Effect of growing conditions on growth, flowering behaviour and seed yield of parental lines of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) cv. Pusa hybrid-I


35 / 2

Authors

  • FLEMINE XAVIER Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology, I.A.R.I., New Delhi 110 012 Author
  • BALRAJ SINGH Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology, I.A.R.I., New Delhi 110 012 Author
  • B.S. TOMAR Centre for Protected Cultivation Technology, I.A.R.I., New Delhi 110 012 Author

https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v40i2.164317

Keywords:

Insect proof net, open field, growth behaviour, fruit setting, pollen parent

Abstract

The present investigation on parental lines of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Dutch Exploir.) cv. Pusa hybrid-1 was carried out at CPCT farm IARI, New Delhi during summer season under insect proof net (IPN) and open field Condition (OFC). The female line (seed parent) and male line (pollen parent) were transplanted in block method following the planting ratio of 3:1 at drip fertigation in IPN and OFC. Significantly higher vine length, number of leaf node on 30 days, 45 days from transplanting (DFT) and inter nodal length were recorded in seed and pollen parent. Days to first female and male flower opening in seed and pollen parent (56 days and 63.40 days, respectively) were significantly lower under IPN. The production of female flower (30.6/ plant) and male flower (40.3/plant) were significantly higher under IPN as compared to OFC. The number of fruits set (3.6) and matured fruit (3.5/plant were significantly higher under IPN than OFC (1.9 and 1.4, respectively). The incidence of pumpkin mosaic virus and insects were very low under IPN as compared to open field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. VISHWANATH (2007). Studies on floral attributes and methods of pollination on seed yield and quality in pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Dutch Exploir) cv. Pusa hybrid-1, MSc Thesis, PG School, IARI, New Delhi

2. SCHOCH PG (1972). Effect of shade on the leaf and yield of fruit in Capsicum annuum L. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Society 97(4): 461-64

3. EL-AIDY F, MOUSTAFA S AND EL-AFRY (1983). Influence of shade on growth and yield of tomatoes cultivated in summer season in Egypt. Plasticulture 59: 33-36

4. SINGH B, TOMAR BS AND THAKUR SHAILJA (2009). Quality seed production of parental lines of pumpkin under insect proof net house. Paper presented in 4th International Cucurbitaceae Symposium held at HUNAN, China, September 21-26, 2009

5. COLLARD RC, JOINER JN, CONOVER CA AND MC CONNELL DB (1977). Influence of shade and fertilizer on light compensation point Ficus benjamina L. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 24: 447-49

6. MOTENSEN LM AND STROMME E (1987). Effect of light quality on some green house crops. Scientia Horticulturae 33: 27-36

7. HOSSAIN MA, SHARFUDDIN FM, MONDAL MF AND ADITYA DK (1990). Studies on flowering behaviour and effect of hand pollination on fruit set in pumpkin. Bangladesh Journal of Crop Science 1(1): 53-56

8. LAPICHINO GB AND LOY JB (1987). High temperature stress affects pollen viability in bottle gourd. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 112(2): 372-74

9. STAPLETON SC, WIEN HC AND MORSE RA (2000). Flowering and fruit set of pumpkin cultivars under field conditions Hort Science 35(6): 1074-77.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-01-31

Published

2025-02-04

How to Cite

FLEMINE XAVIER, BALRAJ SINGH, & B.S. TOMAR. (2025). Effect of growing conditions on growth, flowering behaviour and seed yield of parental lines of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) cv. Pusa hybrid-I. Seed Research, 40(2), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.56093/sr.v40i2.164317