Channelizing Protected Farmer’s Varieties through Semi-Formal Seed Systems for Effective Utilization and Conservation of Agro-biodiversity: An Overview
41 / 8
Authors
-
RP SINGH
ICAR-IARI, New Delhi - 110012, India
Author
-
SUPRIYA SINGH
ICAR-IARI, New Delhi - 110012, India
Author
-
SANDEEP KUMAR LAL
ICAR-IARI, New Delhi - 110012, India
Author
Keywords:
Farmers/ local varieties, Modern varieties, Plant variety protection, Quality declared seed, Semi-formal seed systemAbstract
The paradigm of agricultural development based on maximizing grain yield in major cereal crops led to increased production of high-yielding wheat, and rice and replacement of other more nutrient-rich coarse cereals. The circulation of seed among farmers is central to agro-biodiversity conservation and dynamics. The local varieties (LVs) still cover significant area and virtually grown in all regions and seasons in India; the performance of farmers varieties (FVs)/ LVs is comparable under marginal conditions and even these varieties can out yield high yielding varieties (HYVs) under certain marginal environmental conditions. However, HYVs performed extremely well under favorable environmental conditions with high input and better management conditions and therefore, highly responsive to inputs. The low yield of FVs/LVs over modern varieties (MV’s) can be increased by a margin up to 20-25% by supplying quality seed of FVs alone. In the legal instrument (PPV&FR Act, 2001), farmers have been treated at par with formal breeders but the varieties developed by the former face difficulty to qualify for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability (DUS) tests, particularly in cross pollinated crops and therefore being marginalized. To take the full advantage of the rich genetic diversity in the form of FVs, an alternative registration and certification system developed by the food and agriculture organization of the United Nations known as Quality Declared Seed (QDS) system is advocated to channelize and commercialize FVs using formal system. The QDS is an alternative way to reach small and marginal farmers, who have limited access to certified seed for crop production; this system being semi-formal is less stringent and inexpensive as compared to conventional seed certification with the focus on local seed market. The semi formal seed systems are the needs of the day to provide the quality seed of FVs and indigenous/ under-utilized crops at local level in order to increase the resilience of the seed system for effective utilization and maintenance of agro biodiversity which is depleting at a faster pace. The semi-formal seed system may also serve as a bridge between formal and informal seed systems.
Downloads
References
RAHMAN S, MP SHARMA AND S SAHAI (2006). Nutritional
and medicinal values of some indigenous rice varieties. Indian
Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 5(4), 454-458.
DOGRA B (1983). India: The new seeds. A disaster in the
making as pests have a field- day with the high yield varieties.
Ecologist, 13(6): 222-223.
KATYAL JC AND MRUTHYUNJAYA (2003). The CGIAR at
: An Independent Meta-Evaluation of the Consultative
Group on International Agricultural Research CGIAR
Effectiveness - A NARS Perspective from India.
PRAY CE AND L NAGARAJAN (2012). Innovation and
research by private agribusiness in India. International Food
Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) discussion paper 1181.
Washington DC.
REKHA T, KP MARTIN, VB SREEKUMAR AND J
MADASSERY (2011). Genetic diversity assessment of rarely
cultivated traditional indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties.
Biotechnology Research International, pp: 7. doi:10.4061/
/784719.
JARVIS DI, T HODGKIN, BR STHAPIT, C FADDA AND I
LOPEZ-NORIEGA (2011). An heuristic framework for
identifying multiple ways of supporting the conservation and
use of traditional crop varieties within the agricultural
production system. Critical Reviews in Plant Science, 30(1&2),
-176.
FRISON E AND T HODGKIN (2016). Strategic opportunities
to strengthen community based approaches to seed agro
biodiversity. Opportunities Report IN; The Future of Food:
Seeds of Resilience, A Compendium of Perspectives on
Agricultural Biodiversity from Around the World. Global
Alliance for the Future of Food,(2016) 25-53 available at https:/
/futureoffood.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Seeds-ofResilience_Full-Compendium.pdf.
BELL MA, RA FISCHER, DB YERLEE AND K SAYRE (1995).
Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: A case
study for wheat. Field Crops Research, 44: 55-65.
FUGLIE K, N BALLENGER, KDRUBENSTEIN, C KLOTZ,
MOLLINGER, J REILLY, U VASAVADA AND J YEE
(1996).Agricultural Research and Development: Public and
Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and
Institutions. Agricultural Economic Report No. 735.
Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, USDA. pp: 7.
PANDEY S AND D GAUCHAN (2012). Synthesis of key results
and implications In: Patterns of adoption of improved rice
varieties and farm-level impacts in stress-prone rain-fed areas
in South Asia. Pandey S, Gauchan D, Malabayabas M, BoolEmerick M, Hardy B. (Eds.) Los Baños (Philippines):
International Rice Research Institute, pp. 1-18.
FUWA N, N EDMONDS AND P BANIK (2007). Are small-scale
rice farmers in eastern India really inefficient? Examining the
effects of microtopography on technical efficiency estimates.
Agricultural Economics, 36: 335-346.
SINGH RP, A KUMAR AND SK PAL (2016). The prevalence,
productivity and protection of traditional varieties vis-à-vis
modern varieties in Eastern India: An appraisal. Jharkhand
Journal of Development and Management Studies, 14(2):
-6970.
SINGH, RP, DK AGARWAL, SR PRASAD, KV SRIPATHYAND
SP JEEVAN KUMAR (2017). Varietal and seed replacement
in the era of climate change. Pp: 156 ISBN: 978-81-925128-
-6 published by Indian Council of Agricultural Research -
Indian Institute of Seed Science (ICAR-IISS), Mau, U.P, India.
BYERLEE D AND G TRAXLER (1995). National and
international research in the post-green revolution period:
evolution and impacts. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, 77: 268-278.
SMALE M, J SINGH, SD FALCO AND P ZAMBRANO (2008).
Wheat breeding, productivity and slow variety change:
evidence from the Punjab of India after the Green Revolution.
The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource
Economics, 52: 419–432.
MORRIS ML, J RISOPOULOS AND D BECK (1999). Genetic
Change in Farmer-Recycled Maize Seed: A Review of the
Evidence. CIMMYT Economics Working Paper No. 99-07.
Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT, ISSN: 0258-8587.
ANONYMOUS (2009). Government of India, The Gazette of
India Extraordinary. Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i). G.S.R.
(E). June 30, 2009.
PESCHARD K (2017). Seed wars and farmers’ rights:
comparative perspectives from Brazil and India. The Journal
of Peasant Studies, 44(1): 144-168.
SINGH RP (2018). Integration and commercialization of local
varieties under sub-optimal environments for food security,
promoting sustainable agriculture and agro-biodiversity
conservation. MOJ Ecology and Environmental Sciences,
(2): 65-67.
SINGH RP AND RC AGRAWAL (2018). Improving efficiency
of seed system by appropriating farmer’s rights in India
through adoption and implementation of policy of quality
declared seed schemes in parallel. MOJ Ecology and
Environmental Sciences, 3(6): 387-391.
PLUCKNETT DL AND ME HORNE (1992). Conservation of
genetic resources. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,
: 75-92.
WOOD D AND JM LENNE (1997). The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm.
Biodiversity and Conservation, 6(1): 109-129.
SALAZAR R, NP LOUWAARS AND B VISSER (2006). On
Protecting Farmers’ New Varieties: New Approaches to Rights
on Collective Innovations in Plant Genetic Resources. CAPRi
Working Paper # 45. International Food Policy Research
Institute (IFPRI) 2033 K Street, N.W. Washington, D C, U.S.A.
SRINIVASA RAO C, R LAL, JVNS PRASAD, KA GOPINATH,
R SINGH, VS JAKKULA, KL SAHRAWAT, B
VENKATESWARLU, AK SIKKA, SM VIRMANI (2015).
Potential and Challenges of Rain-fed Farming in India. In:
Sparks, D.L. (Ed.). Advances in Agronomy, 133: 113-181.
TRIPP R (1997). New seed and old laws. Regulatory reform
and the diversification of national seed systems. Intermediate
Technology Publications on behalf of the Overseas
Development Institute, London, pp: 259.
KANSIIME MK AND A MASTENBROEK (2016). Enhancing
resilience of farmer seed system to climate-induced stresses:
Insights from a case study in West Nile region, Uganda.
Journal of Rural Studies, 47: 220-230.
LOUWAARS N (2002). Seed policy, legislation and law:
Widening a narrow focus (ed.). Binghamton: Food Products
Press.
ANONYMOUS (2016). State of Indian Agriculture 2015-16.
Government of India Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare
Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare
Directorate of Economics and Statistics New Delhi, 2016.
Retrieved from eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/ State of Indian
Agriculture, 2015-16.
LOUWAARS N (1994). Integrated seed supply, a flexible
approach. In: Seed production by smallholder farmers.
Proceedings of the ILCA/ICARDA research planning
workshop, Hanson J (Ed.). International Livestock Centre for
Africa, Addis Ababa, 39-56.
ANONYMOUS (2009). Government of India, The Gazette of
India Extraordinary. Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i). G.S.R.
(E). June 30, 2009.
SRINIVASAN SC (2016). Institutional capacity and
implementation issues in farmers’ rights. In: Halewood, H. (Eds.),
Farmers’ crop varieties and farmers’ rights: Challenges in
taxonomy and law. Issues in Agricultural Biodiversity, 249-281.
SERPOLAY-BESSON E, S GIULIANO, N SCHERMANN AND
V CHABLE (2014). Evaluation of Evolution and Diversity of
Maize Open-Pollinated Varieties Cultivated under Contrasted
Environmental and Farmers’ Selection Pressures: A
Phenotypical Approach, Open Journal of Genetics, 4: 125-
SPIELMAN DJ AND M SMALE (2017).Policy Options to
accelerate Variety Change among Smallholder Farmers in
South Asia and Africa South of the Sahara, Environment and
Production Technology Division. IFPRI Discussion Paper
, pp: 68.
MISHRA S, SS CHAUDHURY AND VA NAMBI (2012).
Strengthening of traditional paddy seed selection practices
of tribal farm families with improved knowledge and skills in
Koraput district, Odisha. Indian Journal of Traditional
Knowledge, 11(3): 461-470.
DE BOEF WS, NP LOUWAARS AND CJM ALMEKINDERS
(1997). Methodology issues in strengthening farmers’
research and technology development. New frontiers in
participatory research and gender analysis for technology
development. Proceedings of the 1996 International Seminar
on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology
Development in Cali, Colombia. International Centre for
Tropical Agriculture, Cali, 1997: 87-100.
ALMEKINDERS C (2000). The importance of informal seed
sector and its relation with the legislative framework, Paper
presented at GTZ-Eschborn, July 4-5, 2000. Retrieved from
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/.
CHRISTINCK A, M DIARRA AND G HORNEBER (2014).
Innovations in Seed Systems. Commissioned by The
McKnight Foundation, pp: 75.
MAURY D (1989). The innovative approach of Indian farmers.
In: Chambers R, Pacey A, Thrupp L, (eds). Farmer first: farmer
innovation and agricultural research. London (UK):
Intermediate Technology Publications.
SINGH RP, PVV PRASAD AND K RREDDY (2015). Climate
Change: Implications for Stakeholders in Genetic Resources
and Seed Sector. Advances in Agronomy, 129: 117-180.
