Identification of field and gardenpea (Pisum sativum) varieties using RAPD and ISSR markers
24 / 5
Keywords:
ISSR, RAPD, polymorphism, Pisum sativum, biochemical markers, agro-morphological traitsAbstract
Identification of seven varieties of garden and field pea (Pisum sativum L.) currently under seed multiplication chain in Himachal Pradesh was undertaken using 40 random decamer and 9 ISSR primers. A total of 251 amplicons including 111 RAPDs and 70 ISSRs bands were amplified. The ISSR markers exhibited better polymorphism and resolving power as compared to RAPDs. High pair-wise genetic similarity estimates ranging from 0.50 to 0.86 indicated narrow genetic base of the set of varieties. Clustering analysis based on pooled data grouped 7 varieties in 3 main groups. Four gardenpea varieties comprised one main group, whereas a field pea along with one gardenpea variety constituted other group. Field pea variety, Rachna, was most divergent from other varieties and did not group with any other varieties. All the 7 varieties were resolved completely using variety specific and/or other polymorphic markers amplified using single ISSR and RAPD primers, namely UBC 843 and OPJ 14, respectively. Four random decamer and 6 ISSR primers were identified as potential ones that could alone distinguish 5 or more varieties, out of a set of total 7 varieties. Study indicated possible use of variety-specific amplicons in developing diagnostic kits for identification of current set of pea varieties under cultivation in Himachal Pradesh.
Downloads
References
1. TAR'AN B, ZHANG C, WARKENTIN T, TULLU A AND VANDERBERG A (2005). Genetic diversity among varieties and wild species accessions of pea (Pisum sativum L) based on molecular markers, and morphological and physiological characters. Genome 48: 257-72
2. COOKE RJ (1983). The characterization of Pisum sativum L. (patim) (field pea) cultivars by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electro-phoresis. J Natl Inst Agri Bot 16: 213-20
3. PUNEET K AND RAM HH (1995). Cultivar identification of vegetable peas through seed protein electrophoresis. Recent Hort 2: 91-95
4. SWIECICKI WK AND WOLKO В (1987). Application of electrophoresis methods of isozyme separation to genetical characterization of pea (Pisum sativum L) cultivars. Genet Pol 28: 89-99
5. SAMEC P, POSVEC Z, STEJSKAL J, NASINEC V AND GRIGA M (1998). Cultivar identification and relationship in Pisum sativum L. based on RAPD and isozymes. Biol Plant 41: 39-48
6. SAMEC P AND NASINEC V (1995). Detection of DNA polymorphism among pea cultivars using RAPD technique. Biol Plant 37: 321-27
7. WOLKO B, SWIECICKI WK, KRUSZKA KAND IRZYKOWSKA L (2000). Isozyme and RAPD markers for identification of pea, field bean and lupin cultivars. J Appl Genet 41: 151-65
8. SMYKAL P (2006). Development of an efficient retrotransposon-based fingerprinting method for rapid pea variety identification. J Appl Genet 47: 221-30
9. MURRAY MG AND THOMPSON W (1980). Methods of DNA extraction in higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res 8: 4321
10. ROHLF FJ (1993). NTYSYC-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.0. Exeter Technologies Setauket, New York, USA
11. SIMIONIUC D, UPTMOOR R, FRIEDT W AND ORDON F (2002). Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPD's and RFLP's. Plant Breed 121: 429-35
12. BARANGER A, AUBURT G, ARNAU G, LAINE AL, DENIOT G, POTIER J, WEINACHTER C, LEJEUNE HI, LALLEMAN J AND BURSTIN J (2004). Genetic diversity within Pisum sativum using protein- and PCR-based markers. Theor Appl Genet 108: 1309-21
13. PREVOST A AND WILKINSON MJ (1999). A new system for comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98: 107-12.