Wheat seed quality under conservation agriculture system
37 / 3
Keywords:
Wheat, zero tillage, rice residue, seed qualityAbstract
Wheat seed yield and seed quality was studied under conservation agriculture systemconsisting of six tillage combinations viz., RT-DSR-ZTW (Reduced till Direct seeded rice fb Zero tillage wheat), RT-DSR-ZTW-Sesbania, PUTPR (Puddled transplanted rice) - Reduced till wheat, PUTPR- Rotavator wheat, RT-DSR-ZTW+Rice residue and UPTPR (Unpuddled transplanted rice)-ZTW+Rice residue under rice-wheat cropping system at Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Kaithal in 2010-11 and 2011-12. Treatment RT-DSR-ZTW+Rice residue and UPTPR-ZTW+Rice residue performed significantly better than all other treatments for seed yield and seed quality attributes viz., standard germination, speed of germination, vigour index-I & II in 2010-11; these treatments have significantly outperformed PUTPR- Reduced till wheat and PUTPR-Rotavator wheat, the tillage techniques most commonly followed for seed production in wheat. The crop residues retained as surface mulch in RT-DSR-ZTW+Rice residueand UPTPR-ZTW+Rice residue would have helped in regulating the soil temperature, moisture and organic carbon in 2010-11. The greater yield response was mainly due to the cooler weather conditions during the grain filling period and all the treatments were at par for seed yield in 2011-12. Treatments RT-DSR- ZTW, RT-DSR-ZTW-Sesbania, RT-DSR-ZTW+Rice residue and UPTPR-ZTW+Rice residue performed significantly better than PUTPR-Reduced till wheat and PUTPR-Rotavator wheat for seed quality parameters except germination.
Downloads
References
1. GUPTA RK AND SETH A (2007). A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice-wheat cropping systems of the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP). Crop Prot 26: 436-47.
2. HOLLAND JM (2004). The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence. Agri Ecosys Env 103: 1-25.
3. McGARRY D, BRIDGE BJ AND RADFORD BJ (2000). Contrasting soil physical properties after zero and traditional tillage of an alluvial soil in the semi-arid subtropics. Soil Tillage Res 53(2): 105-15.
4. KILICH AND GURSOY S (2010). Effect of seeding rate on yield and yield components of durum wheat cultivars in cotton-wheat cropping system. Sci Res Essays 5(15): 2078-84.
5. SINGH Y (2003). Crop residue management in rice-wheat system, Addressing Resource Conservation Issues in rice-wheat systems of South Asia. A resource book, Rice wheat consortium for Indo-Gangatic Plains (CIMMYT).
6. GHASSEMI-GOLEZANI K AND MAZLOOMI-OSKOOYI R (2008). Effect of ater supply on seed quality development in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris var.). Int J Pl Prod 2: 117-23.
7. ISTA (1999). International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci Tech (supplement) 27: 1- 335.
8. GOMEZ KA AND GOMEZ AA (1984). Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., An IRRI Book, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. BEHL RK, SHEIKHS, ASSEFA M, JINDAL Y AND ASHWANI KUMAR (2010). Heat tolerance and adaptability in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) genotypes. In. Resource Management Towards Sustainable Agriculture and Development, Eds.: RK Behl, J Kubat and T Kleynhans, Agrobios, 2010, xxii, 358p.
10. SINGH NB, SINGH YP AND SINGH YPN (2005). Variation in physiological traits in promising wheat varieties under late sown conditions. Ind J Pl Physio 10(2): 171-5.
11. IARI (2012). Crop residues management with conservation agriculture: Potential, constraints and policy needs. Ind Agril Res Ins, New Delhi, pp: 32.
12. PATHAK H, SAHARAWAT YS, GATHALA M AND LADHA JK (2011). Impact of resource-conserving technologies in the rice-wheat system. Greenhouse Gas Sci. Technol 1: 261-77.