Evaluation of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties for Growth, Yield and Quality of Seed Under Malwa Region of Madhya Pradesh


687 / 74

Authors

  • SHYAM KUMAR PATIDAR College of Horticulture, Mandsaur–458002, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • SS KUSHWAH College of Horticulture, Mandsaur–458002, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • OP SINGH College of Horticulture, Mandsaur–458002, Madhya Pradesh, India Author
  • IS NARUKA College of Horticulture, Mandsaur–458002, Madhya Pradesh, India Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v51i1.154665

Keywords:

Pea, Pisum sativum, varieties, growth, yield, seed quality

Abstract

Twelve pea varieties V1 - Arka Kartik, V2-Azad Pea-3, V3 - Pusa Pragati, V4 - Kashi Shakti, V5 - Kashi Samarth, V6- Arkel, V7- Kashi Mukti, V8- Kashi Uday, V9- Kashi Nandini, V10-Matar Ageta-6, V11-Arka Ajit and V12-Bonneville were evaluated for growth, yield and seed quality in randomized block design with four replications. Findings revealed that maximum plant height, number of leaves per plant, number of branches per plant, fresh weight of plant and dry weight of plant were recorded in Kashi Shakti. Highest number of root nodules was observed with Kashi Shakti under the study. Matar Ageta-6 recorded minimum days taken to 50% flowering. Maximum number of pod per plant was found with variety Kashi Shakti. Maximum number of seeds per pod and length of pod were recorded in variety Pusa Pragati. Highest shelling percentage was observed in case of variety Matar Ageta-6 which was followed by Kashi Shakti, Kashi Samarth and Arka Kartik with non significant difference.
Maximum seed yield per hectare was found in variety Kashi Shakti which was followed by Kashi Samarth, Pusa Pragati and Kashi Uday with non significant differences. Rest of the varieties differed significantly from Kashi Shakti. Maximum germination percentage was recorded in Kashi Mukti which was at par to Arkel, Kashi Shakti, Kashi Uday, Azad Pea-3, Arka Ajit. Kashi Nandini, Kashi Samarth, Pusa Pragati, Matar Ageta-6 and Bonneville. Maximum 100 seed weight (20.88g) was observed in Matar Ageta-6, followed by Kashi Samarth, Pusa Pragati, Bonneville, Arka Kartik and Arka Ajit with non significant differences. Seed vigour index was highest with Arkel (3662.25) which was at par with Matar Ageta-6, Kashi Shakti, Kashi Mukti, Azad Pea-3, Arka Ajit. Kashi Uday and Arka Kartik.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

FAGERIA MS, RS DHAKA AND BR CHAUDHARY (2002). A

text book on production technology of vegetables. Vol. II,

Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, p127.

ISTA (1985). International Seed Testing Association.

International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol., 13:

-355.

ABDUL-BAKI AA, AND JD ANDERSON (1973). Vigor

determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop

Science, 13: 630-633.

GUPTA AJ AND YV SINGH (2007). Evaluation of garden pea

(Pisum sativum) genotypes for earliness, yield and quality

attributes. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 36(1&2): 106-110.

SINGH R AND PM SINGH (2011). Effect of sowing dates and

varieties on yield and quality of garden pea seed. Veg. Sci.,

(2): 184-187.

SINGH RK, J SINGH, N DE AND M RAI (2006). Effect of

nutrient on yield and root parameters in vegetable pea. Veg.

Sci. 33 (1): 88-90.

KUMAR A, M KUMAR AND UK KOHLI (2008). Genetic

parameters and character association in garden pea cultivars.

Veg. Sci., 35 (2): 160-164.

HUSSAIN SI, A JAN, CM FAROOQ AND T MAHMOOD (2000).

Comparative evaluation of pea cultivars for yield and yield

components under Islamabad conditions. Sarhad J. Agric.,

(2): 159-161.

KALLOO G, M RAI, J SINGH, A VERMA AND R KUMAR

(2005). Morphological and biochemical variability in vegetable

pea (Pisum sativum L.). Veg. Sci., 32(1): 19-23.

QASIM M, M ZUBAIR AND D WADAN (2001). Evaluation of

exotic cultivars of pea in Swat valley. Sarhad J. Agric., 17 (4):

-548.

AGARWAL A, S GUPTA AND Z AHMED (2006). Performance

of garden pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars in high-altitude cold

desert of Ladakh. J. Agric. Sci., 76(12): 713-715.

ASHRAF MI, MA PERVEZ, M AMJAD, R AHMAD AND M

AYUB (2011). Qualitative and quantitative response of pea

(Pisum sativum L.) cultivars to judicious applications of

irrigation with phosphorus and potassium. Pak. J. Life Soc.

Sci., 9 (2): 159-164.

CHADHA S, RAMESHWAR, JP SAINI AND S SHARMA

(2013). Performance of different varieties of pea (Pisum

sativum L.) under organic farming conditions in mid Himalayas.

Int. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol., 4 (7): 733-738.

SINGH SP AND NC GAUTAM (2000). Relative performance

of pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars under variable dates of sowing

and irrigation conditions. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 29 (1/2): 123-

Downloads

Submitted

2024-08-05

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

SHYAM KUMAR PATIDAR, SS KUSHWAH, OP SINGH, & IS NARUKA. (2026). Evaluation of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Varieties for Growth, Yield and Quality of Seed Under Malwa Region of Madhya Pradesh. Seed Research, 51(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v51i1.154665