3): 331-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-014-0210-3