Mechanization of sugarcane cultivation in Fiji – status and way forward

Rahul Ravneel Prasad; Vinal Vishal Chand; Shivneel Krishneel Narayan; Ashneil Nadan

doi:10.37580/JSR.2021.2.11.115-129

Authors

Rahul Ravneel Prasad University of the South Pacific
Vinal Vishal Chand University of the South Pacific
Shivneel Krishneel Narayan University of Fiji
Ashneil Nadan University of the South Pacific

https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2021.2.11.115-129

Keywords:

Mechanisation; Sugarcane production; Fiji Islands; Labour shortage

Abstract

Sugarcane is Fiji’s most important commercial crop, with the sugar industry being the largest enterprise in the country. The industry employs close to 48,000 individuals, with a quarter of the country’s population depending directly and indirectly on the industry for their livelihoods, despite the subsiding sugar industry and declining yields observed in the past two decades. Therefore, to increase yield per hectare and solve the labour storage problem, there has been an immense focus on the mechanization of the sugar industry. There is very little documentation regarding the mechanization of sugarcane farming in Fiji, hence, the present study was undertaken to determine the status of farm mechanization in sugarcane production, using the Nadogo district of Vanua Levu, Fiji, as a case study site. The study revealed that to increase the productivity of the farm and reduce the cost of cultivation, farmers in the Nadogo district were attempting to adopt various mechanisation strategies related to land preparation, planting of sugarcane crops, intercultural operations, weedicide application, harvesting, ratoon management, and transportation of the harvests. In the study, we also focus on the advantages and disadvantages related to the mechanization of the sugarcane farms. The study revealed advantages such as saving time and labour for the growers, minimizing drudgery, improving work quality, lowering operating costs, and ensuring optimal resource utilization related to farm mechanization. The disadvantages were high maintenance costs due to wear and tear, the high cost of fuel to use some of the machinery, increased carbon footprints, and pollution. Most of these machines were also causing soil compaction during rainy seasons and delaying the cultivation process when machine breakdowns occurred and parts were not available.

Author Biographies

Rahul Ravneel Prasad, University of the South Pacific

Tutor
Vinal Vishal Chand, University of the South Pacific

University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji Islands
Shivneel Krishneel Narayan, University of Fiji

University of Fiji, Suva, Fiji Islands
Ashneil Nadan, University of the South Pacific

University of the South Pacific, Laucala Campus, Suva, Fiji Islands

References

[SRIF] Annual report of Sugar Research Institute of Fiji. 2015. Statistics of sugarcane cultivation in Fiji. 15-25.

Appau A, Drope J, Witoelar F, Chavez JJ, Lencucha R. 2019. Why do farmers grow tobacco? A qualitative exploration of farmer’s perspectives in Indonesia and Philippines. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2330.

Bright MP, Terrence KN, Ngavaite C. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 on agricultural extension and food supply in Zimbabwe. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 7(1), 1918428.

Bunyatta DK, Mureithi JG. 2010. Farmer field school as an effective approach in empowerment of gender participation, decision making and diffusion of soil and crop management technologies among small scale farmers trans-nzoia district, Kenya.

Bunyatta DK, Mureithi JG, Onyango CA, Ngesa FU. 2006. Farmer field school effectiveness for soil and crop management technologies in Kenya. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 13(3), 47-63.

Dharmawardene MWN. 2006. Trends in farm mechanization by sugarcane small land holders in Sri Lanka. Sugar Tech 8(1), 16- 22.

Esteban DAA, Souza ZM, Tormena CA, Lovera LH, Souza, LE, Oliveira IN, Paula RN. 2019. Soil compaction, root system and productivity of sugarcane under different row spacing and controlled traffic at harvest. Soil and Tillage Research, 187, 60-71.

Grange I, Prammanee P, Prasertsak P. 2005. Comparative analysis of different tillage systems used in sugarcane (Thailand). Australian farm business management journal, 2(1), 46-50.

Gunathilake DMC, Prasad A, Singh IR. 2020. Present status of herbicide and inorganic fertilizer use for sugarcane farming in Fiji Islands. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 54(2), 222-226.

Hone P, Haszler H, Tuicakau A. 2006. Estimating the size of the Fiji Islands agricultural sector. School of accounting, economics and finance, Deakin University.

Kishore N, Gayathri D, Venkatesh J, Rajeswari V, Sangeeta B, Chandrika A. 2017. Present mechanization status in sugarcane–a review. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, ISSN, 0975-3710.

Kumar A, Patel A, Kadam DM, Shrivastava AK, Pandey MK, Dubey RK, Khandelwal NK. 2018. Status of farm Mechanization for Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane) in Narsinghpur, (MP), India. International Journal of Applied Research, 4(10), 101-109.

Kumar A, Patel A, Shrivastava AK, Khandelwal NK. 2018. Requirement of energy for mechanized cultivation of sugarcane in Narsinghpur, (MP), India. Technology, 2, 1.

Martin GB, Maestre VJF, Almagro M, Boix FC, Martínez MM. 2020. Carbon emissions and economic assessment of farm operations under different tillage practices in organic rainfed almond orchards in semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 261, 108978.

Narayan PK, Prasad BC. 2006. The economic importance of the sugar industry for Fiji. In computable general equilibrium approaches in urban and regional policy studies (pp. 189-203).

Narimoto LR, Camarotto JA, Costaalves FJ. 2015. The operation of mechanical sugarcane harvesters and the competence of operators: An ergonomic approach. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(15), 1832-1839.

Prasad RR, Dean MRU, Alungo B, Chand VV. 2021. Prevalence and incidence of Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Brown Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Cercospora heningsii in Macuata Province, Vanua Levu, Fiji. Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 13, No. 8, 91-97.

Sharma MP, Singh AK, Singh J. 2007. Mechanization of sugarcane farming in India: relevant issues. Invited lead paper presented in Suvarna Karnataka All India Seminar on ‘‘Mechanized cultivation of sugarcane & Safety-Quality Management in Sugar Industry’’, The Institution of Engineers (India), Karnataka State Centre, Bangalore on March 10–11.

Singh, A. 2020. Benefits of crop diversification in Fiji’s sugarcane farming. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 7(1), 65-80.

Singh J, Singh AK, Sharma MP, Singh PR, Srivastava AC. 2011. Mechanization of sugarcane cultivation in India. Sugar Tech, 13(4), 310-314.

Yadav RNS, Chaudhuri D. 2000. Overview of sugarcane mechanization and role of NATP for development and popularization of sugarcane machinery. In National Seminar- cum-Workshop on Mechanization of Sugarcane Production in India, CIAE (Vol. 16, pp. 1-12).

Yadav RNS, Sharma MP, Kamthe SD, Tajuddin A, Yadav S, Tejra RK. 2002. Performance evaluation of sugarcane chopper harvester. Sugar Tech, 4(3), 117-122.

Yinggang O, Wegener M, Dantong Y, Qingting L, Dingke Z, Meimei W, Haochun L. 2013. Mechanization technology: The key to sugarcane production in China. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 6(1), 1-27.