Chemical and Biochemical Characterization of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) Genotypes
47 / 10
Keywords:
Characterization, Gibberellic acid test, NaOH test, Phenol content, SafflowerAbstract
The present investigation entitled, Characterization of safflower genotypes by chemical and biochemical analysis was carried out at (Seed Technology Research Unit (STRU) laboratory) Department of Agricultural Botany and Department of Biochemistry, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri for testing quality of sixteen safflower genotypes. There was significant difference in the seed coat colour development due to NaOH test. The cultivars were grouped into three colour reaction groups as light brown (SSF-1307, Bhima, SSF708, SSF-674, A-1, SSF-748, Phule kusuma), Brown (Nari-6, PBNS- 86, SSF-1371, PBNS-12, SSF- 733) and Dark brown (SSF-1240, Nari-57, SSF-658, PBNS-40) based on colour reaction to NaOH test. There was significant difference in total phenol content of different safflower genotypes. The highest phenol content was recorded in the genotype SSF- 748 (5.56 mg/g). All sixteen safflower genotypes under study showed no colour reaction (negative) for peroxidase test. The safflower genotypes showed significant difference to gibberellic acid test. The response of seedling of different safflower genotypes to GA3, genotypes were grouped into very low response over control (SSF-1240, SSF-658, SSF-1307, SSF-748), low response over control (SSF-1371, SSF-674, Nari-6), medium response over control (SSF-733, PBNS-40, A-1, SSF-708, Nari-57) and high response over control (Bhima, Phule kusuma, PBNS-86, PBNS-12). The NaOH test, Phenol content and Gibberellic acid test can be used for characterization of safflower genotypes under study.
Downloads
References
KNOWLES PF AND A ASHRI (1995). Safflower Carthamus
tinctorius (Compositae). In: Evolution of crop plants 2nd edition.
Edited by Smartt, J., Simmonds, N.W and Harlow, U.K.
Longman 47-50.
GARNATJE T, S GARCIA, R VILATERSANA AND J VALLES
(2006). Genome size variation in the genus Carthamus
(Asteraceae, Cardueae): Systematic implications and additive
changes during allopolyplodization. Annals of Botany, 97: 461-
LI D AND HH MUNDEL (1996). Safflower Carthamus tinctorius
L. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and
neglected crops. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop. Plant
Research, Gatersleben International Plant Genetic Resources
Institute, Rome. Pp:83.
FERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ JM, M RIO AND A HARO (1993).
Survey of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius. L) germplasm for
variants in fatty acid composition and other seed characters.
Euphytica, 69: 115-122.
FAOSTAT (2012). Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome,
Italy. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org.
AGARWAL RL AND A PAWAR (1990). Identification of soybean
varieties based on seed and seedling characteristics. Seed
Research, 18: 77-81.
CHAKRABARTHY SK AND RL AGARWAL (1989).
Identification of black gram varieties-I, utilization of seed
characteristics. Seed Research, 17: 23-28.
GHADGE SH (2005). Characterization of safflower cultivars
through morphological characters, chemical and electrophoretic techniques, M.Sc. thesis submitted to MPKV, Rahuri,
Ahemadnagar.
BRAY G AND WV THORPE (1954). Analysis of phenolic
compounds of interest metabolism. Methods of Biochemical
Analysis, 1: 27-52.
DEPAUW RM AND TN MCCAIG (1982). Utilization of sodium
hydroxide to assess kernel color and its inheritance in eleven
spring wheat varieties. Journal of Plant Sciences, 68: 323-
SIMPSON AG (1935). A simple method for determining the
“Yellowness” and “Grade” of wheat flours. Cereal Chemistry,
: 569-574.
BEN MOUMEN A, L ZRAIBI AND F MANSOURI (2013).
Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of seed oils of
four saûower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) varieties grown in
eastern Morocco. In: Symposium International des Plantes
Aromatiques Medicinales (SIPAM5).
ROBERT E, OA VOGEL AND JC CRADDOCK (1980). Effect
of gibberellic acid upon seedling emergence of slow and fast
emerging wheat varieties. Agronomy Journal, 46: 30-32.