Status of Kernel Smut of Rice in Andhra Pradesh
22 / 1
Keywords:
Kernel smut, paddy bunt, Tilletia barclayana, RiceAbstract
Three thousand three hundred and twenty samples from different agro climatic zones of Andhra Pradesh were analyzed for the prevalence of paddy bunt disease during 1993-2008. Highest infected samples (47.99%) were recorded in Krishna - Godavari zone followed by northern Telangana Zone (30.8%) in farmers seed lots as compared to processed seed samples which recorded 20.5 per cent and 13.4 per cent in the above two zones, respectively. Among different varieties, IR-64 (2.28%) recorded maximum bunt infection in farmers seed lots, which was above seed certification standard of 0.5 per cent. In processed seed samples also maximum infection was recorded in IR-64 (1.22%). The infected samples that crossed the seed certification standard in farmers samples were found to be (31) and 2 infected samples that crossed the seed certification standard of 0.5 per cent in processed seed samples. Krishna Godavari Zone and northern Telangana Zones of Andhra Pradesh were identified as hot spots for paddy bunt infection.
Downloads
References
1. SINGH R.S. (1983). Plant diseases (5th edition) Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.
2. NEEMA, K.G. (1983). Seed borne disease and seed certification. Paper presented at the second workshop on All India Co-ordinated Research Project on seed borne diseases held at Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand, India from September, 20-22.
3. SINGH, D.K. & R.C. RAI (1994). A view on seed certification standards for rice bunt. Seed Res., 22: 50-53.
4. SHARMA, R.C., INDU SHARMA, ROHIT AGARWAL & ASHOK GAUR (2008). Kernel smut of rice: An overview. Seed Res., 36(1): 1-17.
5. TUNWAR, N.S. & S.S. SINGH (1988). Indian minimum seed certification standards. The Central Seed Certification Board, Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
6. USDA (2005). United Status Standards for Rice, Washington, USDA.
7. KAMESHWAR ROW, K.V.S.P. (1962). Incidence of bunt disease on rice. Science & culture, 28: 534-535.
8. SATTAR M.A., H. SAVITRI, B. MURALIMOHAN REDDY & M. SIDDIQUI (1992). Paddy bunt in Andhra Pradesh. Seed Res., 20(2): 124-127.
9. WAHAB, T., H.S. SAVITRI, S.H. HUSSAINI, B. SATYANARYANA, V.T. REDDY & PUSHPALATHA (1989). Prevalence of paddy bunt in Andhra Pradesh. Seed Tech. News, 19: 7-9.
10. CHOUDHARY, S. (1946). Mode of transmission of the bunt of rice. Current Science, 15: 111.
11. REDDY, C.S. & S.M. REDDY (1992). Smuts of rice. Indian J. Mycol. and Pl. Pathol., 22(2): 125-138.
12. AGGARWAL, V.K. & A.K. SRIVASTAVA (1981). A simple techniques for routine examination of rice seed lot for rice bunt. Seed Tech News, 11: 11-20.
13. AUJLA S.S., INDU SHARMA & B.B. SINGH (1989). Scale for identifying wheat varieties resistant to Neovossia indica. Indian Phytopath., 42: 161-162.