Castor centric two-tier intercropping under limited irrigation
CASTOR CENTRIC TWO-TIER INTERCROPPING UNDER LIMITED IRRIGATION
37 / 1
Keywords:
Castor, Correlation analysis, Economic returns, Ginger intercropping, PCA, Water use efficiency, YTP-1Abstract
A field study evaluated the agronomic, economic and water-use efficiency traits of two castor genotypes (ICH-66 and YTP-1) intercropped with ginger under semi-arid conditions at Agricultural Research Station, Ananthapuramu. YTP-1 demonstrated superior performance, with significantly higher plant height (124.6-125.0 cm), spike length (126-131 cm), capsule number (up to 131) and seed yield (1819-2001 kg/ha) compared to ICH-66. The castor equivalent yield (CEY) for YTP-1 peaked at 3124 kg/ha, reflecting enhanced system productivity. Economic analysis revealed higher gross (`154,620-156,190/ha) and net returns (`112,620-114,190/ha) for YTP-1, with a benefit-cost ratio exceeding 3.5. Despite uniform water application (892 ha-mm), YTP-1 exhibited superior rain water use efficiency (RWUE: 3.367-3.502 kg/ha-mm), underscoring its adaptability to water-limited environments. Multivariate analysis (PCA and correlation) confirmed YTP-1's dominance in yield-related traits and economic viability. The study advocates YTP-1 as a promising genotype for castor-ginger intercropping in semi-arid regions, combining high productivity, profitability, and resource-use efficiency
Downloads
References
Gajera HP, Patel VA and Patel KA 2016. Association and path coefficient analysis in castor (Ricinus communis L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(53): 2932-2934.
Gangadhar K, Yadav JS and Yadav AK 2023. Performance of castor-based intercropping in semi-arid zone of Haryana. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 40(4): 207-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56739/3rwa1y69
ICAR-DOR (Indian Council of Agricultural Research - Directorate of Oilseeds Research). (2013). Annual Report 2012-13. Hyderabad: ICAR-DOR.
Jolliffe IT and Cadima J 2016. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science s, 374(2065): 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202
Lakshmamma P, Manjunatha T, Prayaga L, Lavanya C, Senthilvel S and Alivelu K 2024. Evaluation of castor parental lines for drought stress tolerance. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 41(2): 143-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56739/260fws47
Passioura JB 2006. Increasing crop productivity when water is scarce - from breeding to field management. Agricultural Water Management, 80(1-3): 176-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.012
Patel AI, Chaudhari SD and Patel RN 2019. Assessment of castor genotypes under intercropping systems for yield and economics. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 7(3): 3346-3349.
ReddyBM and Padmaja PG 2000. Agroforestry and intercropping studies with ginger. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 45(4): 763-767.
Sailaja B, Kiran B and Sudhakar B 2018. Assessment of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in castor (Ricinus communis L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(1): 2939-2946. https://doi.org/ 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.701.351.
Singh AK, Singh RP and Lal M 2015. Intercropping systems in castor for sustainable productivity. Journal of Oilseeds Research, 32(Special Issue): 221-224.