DUS testing in 15 Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Varieties of Central India


418 / 313

Authors

  • DK VERMA ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Daly College Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452 001, India Author
  • JB SINGH ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Daly College Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452 001, India Author
  • RAVINDRA PANWAR ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station, Daly College Road, Indore, Madhya Pradesh-452 001, India Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v50i2.154560

Keywords:

DUS, characterization, identification, bread and durum wheat varieties

Abstract

Present investigation was carried out at ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, Regional Station,Indore during Rabi seasons of 2020-21 and 2021-22 to examine the different morphological characters for distinctness, uniformity and stability of durum and bread wheat varieties. Fifteen genotypes were studied over two years and observations on thirty six morphological characters were recorded. The study revealed that morphological characters of wheat plant viz. plant growth habit, coleoptile anthocyanin colouration, flag leaf anthocyanin colouration of auricle, time of ear emergence, ear waxiness, waxiness of peduncle, flag leaf length, peduncle attitude, flag leaf width, plant height, lower glume shoulder width, lower glume shoulder shape, outer glume pubescence, and awns attitude were the most important characters which could easily distinguish the durum wheat varieties. The characters like foliage colour, flag leaf attitude, flag leaf waxiness of sheath, ear length, lower glume beak length, lower glume beak shape, flag leaf waxiness of blade, ear colour, awns colour, are also found useful in distinguishing durum wheat varieties. The seed morphological characteristics such as grain hardness, grain germ width and grain shape are found to be useful in discriminating bread and durum wheat varieties. But some characters like ear density, awn length and 1000 seed weight are not found to be so useful in distinguishing bread and durum wheat varieties in the present investigation. The study also revealed that the characters viz., flag leaf hairs on
auricle, brush hairs, peduncle length, ear shape in profile easily distinguished bread wheat variety from rest of the durum wheat varieties. But these characters could not distinguish among durum wheat varieties. The grain colouration with phenol also could not distinguish among durum wheat varieties but it strongly distinguished bread wheat variety from all the durum wheat varieties in the study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

KANT, S., R.A.S. LAMBA., R.K. ARYA & I.S. PANWAR (2014).

Effect of terminal heat stress on stability of yield and quality

parameters in bread wheat in southwest Haryana. Journal of

Wheat Research 6(1): 64-73.

GUIN, K., S.K. SETHI & R.K. ARYA (2019). Genetic Studies

on Triticum timopheevi Based Cytoplasmic Genetic Male

Sterility (CGMS) System in Relation to Hybrid Seed Production

in Wheat (T. aestivum L.). Ekin Journal of Crop Breeding and

Genetics. 5(2): 103-110

PREETI PANWAR, I.S. & R.K. ARYA (2016). Effects of

changing environment on wheat dry matter yield Forage

Research, 42 (1): 56-61.

SETHI, S.K. & R.K. ARYA (2012). Importance of durum wheat

in changing social life. Wheat and Barley Sawarnima.4: 76-

VERMA, D.K., A.K. SINGH & D.N. SINGH (2021) Wheat

Breeding for Multifunctional Agriculture, Biotech Books, New

Delhi, pp978.

YADAV, A.K., M.S. NARWAL & R.K. ARYA (2013).

Morphological characterization of Indian mustard (Brassica

juncea) genotypes and their application for DUS testing. Indian

Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 83(12):1305-1316.

PPV&FRA (2007) Guidelines for the Conduct of Test for

Distinctiveness, Uniformity and Stability on Bread Wheat

(Triticum aestivum L), Bulletin SG/02/2007 dt 20 February,

, PPVFRA Authority, GOI, New Delhi, pp 17.

KUNDU, S., J. SHORAN & B. MISHRA (2006). National

Guidelines for the conduct of tests for Distinctness, Uniformity

and Stability- Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Research

Bulletin No. 22. Directorate of Wheat Research, Karnal,

(India), pp32.

DHESI, N.S., R.W. DESORMEAUX & J. PAUKENS (1969).

Identification of wheat and barley varieties at the seedling

stage. Proceedings of Association of Official Seed Analysts.

: 134-140.

FRASER, J.G.C. & F. GIELIER (1935). Two new methods of

distinguishing certain Canadian wheat. Sci. Agric. 15: 564-

KOCHETOVA, E.A. (1971). Determination of authenticity of

wheat seeds by laboratory methods. Trudypo Prikladnoi

Botanike, Genetike Selektsii. 44(3): 5-49.

MILAN, A.L. & S.M.A. HOSSAIN (1973). Evaluation of plant

characters of some local and exotic varieties of rice. Science

and Industry. 8(3-4): 269-276.

HALJAK, M. (2005). The distinctness of spring wheat

perspective breeds by morphological characteristics.

Transactions of the Estonian Agricultural University, Agronomy.

: 51-53.

SHARIEF, A.E., S.A. EL-MOURSY, A.M. SALAMA, M.I. ELEMERY & F.E. YOUSSEF (2005). Morphological and

molecular biochemical identification of some rice (Oryza sativa

L.) cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 5(9):

-1279.

PANWAR, I.S., A.S. REDHU, S.R. VERMA, S.K. KARWASRA,

O.P. BISHNOI & R.K. ARYA (2013). WH 1105: A new wheat

variety for timely sown irrigated conditions in north western

plains zone of India. Journal of Wheat Research. 5(2):74-75.

SINGH, T. & R.K. SHARMA (2007). Genetic variability,

character association and path analysis of yield and its

component characters in durum wheat. Progressive

Agriculture. 7(1/2): 15-18.

REEVES, J.C. & M.M. BOYD (1984). The use of some spike

and spikelet characters in establishing the distinctness of

ryegrass cultivars. Journal of the National Institute of

Agricultural Botany, UK. 16 (3): 513-525.

MOTZO, R. & F. GIUNTA (2002). Awnedness affects grain

yield and kernel weight in near isogenic lines of durum wheat.

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(2): 1285-1293.

GALUSSI, A.A., L.R. ZIMMERMANN, F.G. MARCHESE, M.E.

MOYA, D.P. REINOSO, A. CEVEDO & C. ROMERO (1999).

Using seedling hairiness to identify varieties of oats, rice and

wheat. Seed Science and Technology. 27(3): 1047-1050.

NETHRA, N., S. RAJENDRAPRASAD, K. VISHWANATH,

K.N. DHANRAJ & R. GOWDA (2007). Identification of rice

hybrids and their parental lines based on seed, seedling

characters, chemical tests and gel electrophoresis of total

soluble seed proteins. Seed Science and Technology. 35: 176-

Mor, R.S., K.R. Buttan & B.S. Mehla (2006). Identification of

rice varieties by laboratory techniques. National Journal of

Plant Improvement. 8(1): 28-31

Wrigley C.W. (1976). Single seed identification of wheat

varieties: use of grain hardness testing, electrophoretic

analysis and a rapid test paper for phenol reaction. Journal of

Science, Food and Agriculture. 27: 429-432.

GUPTA, N., M.A. JOSHI, N.K. SARAO & R.C. SHRAMA

(2007). Utility of phenol test in varietal characterization. Crop

Improvement. 34(1): 77-81.

Downloads

Submitted

2024-08-02

Published

2024-08-05

How to Cite

DK VERMA, JB SINGH, & RAVINDRA PANWAR. (2024). DUS testing in 15 Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Varieties of Central India. Seed Research, 50(2), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v50i2.154560