Standardization of screen sizes and density grades for chilli (Capsicum annuum) seed processing
30 / 4
Keywords:
Chilli, seed processing, screen size, density gradesAbstract
Seeds of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) cv Byadagi were size graded by using different screen sizes, viz. 2.50mm(R) (S_{1}) 2.80mm(R) (S_{2}) 3.10mm(R) (S_{3}) 3.25mm(R) (S_{4}) and density grades D_{1}(1gcc - 1) to D_{4} (1.06 gcc-1), and evaluated for seed quality parameters. The results showed that seed size grades were found to influence seed recovery, test weight, germination and other seed quality parameters such as root length, shoot length, seedling dry weight, vigour index, field emergence, speed of emergence and germination after accelerated ageing. Though S_{4} (3.25mm(R)) seeds showed higher seed quality parameters, they recorded poor seed recovery (68%). Seed size 2.50mm(R) (S_{1}) could be employed with least reduction in seed quality and with high recovery (92%). In seed density grades, despite improvement in D_{3} (1.04 gcc-1) and D_{4} (1.06 gcc-1) density grades, seed recovery was as low as 75 and 66%, respectively. Thus, D_{2} (1.02gcc-1) density grade seed which accounted for seed recovery of 83% was identified as ideal for upgrading seeds.
Downloads
References
1. DHILLON GS AND KLER DS (1976). Crop production in relation to seed size. Seed Res 4: 143-55
2. ANONYMOUS (1998). Recommended sieve sizes for grading of crops, constraints and prospects. Seed Tech News 28(4): 76-77
3. GONTIA AS AND AWASTHI (1999). Effect of seed grading by size on various seed vigour attributes morphological characters and seed yield in soybean [Glycine max (L) Merrill] genotypes. Seed Res 27(1): 25-30
4. KHARE D AND SATPUTE RG (1999). Influence of days to maturity and seed size on germination and seedling vigour in pigeonpea. Seed Res 27(2): 170-73
5. ANONYMOUS (2011). International Rules for Seed Testing. ISTA Secretariat, Zurich, Switzerland
6. ABDUL-BAKI AA AND ANDERSON JD (1973). Vigour determination in soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci 13: 630-33
7. ANONYMOUS (2012). Technical Diary. The Karnataka State Seed Certification Agency. pp 63
8. JACOBSON R AND GLOBERSON (1980). Carrot Seed Quality in Seed Production. Hebblethwaite (ed). Butterworth Publication, pp 637-46
9. DHARMALINGAM C AND BASU RN (1987). Influence of seed size and seed coat colour on production potential of mungbean. Seeds & Farms 13(5): 16-20
10. SHASHIDHAR SD, VYAKARNAL BS AND KULKARNI GN (1987). Effect of size grading on seed quality of cowpea. Seed Res 15(20): 214-15
11. VERMA HR AND SINGH PV (1994). Effect of seed size on germination, seedling growth and yield of pea. Seed Tech News 24(1): 55
12. PALANISWAMY V AND RAMASWAMY KR (1985). Effect of seed size and weight on seedling vigour in Bhendi. Seed Res 13(1): 82-85
13. HEWSTON LT (1964). 'Seed size studies in some vegetable species'. MSc (Agric) Thesis, University of Birminghum
14. VISHWANATH K, KALAPPA VP AND RAJENDRAPRASAD S (2006). Standardization of screen sizes for french bean seed processing, Seed Res 34(1): 77-81
15. FURGUSON D AND TURNER JH (1971). Influence of unfilled seed on emergence and vigour. Crop Sci 11: 713-15
16. SELVARAJ JA AND RAMASWAMY KR (1988). Effect of density grading on seed quality attributes in brinjal. Seed Res 16(1): 117-20
17. PATIL MR, SAPKAL PN AND PATIL VN (1987). Seed coat colour and seed density in relation to germination and vigour of Okra. Ann Pl Physiol 1(2): 122-25
18. LEFFLER HR AND WILLIAMS RD (1983). Seed density classification influences germination and seed growth of cotton. Crop Sci 23: 161-65
19. GORECKI RJ, LOGIN A AND TYMINSKI S (1985). Bioenergetic properties and productivity of legume seeds of different density. Acta Agriculture Tehnicae Oktenensis pp 99
20. TAYLOR AG AND KENNYA TJ (1985). Improvement of germinated seed quality by density separation. J American Soc Hort Sci 110(3): 347-49.