PREDICTION MODELS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE ESTIMATION OF TOTAL CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN SUGARCANE


488 / 268

Authors

  • Vengavasi Krishnapriya Plant Physiology section, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641007 http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7496-5302
  • R Arunkumar Plant Physiology section, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641007
  • R Gomathi Plant Physiology section, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641007
  • S Vasantha Plant Physiology section, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641007

https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2019.2.9.150-163

Abstract

Total chlorophyll content of sugarcane is an important indicator of plant health, directly correlated to the photosynthetic potential of the crop. With recent technological advancements, portable chlorophyll meters have largely replaced biochemical chlorophyll estimation, requiring laborious extraction procedure with solvents like acetone and dimethyl sulphoxide. Chlorophyll meters determine only ‘greenness’ index, which has to be converted into scientifically standard units in order to make the data comprehensive. Prediction models for inter-conversion of chlorophyll units are available for crops like rice, wheat, sorghum, barley, maize, etc., but not for sugarcane till date. In the present study, total chlorophyll content was recorded in diverse sugarcane germplasm and commercial hybrids using both non-destructive and destructive sampling methods. A strong positive correlation was observed between meter readings (SPAD and CCI) with total chlorophyll content estimated using 80% acetone (r = 0.800 and 0.793) and dimethyl sulphoxide (r = 0.915 and 0.868). Regression models for the best fit curve between meter reading and extracted chlorophyll values of the tested sugarcane germplasm and hybrids were non-linear, polynomial equations of the second order. The model developed was validated in an independent experiment wherein sugarcane variety Co 86032 was subjected to increasing nitrogen levels. Highly significant linear regression was found between observed and predicted values of all estimates of total chlorophyll content with almost negligible prediction error. Thus, the model calibrated and validated for sugarcane germplasm and commercial hybrids would be a small yet significant step towards aiding high-throughput phenotyping in sugarcane thereby accelerating crop improvement programmes.

Author Biography

  • Vengavasi Krishnapriya, Plant Physiology section, Division of Crop Production, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore - 641007

    Scientist (Plant Physiology)

    Division of Crop Production

    ICAR - Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore

     

References

Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts: Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology 24(1):1-15.

Azia F, Stewart KA (2001) Relationships between extractable chlorophyll and SPAD values in muskmelon leaves. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24(6):961-966.

Barnes JD, Balaguer L, Manrique E, Elvira S, Davison AW (1992) A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32(2):85-100.

Castelli F, Contillo R, Miceli F (1996) Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 177(4):275-283.

Gitelson AA, Merzlyak MN (2004) Non-destructive assessment of chlorophyll, carotenoid and anthocyanin content in higher plant leaves: principles and algorithms. Papers in Natural Resources 263.

Hawkins S, Gardiner ES, Comer GS (2009) Modelling the relationship between extractable chlorophyll and SPAD-502 readings for endangered plant species research. Journal for Nature Conservation 17:123-127.

Hiscox JD, Israelstam GF (1979) A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57:1332-1334.

Holm-Hansen O, Riemann B (1978) Chlorophyll a determination: improvements in methodology. Oikos 30:438-447.

Jangpromma N, Songsri P, Thammasirirak S, Jaisil P (2010) Rapid assessment of chlorophyll content in sugarcane using a SPAD chlorophyll meter across different water stress condition. Asian Journal of Plant Science 2010:1-12.

Kapotis G, Zervoudakis G, Veltsistas T, Salahas G (2003) Comparison of chlorophyll meter readings with leaf chlorophyll concentration in Amaranthus vlitus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 50(3):395-397.

Kohila S, Gomathi R (2018) Adaptive physiological and biochemical response of sugarcane genotypes to high-temperature stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 23(3):245-260.

Kumar A, Bhar L (2005) Forecasting model for yield of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) using weather parameter. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75(10):688-690.

Martins MTB, Souza WR, Cunha BADB, Basso MF, Oliveira NG, Vinecky F, Martins PK, Oliveira PA, Arenque-Musa BC, Souza AP, Buckeridge MS, Kobayashi AK, Quirino BF, Molinari HBC (2016) Characterization of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) leaf senescence: implications for biofuel production. Biotechnology for Biofuels 9:153.

Monje OA, Bugbee B (1992) Inherent limitations of non-destructive chlorophyll meters: a comparison of two types of meters. Hortscience 27(1):69-71.

Parry C, Blonquist JM, Bugbee B (2014) In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship. Plant, Cell and Environment 37:2508-2520.

Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 975:384-394.

Porra RJ (2002) The chequered history of the development and use of simultaneous equations for the accurate determination of chlorophylls a and b. Photosynthesis Research 73:149-156.

Radhamani R, Kannan R (2016) Nondestructive and rapid estimation of leaf chlorophyll content of sugarcane using a SPAD meter. International Journal of Science and Research 5(4):2392-2397.

Richardson AD, Duigan SP, Berlyn GP (2002) An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytologist 153:185-194.

Ritchie RJ (2006) Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents. Photosynthesis Research 89:27-41.

Rodriguez IR, Miller GL (2000) Using a chlorophyll meter to determine the chlorophyll concentration, nitrogen concentration and visual quality of St. Augustinegrass. Hortscience 35(4):751-754.

Samsone I, Andersone U, Vikmane M, Ievina B, Pakarna G, Ievinsh G (2007) Nondestructive methods in plant biology: an accurate measurement of chlorophyll content by a chlorophyll meter. Acta Universitatis Latviensis 723:145-154.

Schaper H, Chacko EK (1991) Relations between extractable chlorophyll and portable chlorophyll meter readings in leaves of eight tropical and subtropical fruit-tree species. Journal of Plant Physiology 138(6):674-677.

Silva MA, Jifon JL, Da Silva JAG, Sharma V (2007) Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19(3):193-201.

Silva MA, Jifon JL, Santos CM, Jadoski CJ, Silva JAG (2013) Photosynthetic capacity and water use efficiency in sugarcane genotypes subjected to water deficit during early growth phase. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 56(5):735-748.

Silva MA, Rhein AFL, Barbosa AM (2017) Physiology and productivity of sugarcane as affected by nitrogen applied via subsurface drip irrigation. Journal of Environment and Agricultural Sciences 11:15-28.

Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, Pleijel H (2007) Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynthesis Research 91(1):37-46.

Vasantha S, Rajalakshmi R (2009) Progressive changes in biochemical characters of sugarcane genotypes under salinity stress. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 14(1):34-38.

Vasantha S, Gomathi R, Brindha R (2017) Growth and nutrient composition of sugarcane genotypes subjected to salinity and drought stresses. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48(9):989-998.

Yamamoto A, Nakamura T, Adu-Gyamfi JJ, Saigusa M (2002) Relationship between chlorophyll content in leaves of sorghum and pigeonpea determined by extraction method and by chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502). Journal of Plant Nutrition 25(10):2295-2301.

Yuan Z, Cao Q, Zhang K, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Tian Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Liu X (2016) Optimal leaf positions for SPAD meter measurement in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:719.

Zhu J, Tremblay N, Liang Y (2012) Comparing SPAD and atLEAF values for chlorophyll assessment in crop species. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92:645-648.

Downloads

Submitted

02-11-2019

Published

11-06-2020

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Krishnapriya, V., Arunkumar, R., Gomathi, R., & Vasantha, S. (2020). PREDICTION MODELS FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE ESTIMATION OF TOTAL CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT IN SUGARCANE. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2019.2.9.150-163
Citation