Influence of Seed Treatment on Seed Quality of Rice CMS Line Pusa 6A During Storage


64 / 3

Authors

  • PRAVEEN K SINGH ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi Author
  • SHIV K YADAV ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi Author
  • VILAS A TONAPI ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi Author
  • AMIT BERA ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v45i1.162604

Keywords:

Rice, CMS line, Seed quality, Seed enhancement, Storability, Storage environment

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted to study the effect of seed treatments on storability of rice CMS line Pusa 6A. The seeds were coated with polymers: Disco Agro SP Blue (hydrophobic) and Disco Metal Red (hydrophilic) at different concentrations viz., one coat, two coats with and without thiram @2.5 g/kg seeds, thiram @ 2.5 g/kg seeds + thiamethoxam @2.5g/kg seed and neem oil @ 6ml/kg seed. The treated seeds were stored in three storage environments and evaluated for physiological quality attributes at three month intervals for a period of nine months. The seed quality declined with advancement in storage period, irrespective of storage environments and treatments. All the treatments showed significantly higher seed quality parameters compared to control, except neem oil and thiram + thiamethoxam. However, among the treatments, seed coated with polymer (hydrophobic and hydrophilic) @ 6 ml + thiram @ 2.5 g/kg seed revealed higher germination, vigour index, seedling length and dry weight, regardless of storage environments, until nine months of storage. Among the polymers, the hydrophobic polymer was more effective in maintaining the physiological quality of seed during the storage. The seeds stored in controlled environment at 15±2°C/35±5% RH showed better quality traits as compared to ambient environments, throughout the storage period. Therefore, hydrophobic polymer coupled with thiram can be used as treatment for storage of seeds of rice CMS line Pusa 6A, to maintain seed viability and vigour during 9 months of storage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. ZHOU ZY, SD TANG, GD TANG AND JY HU (1989). Effects of infection and imperfect closed- glume on germination of hybrid rice seed. Int. Rice Res. Newsl., 14(5): 4.

2. PRABAGARAN SR, AS PONNUSWAMMY, C DHARMALINGAM and P RANGASWAMY (1999). Storage potential of parental lines of hybrid rice. Oryza. 36(2): 161-163.

3. PANDEY S (2000). Studies on synchronization of flowering, seed production and storability of parental lines of hybrid rice. Ph.D. thesis, IARI, New Delhi.

4. VANANGAMUDI K AND A BHARATHI (2006). Commercial exploitation of colouring, film coating, pelleting and seed invigoration technologies in high value crop seeds. In: Seed: A Global Perspective. (Kalloo G, SK Jain, AK Vari and U Srivastava Eds.). pp. 194-212, ISST, New Delhi, India.

5. DUAN X AND JS BURRIS (1997). Film coating impairs leaching of germination inhibitors in sugar beet seeds. Crop Sci., 37: 515-520.

6. WEST SH, SK LOFTIN, M WAHL, CD BATICH AND CL BEATLY (1985). Polymers as moisture barriers to maintain seed quality. Crop Sci., 25: 941-945.

7. SAVITRI H, MS REDDY AND BM REDDY (1998). Effect of seed treatment with fungicides and insecticides on seed borne fungi, storage insect pest and seed viability and seedling vigour of groundnut. Seed Res., 26(1): 62-72.

8. “et al.”

Downloads

Submitted

2024-12-19

Published

2024-12-19

How to Cite

PRAVEEN K SINGH, SHIV K YADAV, VILAS A TONAPI, & AMIT BERA. (2024). Influence of Seed Treatment on Seed Quality of Rice CMS Line Pusa 6A During Storage. Seed Research, 45(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v45i1.162604