Red rot disease resistance in interspecific hybrids of sugarcane derived from diverse cytotypes of Saccharum spontaneum L.


172 / 111

Authors

  • ANGANNAN SUGANYA ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute
  • P. Govindaraj PS,ICAR-SBI
  • A.Selvi PS,ICAR-SBI
  • Viswanathan R Director, ICAR-IISR, LUCKNOW

https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2023.1.13.21-27

Keywords:

Red rot; Resistance; Hybrids; Cytotype ;S. spontaneum; Frequency

Abstract

Red rot disease has caused major loss to sugarcane crops for more than a hundred years.  It  is caused by the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum falcatum Went. In sugarcane breeding, the development of resistant varieties through inter varietal hybridization is a major challenge. Pre-breeding is an ideal approach to incorporate resistance. Saccharum spontaneum, the wild species of sugarcane has been utilized in sugarcane breeding since 1912 owing to their wider adaptability to biotic and abiotic stresses. It shows cytomorphological diversity with 41 cytotypes from 2n=40-128.The major cytotypes are 2n=40, 2n=48, 2n=56, 2n=60, 2n=64, 2n=72, 2n=80, 2n=88, 2n=96, 2n=112, 2n=120 and 2n=128, of which the cytotype 2n=64 is the predominant one. The actual frequency and level of red rot resistance in the hybrids derived from different ploidies /cytotypes of S. spontaneum are yet to be ascertained. About 588 hybrids derived from 37 interspecific crosses involving eight commercial varieties and 16 clones of S. spontaneum with eight cytotypes (2n=40, 56, 60, 64, 72, 80, 88, 112) were evaluated for red rot resistance at 6th  month under controlled condition using the pathotype CF 06 (Cf 671). Resistance observed in 44.3% of the hybrids in which 28.9% was MR and 15.4%  of  R  types.  Differential  segregation  of  chromosomes  from  different  cytotypes  imparted  differential  reactions  in  the progenies to red rot pathogen. The progenies with 2n=40, 64, 72, 80, 88 and 112 imparted resistance at higher frequency from 31.5% to 56.0%. The contribution of lower cytotypes for imparting resistance was 43.5% (2n=40), 19.4% (2n=56) and 16.0% (2n=60). Among the lower cytotypes, higher frequency of resistance with 2n=40 is due to the segregation of the whole genomic complement of 40 chromosomes of male gamete (S. spontaneum) to the progenies through n+2n transmission. Though 64 cytotype derived hybrids had 32 chromosomes through n+n transmission they sustained resistance in 48.7% of progenies. Among the higher cytotypes, 88 and 112 produced maximum resistant progenies at a frequency of 56%. It indicates that enhanced ploidies with the higher male genomic/gametic component impart resistance at a higher frequency. It is advantageous for sugarcane breeding to attain stable resistance. Hence, this study suggests utilizing the resistant hybrids of the higher cytotype derived crosses for nobilisation to achieve horizontal/stable resistance.

Author Biography

  • ANGANNAN SUGANYA, ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute
    ICAR

References

Alarmelu S, Nagarajan R, Shanthi RM, Mohanraj D, Padmanabhan P 2010. A study on genetics of red rot resistance in sugarcane. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1: 656- 659.

Babu C, Koodalingam K, Natarajan US, Shanthi RM Govindaraj P 2009. Genetic enhancement of sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids) for resistance to red rot disease and economic traits. The Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4: 97-107.

Babu C, Natarajan, US, Shanthi RM, Govindaraj P, Ramesh Sunder A Viswanathan R 2010 Inheritance of red rot resistance in sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids). Sugar Tech. 12: 167-171.

Baksha R, Alam MM, Kamal B, Podder P, Rahman ASMM 2003. Screening of different sugarcane species (Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum) for red rot disease resistance. Pakistan Journal of Plant Pathology, 2(2):111-113.

Chaudhary BS,Virk KS, Ram K 1988. Inheritance of red rot resistance in sugarcane. Agricultural Science Digest, 8:210-212.

Govindaraj P, Nair NV, Suganya A, Sreenivasa V .2012 . Development and biomass characterization of new energy canes. Proceedings of International Symposium on New Paradigms in Sugarcane Research, 335.

Janakiammal EK 1936. Cytogenetic analyses of S. spontaneum L. 1. Chromosome studies in some Indian forms. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 6:1-8.

Natarajan US, Ramana Rao TC, Balasundaram N, Palanichamy K, Tripathi BK, 1998. Red rot resistance in sugarcane-a critique. Sugar Cane, 1:11-14.

Natarajan US, Balasundaram N, Ramana Rao TC, Padmanaban P, Mohanraj D, Karthigeyan S, Kannan R, Damodaran S 2001. Red rot resistance in sugarcane in terms of vertical and horizontal resistance. Proceedings of Diamond Jubilee Symposium, Hundred years of Post-Mendelian Genetics and Plant Breeding –Retrospect and Prospects,106.

Natarajan US, Balasundaram N, Ramana Rao TC, Padmanaban P, Mohanraj D, Karthigeyan S, Damodaran S 2001b. Role of Saccharum spontaneum in imparting stable resistance against sugarcane red rot. Sugarcane International,17-20.

Nisha M, Chandran K, Manjunatha T, Viswanathan R, Gireesan PP 2019. Genetic variability for agro morphological traits among the interspecific hybrids of Saccharum. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 9(1):55-63

Panje R R, Babu C N 1960. Studies on Saccharum spontaneum: distribution and geographical association of chromosome numbers. Cytologia, 25:152-172.

Ram B, Singh N, Sahi BK 2005. Combining ability and heterosis for disease index of red rot in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 65: 112-114.

Selvi A, Nair NV, Noyer JL, Singh NK, Balasundaram N, Bansal KC, Koundal KR and Mohapatra T 2005. Genomic constitution and genetic relationship among the tropical and sub tropical Indian sugarcane cultivars revealed by AFLP. Crop Science, 45: 1750- 1757.

Singh SP, Vishwakarma SK, Das SP, Kumar MM Srivastava VK 2019. Frequency of red rot resistance in the progeny population of various cross combinations. Agricultural Science Digest, 39(3): 232-235.

Sobhakumari VP 2013. New determinations of somatic chromosome number in cultivated and wild species of Saccharum. Carylogia, 66: 268-274.

Sobhakumari VP, Asmita D 2014. Cytogenetics and performance analysis of pre-breeding hybrids of Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum . Journal of Sugarcane Research, 4 (1): 33-39.

Sreenivasan TV, Ahloowalia BS, Heinz DJ 1987. In: Sugarcane improvement through breeding. Ed. Heinz DJ, Elsevier, 211–253.

Suganya A, Nithiyanantham R, Premachandran MN, Balasundaram N, Govindaraj P, Selvi A, Nair NV 2012. Cytological studies in hybrids between a sugarcane cultivar and three cytotypes of wild Saccharum spontaneum L. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 2(2): 34-40.

Suganya A 2014a. Cytotype diversity in Saccharum spontaneum L. and its utilization for sugarcane improvement. Proceedings of National Seminar on Emerging trends in Biodiversity conservation and sustainable utilization, 28.

Suganya A, Amudha A, Valarmathi R 2014b Differential elimination of chromosomes in interspecific hybrids of sugarcane derived with different cytotypes of Saccharum spontaneum, L. Proceedings of National seminar on Challenges and innovative approaches in crop improvement, 157.

Suganya A, Selvi A 2015. Chromosome transmission patterns in interspecific hybrids of sugarcane derived with different cytotypes of Saccharum spontaneum L. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Next Generation Genomics and Integrated Breeding for Crop Improvement, 31.

Viswanathan R 2010. Plant Disease: Red rot of Sugarcane. Anmol Publications, 301.

Viswanathan R 2017. Pathogen virulence in sugarcane red rot pathogen versus varieties in cultivation: Classical case of loss in virulence in the pathotype CF06 (Cf671). Sugar Tech,19: 293-299.

Viswanathan R 2016. Varietal degeneration in sugarcane and its management in India. Sugar Tech, 18: 1-7.

Viswanathan R, Mohanraj D, Padmanaban P 1998. Comparison of three testing methods for evaluation of resistance to red rot caused by Colletotrichum falcatum in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 68 (4): 226-230.

Yin Z, Hoy JW, Milligan SB 1996. Evaluation and heritability of resistance to sugarcane red rot. Phytopathology, 86(6): 662-667.

Downloads

Submitted

23-10-2023

Published

24-05-2025

How to Cite

SUGANYA, A., P. Govindaraj, A.Selvi, & R, V. (2025). Red rot disease resistance in interspecific hybrids of sugarcane derived from diverse cytotypes of Saccharum spontaneum L. Journal of Sugarcane Research, 13(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.37580/JSR.2023.1.13.21-27
Citation