Genotypic interrelationships for flowering traits in sugarcane genotypes treated by Gibberellic acid under natural conditions


165 / 105

Authors

  • Farrag F. B. Abu-Ellail Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt
  • E.S.R. Salem Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
  • El-Sheikh A.M. Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt

https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2023.1.13.28-45

Keywords:

Genotypic correlation; Sugarcane genotypes; Gibberellic acid; Flowering intensity.

Abstract

The low flowering intensity of some sugarcane germplasm decreases seed yield. Flowering ability and intensity are desired traits for a successful sugarcane breeding program. The goal of the study  was to evaluate the effects of  various foliar gibberellic acid (GA3) concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg l⁻¹) on 20 sugarcane  genotypes to improve their flowering ability and intensity under natural conditions at El-Sabahia Research Station (31o  12 54″ N and 29o  58' 23″ E),  Alexandria, Egypt, over the plant and ratoon cane crops grown in the 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 seasons. The results revealed that increasing GA3 concentrations up to 100 mg/l improved the flowering percentage during the various flowering stages of the 20 sugarcane genotypes. Sugarcane genotypes, namely MEX2001-80, Co1129, and CP63-49, outperformed the others during the flowering stages. The interactions between sugarcane genotypes and GA3  concentrations had a significant impact on flowering percentage. According to cluster analysis, the longest full emergence flowering period was 142.24 days, whereas the shortest period was 0.0 days. It was discovered that the Mex 2001–80 genotype's superiority in longevity was mostly due to its superiority in the emergence stage. The GT biplot's polygon view was used to identify the genotypes that showed good flowering responses for one or more GA3  concentrations. According to the study, the responsive sugarcane genotypes may be treated with 100 mg/l of GA3 to induce floral primordia, which will speed up and intensify flowering. Selection should concentrate on tip emergence stage and full emergence stage to increase flowering percentage, according to genotypic correlation.  Finding the best sugarcane genotypes in natural settings is crucial, as evidenced by the necessity for additional research using higher 
concentrations of GA  to evaluate all sugarcane germplasms for flowering ability and intensity.

Author Biographies

  • Farrag F. B. Abu-Ellail, Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

    Breeding & Genetic Dept., Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

  • E.S.R. Salem, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

    Physiology and Chemistry Dept., Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt

  • El-Sheikh A.M., Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt

    Breeding & Genetics Dept., Sugar Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

References

Abu-Ellail FFB, Mohamed BD. 2020. Effects of photo initiation treatments on flowering, pollen viability and seed germinability of four sugarcane clones. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 9 (2): 138-149.

Abu-Ellail FFB. 2015. Breeding for yield and quality traits in sugarcane. Ph. D Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Cairo Univ., Egypt.

Abu-Ellail FFB, McCord PH. 2019. Temperature and relative humidity effects on sugarcane flowering ability and pollen viability under natural and semi-natural conditions. Sugar Tech., 21(1):83-92.

Ahmed AZ, Khaled KA. 2009. Detection of genetic similarity of sugarcane genotypes. Electronic Journal of Gene Conserve 31 (1): 686-697

Ahmed MF, Siddique M, Kama N, Ahmad N.2019. Sugarcane flowering at sugarcane breeding substation (SBSS), Murree. Haya: The Saudi Journal of Life Sciences, 4(6): 206-212.

Ashraf M, Karim F, Rasul E. 2002. Interactive effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) and salt stress on growth, ion accumulation and photosynthetic capacity of two spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant Growth Regulation, 36(1): 49-59.

Batlang U, Emongor, VE, Pule-Meulenburg F. 2006. Effect of benzyladenine plus gibberellins and gibberellic acid on yield and yield components of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv.'tempo'). Journal of Agronomy, 5(3): 418-423.

Bendigeri AV, Hapse DG, Shaikh AA, Tiwari US. 1986 . Efficacy of different growth regulators and hormones on sugarcane. Proceeding. Thirty Sixth Ann. Convention. D.S.T.A. Pune, pp 289-296.

Benny JC, Devi S, Fatmi U, Jose DA. 2017. Effect of plant growth regulators, Gibberellic acid (GA3) and Naphthalene Acetic Acid (NAA) on growth and yield of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) under naturally ventilated polyhouse. Plant Archives, 17(2):803-812.

Buban T. 2000. The use of benzyl adenine in orchard fruit growing: A mini review. Plant Growth Regulation, 32, 381-390.

Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL. (Eds.). 2015. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. John wiley & sons.

Bora KK, Bohra SP.1989. Effect of ethephon on growth and yield of Glycine max L. Comp. Physiological Ecology. 14: 74-77.

Cobas DB, Dathe W, Gonzalea M. 1984. The influence of gibberellic acid on the development of young sugarcane plants. Sugarcane Research Institute, Cuba; Agricultural Sciences 18: 59-69.

Coleman RE. 1962. Control of flowering and the use of pollen storage as techniques in a sugarcane breeding programme. In Proceedings International Society Sugarcane Technologists, 11, 533-540.

Cordeiro GM, Yong-Bao P, Robert JH .2003. Sugarcane microsatellites for the assessment of genetic diversity in sugarcane germplasm. Plant Science 165(1): 181–189.

Correa NS, Perez-Antich E, Antoni H. 1972. A preliminary study of gibberellin-type substances in sugarcane apices and their relationship to photoperiodic induction. Revista Industrial y Agricola. De Tucuman. 49(1): 1-11.

Daniels J, Roach BT, Heinz DJ. 1987. Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 313-342.

El-Maghraby SS, El-Banna MN, El-Kady MS .2006. Effects of GA3 concentration on flowering of some sugarcane varieties. Conference: Proc. of Int. Conf. Meeting the Challenges of Sugar Crops and Integrated Industries in Developing Countries, Al Arish, Egypt, PP S-79.

Emami H, Saeidnia M, Hatamzadeh A, Bakhshi D, Ghorbani E. 2011. The Effect of gibberellic acid and benzyl adenine on growth and flowering of Lily (Lilium longiflorum). Advances in Environmental Biology 5(7):1606-1611.

Everitt BS .1993. Cluster analysis, 3rd edn. Edward Arnold, London Gad MM, Abdul-Hafeez EY, Ibrahim OHM. 2016. Foliar application of salicylic acid and gibberellic acid enhances growth and flowering of Ixora coccinea L. plants. International Journal of Plant Production, 7(1): 85-91.

Hedden P, Thomas SG. 2012. Gibberellin biosynthesis and its regulation. Biochemical Journal, 444(1), 11-25.

Hodges T. 1991. Temperature and water stress effects on phenology. In: Hodges, T., ed. Predicting crop phenology. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 7-13.

Ishaq MN, Olaoye G.2014. Effect of climate variability on sugarcane breeding in Nigeria. Nigerian Agricultural Journal, 45(1):37-45.

Julien MHR. 1973. Physiology of flowering in Saccharum: I. Daylength Control of Floral Initiation and Development in S. Spontaneum L. Journal of Experimental Botany, 24(3):549-557.

Julien MHR .1969. Investigation on the physiology of flowering. Republic of Mauritius Sugar Industry Research Institute 18: 45-53.

Kang MS. 1994. Applied quantitative genetics. Kang Publ. Baton Rouge, LA, USA. pp157.

Kang MS, Miller JD, Tai PYP. 1983.Gentic and phenotypic path analysis and heritability in sugarcane. Crop Science, 23: 643-651.

Kanwar K, Kanwar RS. 1986. Effect of gibberellic acid on sugarcane genotypes. Indian Sugar. 36(2):65-66.

LaBorde C, Kimbeng C, Gravois K, Bischoff K. 2014. Temperature effects on sugarcane t assel production under artificial photoperiod regimes. Journal of American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 34, 33-43.

Li Y, Solomon S. 2003. Ethephon: a versatile growth regulator for sugar cane industry. Sugar Tech, 5(4):213-223.

Mesejo C, Yuste R, Reig C, Martínez-Fuentes A, Iglesias DJ, Muñoz-Fambuena N, Agustí M. 2016. Gibberellin reactivates and maintains ovary-wall cell 80 division causing fruit set in parthenocarpic Citrus species. Plant Science, 247, 13-24.

Miceli A, Moncada A, Sabatino L, Vetrano F. 2019. Effect of gibberellic acid on growth, yield, and quality of leaf lettuce and rocket grown in a floating system. Agronomy, 9(7):382.

Milligan SB, Gravois KA, Bischoff KP, Martin FA. 1990. Crop effect on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Science, 30: 927-931.

Mohammad, F.H., S. Anwar and Z. Hussain 2006. Economics of sugarcane production in P a k i s t a n : A Price Risk Analysis , International Research Journal of Finance and Economics.

Moore PH, Pharis RP, Yoshika M.1986. Gibberellins in apical shoot merstems of flowering and vegetative sugarcane. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 5(2): 101-109.

Nguyen CT, Dang LH, Nguyen DT, Tran KP, Giang BL, Tran NQ .2019. Effect of GA3 and Gly plant growth regulators on productivity and sugar content of sugarcane. Agriculture, 9(7):136.

Patel D, Chaudhary MP. 2003. Influence of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane under south Gujarat. R a n g a s w a m y R . A Te x t b o o k o f Agricultural Statistics. 496 pp.

Patel RG, Mankad AU. 2014 . Effect of gibberellins on seed germination of Tithoniarotundifolia Blake. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(3): 10680-10684.

Praharaj S, Singh D, Guru SK, Meena BR. 2017. Effect of plant growth regulators on tiller dynamics and yield of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management. 8(1):75-78.6.

Rai RK, Tripathi N, Gautam D, Singh P. 2017. Exogenous application of ethrel and gibberellic acid stimulates physiological growth of late planted sugarcane with short growth period in sub-tropical India. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 36(2): 472-486.

Rao GN, Rao NVM, Rao PH. 1960. Preliminary note on the effect of gibberellic acid on growth and tillering of sugarcane. Ind. Jour. of Sugarcane Res. 4(3):148.

Rao JT, Nour AH, El-Manhaly MA .1973. Flowering of sugarcane in Egypt. International

Sugar Journal, 75: 241 -244.

Ren Gao, Chen. 2007. Effects of three growth regulators on growth and sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 9(4): 35-43.

Rizk TY, Khalil HA, Nosaer HM. 2002. Photoperiodic response of five locally developed sugarcane varieties. Arab Universities journal of Agriculture Science, 10 (2) :619-627.

Sartoris GB. 1939. The behavior of sugarcane in relation to length of day. Proceedings of International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 6: 796-801.

SPSS. 2006. User's guide for SPSS for windows evaluation version 15.0, Statistical Program for Social Science, lnc. USA.

Srivastava RP, Singh SE, Singh P, Singh SB .2006. Artificial induction of flowering in sugarcane under sub-tropical conditions - A successful approach. Sugar Tech 8 (2&3) 184-186.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc, New York, USA.

Stevenson GC. 1965. Genetics and breeding of sugarcane, Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd., London. 2.

Sujatha P, Kumar BR, Naidu NV, Charumathi M, Beby P, Jayachandra K. 2018. Plant growth promoters' effect on cane, quality and yield parameters in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum l.). Indian Journal of Crop Technologists 6: 796-801.

Sartoris GB. 942. Longevity of sugarcane and corn pollen—A method for long-distance shipment of sugarcane pollen by airplane. American Journal of Botany. 1; 29:395–400.

Shanmugavadivu R, Rao PG. 2009 . A comparison of flowering behaviour of sugarcane clones in two different locations. Sugar Tech, 11(4):401-404.

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1981. Statistical methods. 7th Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames Lowa,USA.

Solamani A, Sivakumar C, Anbumani S, Suresh T, Arumugam K. 2001. Role of plant growth regulators

on rice production: A review. Agricultural Reviews, 23:33-40. Science, 6(3), 737-743.

Sure S, Arooie H, Azizi M. 2012. Influence of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and planting method on growth and yield in oil pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo var. Styriaca). Notulae Scientia Biologicae 4(2), 101-107.

Tahir ML, Khalil H, McCord PH, Glaz B. 2014. Character association and selection indices in sugarcane. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 4(3):336-348

Van Staden J, Crouch R. 1996. Benzyl adenine and derivatives their significance and interconversion in plants. Plant Growth Regulator, 19, 153-175.

Vijayasaradhy N., Narasimhan R .1953. Control of flowering in sugarcane. Proceedings of International Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 8. 371-401

Vishwakarma AL. 2010. Studies on some biochemical changes during sprouting and tillering of sugarcane. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology, 8(1): 41-49.

Wang Y, Ren T, Lu J, Cong R., Hou W, Liu T, Li X. 2017. Exogenously applied gibberellic acid improves the growth and yield performance of inferior rice tillers grown under different nitrogen levels. Acta physiologiae plantarum, 39(1), 5.

Ward JJH. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function' Journal of the American Statistical Association, (58), pp. 236-244.

Yadav S, Singh S, Yadav S, Kumar A, Sharma B. 2016. Effect of ethrel and gibberellic acid on growth and yield of sugarcane (cv 'CoS 03251') with recommended agronomic practices. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology, 31(02), 65-67.

Yan W, Rajcan IR.2002. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 42:11–20.

Yoder JI, Musselman L, Westhood JH. 2001. Effect of plant growth regulators on sugarcane production in Taiwan. Taiwan Sugar, pp. 17-25.

Downloads

Submitted

04-02-2024

Published

24-05-2025

How to Cite

Abu-Ellail, F. F. B., Salem, E., & A.M., E.-S. (2025). Genotypic interrelationships for flowering traits in sugarcane genotypes treated by Gibberellic acid under natural conditions. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 13(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2023.1.13.28-45
Citation