Studies on association of coefficient of coancestry with progeny performance in sugarcane
349 / 163
Authors
-
C Mahadevaiah
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore
-
G Hemaprabha
-
Ravinder Kumar
-
C Appunu
ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore
-
V Sreenivasa
-
H.K. Mahadevaswamy
-
A Anna Durai
-
Adhini S Pazhani
Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, St Lucia QLD 4069, Australia
Abstract
The utilization of superior parental lines and identification of superior families enhance the genetic gain in sugarcane. To identify the superior parental lines and superior progenies, 1889 progenies derived from twenty crosses involving genetically diverse historical parents were evaluated for juice quality and yield attributing traits.The historical parental lines were selected based on coefficient of coancestry from the tropical and subtropical parents maintained at National Hybridization Garden. Based on progeny performance, families of Co 99006 × CoSe 92423 and Co 86032 × 85R186 were found superior for number of millable canes, , Co 86032 × 85R186 and Co 8371 × CoT 8201 for cane thickness and CoSe 95422 × Co 775 and Co 8371 × CoV 92102 for sucrose content. Parental lines such as Co 86002, Co 99006 and CoLk 98184, Co 775, 85R186 and BO 130 were identified for HR Brix; Co 419 and Co 89010, CoS 510, CoV 92102 and CoSe 92423 for cane thickness; and CoLk 94184, BO 91 and BO 32 for number of millable canes. The estimates of coefficient of coancestry was negatively correlated with HR Brix and cane thickness suggesting that parental cross combination with lesser value of coefficient of coancestry or inbreeding coefficient resulted in produce the heterotic progenies. This study based on the historic parental lines selected based on the coefficient of coancestry and inference limited to only to this experimental material. The evaluation of families derived from the population parental cross combination and parental lines in replication family block design permits the estimation of BLUP based breeding values and helpful in selection of superior parental lines and superior progenies.
References
Alarmelu S. Hemaprabha G. NagarajanR. Shanthi RM. 2010.Combining ability for yield and quality in Sugarcane. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 1(4):742-746.
Azeredo AAC de. L.L. Bhering LL. Brasileiro BP. Cruz CD. Barbosa MHP. 2015. Selection in sugarcane based on inbreeding depression. Genetics and Molecular Research. 15 (2): gmr.15027965.
Bremer G. 1962.Problems in breeding and cytology of sugarcane. Euphytica11: 65-80.
Canilha L.Chandel AK.Milessi TSS dos.Antunes FAF. Freitas WLC. Felipe MGA. Silva SS. 2012. Bioconversion of Sugarcane Biomass into Ethanol:An Overview about Composition, PretreatmentMethods, Detoxification of Hydrolysates, Enzymatic Saccharification,and Ethanol Fermentation. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. Article ID 989572.doi:10.1155/2012/989572.
Choo TM, Reinbergs E. 1982. Analysis of skewness and kurtosis for detecting gene interaction in a double haploid population. Crop Science., 22: 231-235.
Crow JF. Kimura M. 1970. In introduction to population genetics theory.Harper and Row Publishers Inc. pp.68.
Dotaniya ML. Datta SC. Biswas DR. Dotaniya CK. Meena BL. Rajendiran S. Regar KL. Lata M. 2016. Use of sugarcane industrial by-products for improving sugarcaneproductivity and soil health. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture. 5:185-194.DOI 10.1007/s40093-016-0132-8.
Falconer DS. 1960. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group Ltd., London. pp-87-89. FAOSTAT, 2020.FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/ faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize.
Ferreira FM. Barbosa MHPB. de Castro RDC. Peternelli LA. Cruz CD. 2005. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology. 5:174-182 Fisher FA, Immer FR and Tedin O, 1932.The genetical interpretation of statistics of the third degree in the study of quantitative inheritance. Genetics ., 17: 107-124.
Henderson CR. 1984.Applications of linear models in animal breeding.University of Guelph, Guelph.
ICAR, 2015, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute vision document, 2050. ICAR, New Delhi
Jackson P. McRae TA. 2001. Selection of Sugarcane Clones in Small Plots:Effects of Plot Size and Selection Criteria. Crop Science. 41:315–322. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.412315x.
Kelker, DKand Kelker, H, 1986.The effect of skewness on selection in a plant breeding program. Euphytica,35: 303-309.
Mbuma NM. Zhou MM. van der Merwe R. 2020. Estimating breeding values of genotypes for sugarcane yield using data from unselected progeny populations. Euphytica (2020) 216:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2540-0.
Miller JD. James NI. Lyrene PM. 1978. Selection Indices in Sugarcane. Crop Science. 18: 369-372. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800030004x.
Miller JD. 1977. Combining Ability and Yield Component Analyses in a Five-Parent Diallel Cross in Sugarcane. Crop Science, 17:545-547. ttps://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700040016x.
Nair NV. 2008. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore: A Perspective. Sugar Tech10(4) : 285-292.
Pooni H S, Jinks JL, and Cornish MA, 1977. The causes and consequences of nonnormality in pretending the properties of recombinant inbred lines. Heredity, 38: 329-338.
Premachandran MN, Prathima PT, Lekshmi M, 2011.Sugarcane and polyploidy - A review. Journal of Sugarcane Research1(2): 1-15
Raghavan TS, 1952.Sugarcane × Bamboo Hybrids. Nature 170, 329 – 330. Robson DS, 1956. Application of K4 statistics to genetic variance component analysis.,Biometrics,12: 433-444.
Roy D. 2000.Plant Breeding: Analysis and exploitation of variation.Narosa Publication house, New Delhi.pp302.
Singh S. Bhatnagar A. Singh MM. Singh A. 2018. Validation of elite sugarcane varieties for quality jaggeryproduction in subtropical India. Sugar Tech. 21: 682–685https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0647-6.
Snape JW, and Riggs TJ. 1975. Genetical consequences of single seed descent in the breeding of self-pollinating crops. Heredity 35, 211-219.
Sreenivasan T.V, Ahloowalia, BS. and Heinz, DJ. 1987. Cytogenetics.In: Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Edited by D.J. Heinz. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. pp.211-253.
Wu KK, Heinz DJ, Meyer HK, Ladd SL. 1980. Combining ability and parental evaluation in five selected clonesof sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids). Theoritical Applied Genetics. 56: 241-244. DOI:10.1007/BF00282565.
Xu Y. 2010.Molecular Plant Breeding, CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
Zhou MM.Lichakane ML. 2012. Family selection gains for quality traits among South African sugarcane breeding populations. South African Journal of Plant and Soil. 29: 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2012.743606.CAB International, Wallingford,UK.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
It is mandatory on the part of the corresponding author to furnish the article declaration form at the time of submission of the manuscript or after acceptance.
Authors who publish with JSR agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant JSR right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Society for Sugarcane Research and Development
How to Cite
